{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/1492","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ArctosDB/arctos","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/1492/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/1492/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/1492/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/1492","id":310584329,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMTA1ODQzMjk=","number":1492,"title":"adjust verbatim collector to verbatim agent","user":{"login":"AJLinn","id":17605945,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE3NjA1OTQ1","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/17605945?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/AJLinn","html_url":"https://github.com/AJLinn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AJLinn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AJLinn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AJLinn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AJLinn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AJLinn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AJLinn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AJLinn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AJLinn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AJLinn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":16,"created_at":"2018-04-02T19:34:53Z","updated_at":"2018-07-12T19:17:47Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"Would anyone be opposed to adjusting the CTATTRIBUTE_TYPE \"verbatim collector\" to \"verbatim agent\" ? \r\n\r\nMore often than not, we're entering the name of the maker/artist who only has a name string signed on the piece and we may or may not be able to figure out the actual agent name. By changing this to  \"verbatim agent\" everyone could enter the qualifying info in the \"remarks\" and \"det. method\" fields \r\n to indicate which agent type and then use the preferred \"unknown\" as the agent.\r\n\r\nAs it is with verbatim collector it adds confusion and I would not have my staff/students use this field."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/comments/404621406","html_url":"https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/1492#issuecomment-404621406","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/1492","id":404621406,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNDYyMTQwNg==","user":{"login":"Jegelewicz","id":5725767,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjU3MjU3Njc=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/5725767?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Jegelewicz","html_url":"https://github.com/Jegelewicz","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Jegelewicz/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Jegelewicz/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Jegelewicz/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Jegelewicz/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Jegelewicz/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Jegelewicz/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Jegelewicz/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Jegelewicz/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Jegelewicz/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-07-12T19:17:47Z","updated_at":"2018-07-12T19:17:47Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"From Dusty above:\r\n\r\n> So, can we do this in documentation?\r\n> \r\n> Attribute Type: Ya'll tell me.\r\n> \r\n> Description: Verbatim text string representing an Agent as associated with a specimen. Usage should generally be limited to low-quality agents (e.g., those not likely to become associated with more data) and to data normally recorded in table Collector (under any role in https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=CTCOLLECTOR_ROLE). When known, Collector Role should be entered in Attribute Remarks.\r\n> \r\n> Edits and/or better ideas greatly appreciated.\r\n> \r\n> Please do NOT make any code table changes - this is used by application code, I'll sync everything up when we have an acceptable solution.\r\n\r\nAWG asked for the following:\r\n\r\nAttribute Type: verbatim agent\r\n\r\nAttribute Value: Code table - same values as collector type, but add \"determiner\" and \"unknown\"\r\n\r\nDescription: Verbatim text string representing an Agent as associated with a specimen should be placed in remarks. Usage should generally be limited to low-quality agents (e.g., those not likely to become associated with more data) and to data normally recorded in table Collector (under any role in https://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm?table=CTCOLLECTOR_ROLE).\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"Jegelewicz"}}