{"push_id":2410366740,"size":3,"distinct_size":3,"ref":"refs/heads/lute-ibis","head":"529f18a063233972bae48a2edd5bab9f19ee9b66","before":"051b60a47023d6eda48e07cd5e08ca0299d96aa5","commits":[{"sha":"182cc93d9f34b5108fe049e1760f89c495572ef7","author":{"name":"jeff","email":"cd222e95db77bf226701aa481e7d5854c52e3e71@gmail.com"},"message":"refactor new LUTE implementation to decouple from commons math types except in fitting\n\nso we can try other fitting libraries in the future, e.g. LASSO or ridge regression","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/donaldlab/OSPREY_refactor/commits/182cc93d9f34b5108fe049e1760f89c495572ef7"},{"sha":"e604a872ceee28b8ab6a86be9ea60c2aea583be2","author":{"name":"jeff","email":"cd222e95db77bf226701aa481e7d5854c52e3e71@gmail.com"},"message":"implement LASSO for regularized regression, among other optimizations and bug fixes\n\nLASSO seems to require fewer samples than OLS to meet the same threshold of overfitting,\nbut takes more time to fit. If the bottleneck is calculating energies for samples,\nthen LASSO is likely to take less time overall than OLS.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/donaldlab/OSPREY_refactor/commits/e604a872ceee28b8ab6a86be9ea60c2aea583be2"},{"sha":"529f18a063233972bae48a2edd5bab9f19ee9b66","author":{"name":"jeff","email":"cd222e95db77bf226701aa481e7d5854c52e3e71@gmail.com"},"message":"add code to estimate size of pruned conf space, and update DEE,LUTE reporting\n\nthe bounds are a little looser than I'd like for now, but there's still room to optimize the tightness a bit more","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/donaldlab/OSPREY_refactor/commits/529f18a063233972bae48a2edd5bab9f19ee9b66"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"cuchaz"}}