{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/456","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/456/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/456/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/456/events","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/456","id":332177037,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMzIxNzcwMzc=","number":456,"title":"Improve up2 and vp2 for Sc simulations (Trac #456)","user":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":963997231,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjM5OTcyMzE=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/Migrated%20from%20Trac","name":"Migrated from Trac","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":963997516,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjM5OTc1MTY=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/clubb_src","name":"clubb_src","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":963997249,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjM5OTcyNDk=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/defect","name":"defect","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":963997501,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjM5OTc1MDE=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/dschanen@uwm.edu","name":"dschanen@uwm.edu","color":"FFFFFF","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestones/1","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestone/1","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestones/1/labels","id":3423152,"node_id":"MDk6TWlsZXN0b25lMzQyMzE1Mg==","number":1,"title":"Improve the accuracy of CLUBB's horizontal winds","description":null,"creator":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":6,"closed_issues":9,"state":"open","created_at":"2018-06-13T20:00:45Z","updated_at":"2018-06-14T11:09:30Z","due_on":null,"closed_at":null},"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-06-13T21:49:01Z","updated_at":"2018-06-15T03:20:58Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"OWNER","body":"**Description**\nSince we've added the equations for up2 and vp2 from Bougealt, et al. 1981 and began plotting them on our CLUBB plotgen panels we've noticed that the LES produces a very different profile shape for cases our Sc cases like FIRE, DYCOMS II RF01 & RF02, as well as some of our deep convective cases.  Leah Grant tried modifying the damping on the terms in https://github.com/larson-group/clubb/issues/211, but had mixed results.\nSince then we've made some additional changes to the parameterization, so perhaps we can revisit some of her code and see if things improve.\n**Things to try**\n * Turning back on l_use_experimental_term_pr2 and reducing C4.\n\n * In addition to being too small near the inversion, most Sc cases show low up2/vp2 near the ground.  Perhaps we should take a look at the surface_varnce subroutine.\n\n * To be determined.\n\n**Tests**\nAny changes made to the tunable parameters should have a minimal negative impact on our other cases if we commit them.\nThe computational cost of CLUBB should also not be increased by a large margin by our changes.\n\nAttachments:\n\n[wp3.png](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/clubb/wp3.png)\n[wp2.png](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/clubb/wp2.png)\n\nMigrated from http://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/ticket/456\n```json\n{\n    \"status\": \"new\", \n    \"changetime\": \"2017-10-22T19:05:19\", \n    \"description\": \"'''Description'''\\nSince we've added the equations for up2 and vp2 from Bougealt, et al. 1981 and began plotting them on our CLUBB plotgen panels we've noticed that the LES produces a very different profile shape for cases our Sc cases like FIRE, DYCOMS II RF01 & RF02, as well as some of our deep convective cases.  Leah Grant tried modifying the damping on the terms in clubb:ticket:211, but had mixed results.\\nSince then we've made some additional changes to the parameterization, so perhaps we can revisit some of her code and see if things improve.\\n'''Things to try'''\\n * Turning back on l_use_experimental_term_pr2 and reducing C4.\\n\\n * In addition to being too small near the inversion, most Sc cases show low up2/vp2 near the ground.  Perhaps we should take a look at the surface_varnce subroutine.\\n\\n * To be determined.\\n\\n'''Tests'''\\nAny changes made to the tunable parameters should have a minimal negative impact on our other cases if we commit them.\\nThe computational cost of CLUBB should also not be increased by a large margin by our changes.\", \n    \"reporter\": \"dschanen@uwm.edu\", \n    \"cc\": \"vlarson@uwm.edu\", \n    \"resolution\": \"\", \n    \"_ts\": \"1508699119431873\", \n    \"component\": \"clubb_src\", \n    \"summary\": \"Improve up2 and vp2 for Sc simulations\", \n    \"priority\": \"major\", \n    \"keywords\": \"variance, stratocumulous\", \n    \"time\": \"2011-09-30T17:43:17\", \n    \"milestone\": \"Improve the accuracy of CLUBB's horizontal winds\", \n    \"owner\": \"dschanen@uwm.edu\", \n    \"type\": \"defect\"\n}\n```\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/comments/397502086","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/456#issuecomment-397502086","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/456","id":397502086,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NzUwMjA4Ng==","user":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-06-15T03:20:58Z","updated_at":"2018-06-15T03:20:58Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"**Trac update on 2011/09/30 at 18:44**\n**dschanen@uwm.edu commented:**\n\nTwo things I noticed while reading Bougeault and hoceqns:\n1. In Bougeault the coriolis terms are:\n+ f( vm - vg ) and\n- f( um - ug )\nBut in hocqens we have:\n- f( vg - vm ) and\n+ f( ug - um )\n\nMaybe I'm missing something, but it seems like we have a different term.  Is the term in Bougeault wrong?\n\nAlso, in Bougeault u'w' and v'w' are given by the same equation as u'^2^ and v'^2^, but we just use upwp = K * du/dz in advance_windm_edsclrm.  If we wanted to be fancy about it, I think we could compute the covariance terms using the other equation.\n\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"StrikeNP"}}