{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sot/proseco/issues/3","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sot/proseco","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sot/proseco/issues/3/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sot/proseco/issues/3/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sot/proseco/issues/3/events","html_url":"https://github.com/sot/proseco/issues/3","id":328332273,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMjgzMzIyNzM=","number":3,"title":"Starcheck needs to be able to call to get access to probabilities","user":{"login":"taldcroft","id":348089,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjM0ODA4OQ==","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/348089?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/taldcroft","html_url":"https://github.com/taldcroft","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/taldcroft/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/taldcroft/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/taldcroft/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/taldcroft/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/taldcroft/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/taldcroft/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/taldcroft/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/taldcroft/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/taldcroft/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":950448127,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NTA0NDgxMjc=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sot/proseco/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"a2eeef","default":true}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2018-05-31T23:35:46Z","updated_at":"2018-08-21T17:38:04Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"MEMBER","body":"There needs to be a pathway for starcheck to feed in a load catalog (which may have been hand-edited) and get the individual star marginalized `p_acq` and probably `p_safe`.  Right now the code assumes the acq catalog has been generated and has the required metadata."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sot/proseco/issues/comments/414759091","html_url":"https://github.com/sot/proseco/issues/3#issuecomment-414759091","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sot/proseco/issues/3","id":414759091,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxNDc1OTA5MQ==","user":{"login":"jeanconn","id":791508,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjc5MTUwOA==","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/791508?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jeanconn","html_url":"https://github.com/jeanconn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jeanconn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jeanconn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jeanconn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jeanconn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jeanconn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jeanconn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jeanconn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jeanconn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jeanconn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-08-21T17:38:04Z","updated_at":"2018-08-21T17:38:04Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"> Another option that might be reasonable is effectively re-running proseco but forcing it to use the backstop catalog and other inputs and turning off optimization. This will give you the marginalized p_acq values for exactly the to-be-flown backstop and should do the right thing for edited catalogs.\r\n\r\nI think this might be the same as what I was suggesting.  But will refine as we get there."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jeanconn"}}