{"push_id":2850694886,"size":1,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"25ba2c14b7c5681d985c95402d0ce21fce902825","before":"47e67175cf27b2dcde13a8283c690969366a0fd2","commits":[{"sha":"25ba2c14b7c5681d985c95402d0ce21fce902825","author":{"name":"Josiah Gaskin","email":"10695728c2f0f4e4d9ccf1c32577b28dfb636bfa@fb.com"},"message":"Proposal for exposing current node for deps iteration\n\nSummary:\nProposed solution for making it easier to use the 3-param version of `deps`.\nRight now there's no way to e.g. traverse only the `provided_deps` edges of a node.\n\nThis diff implements a `lookup()` function for resolving general target variables, and\nadds a `this` variable to represent the current target. This means that following `provided_deps` edges becomes:\n\n`deps(top_level_target, labels(\"provided_deps\", lookup(this)))`\n\nHappy to accept any suggestions for naming of the `lookup()` function and the `this` variable\n\nReviewed By: tdrhq\n\nfbshipit-source-id: 82042579be","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/facebook/buck/commits/25ba2c14b7c5681d985c95402d0ce21fce902825"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"facebook-github-bot"}}