{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/rust-memchr/issues/19","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/rust-memchr","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/rust-memchr/issues/19/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/rust-memchr/issues/19/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/rust-memchr/issues/19/events","html_url":"https://github.com/BurntSushi/rust-memchr/issues/19","id":262073887,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUyNjIwNzM4ODc=","number":19,"title":"Revisit Windows performance","user":{"login":"bluss","id":3209739,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjMyMDk3Mzk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/3209739?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bluss","html_url":"https://github.com/bluss","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bluss/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bluss/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bluss/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bluss/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bluss/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bluss/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bluss/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bluss/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bluss/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2017-10-02T12:49:59Z","updated_at":"2018-09-17T20:31:53Z","closed_at":"2018-09-17T20:31:53Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"I think it would be great if someone with access to a windows environment could run benchmarks to revisit the built-in vs this crate's fallback implementation of memchr."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"BurntSushi"}}