{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/547","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/547/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/547/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/547/events","html_url":"https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/547","id":171652202,"number":547,"title":"Possible key-candy for us emacs knuckledraggers...","user":{"login":"EmmanuelCharpentier","id":7955276,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/7955276?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/EmmanuelCharpentier","html_url":"https://github.com/EmmanuelCharpentier","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EmmanuelCharpentier/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EmmanuelCharpentier/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EmmanuelCharpentier/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EmmanuelCharpentier/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EmmanuelCharpentier/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EmmanuelCharpentier/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EmmanuelCharpentier/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EmmanuelCharpentier/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/EmmanuelCharpentier/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":57237790,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/labels/awaiting-user-feedback","name":"awaiting-user-feedback","color":"b60205","default":false},{"id":231666162,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/labels/question","name":"question","color":"006b75","default":true}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2016-08-17T13:05:30Z","updated_at":"2018-03-09T09:18:53Z","closed_at":"2016-10-06T22:13:20Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"From [your page](https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/wiki/Cite-as-you-Write)\n\n> Good news for TeXnicians and those down with Mark (aka Markdown, RST, whatnot): this is the time to go pester the author of your favorite editor for Zotero integration! \n\nSince you asked :-) ...\n\nI'm a big fan of \\LaTeX and emacs+AuCTeX (which uses RefTeX), and better BibTeX + auto-refreshing is quite a help. However, more than once, I fond myself  manually refreshing a supposedly automatically exported collection : my browser didn't feel sufficiently \"idle\" to refresh the newly-imported items in my exported collection.\n\nCould we have a bit of emacs-lisp allowing us to request this refresh from emacs ? Such a code snippet could probably be submitted to RefTeX authors for inclusion in the parent package.\n\nOTOH, some might consider this a bit futile, given the dwindling numbers of \\LaTeX knuckledraggers (compared to Markdown users)... It could become less futile if adapted also to the needs of Markdown users : most Markdown variants in current use allow for some form of other of bibliography marking using bibtex (or biblatex) \"databases\". See [pandoc citations](http://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#citations) for an example. And, yes, Markdown user often use emacs to edit their sources. Again, the relevant emacs lisp code snippet could be submitted to the relevant emacs mode authors for inclusion...\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/comments/371757862","html_url":"https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/547#issuecomment-371757862","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/547","id":371757862,"user":{"login":"lock[bot]","id":33595554,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/in/6672?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/lock%5Bbot%5D","html_url":"https://github.com/apps/lock","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lock%5Bbot%5D/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lock%5Bbot%5D/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lock%5Bbot%5D/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lock%5Bbot%5D/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lock%5Bbot%5D/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lock%5Bbot%5D/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lock%5Bbot%5D/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lock%5Bbot%5D/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lock%5Bbot%5D/received_events","type":"Bot","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-03-09T09:18:53Z","updated_at":"2018-03-09T09:18:53Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"This thread has been automatically locked because it has not had recent activity. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"lock"}}