{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMx/OpenMx/issues/78","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMx/OpenMx","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMx/OpenMx/issues/78/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMx/OpenMx/issues/78/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMx/OpenMx/issues/78/events","html_url":"https://github.com/OpenMx/OpenMx/issues/78","id":317699438,"number":78,"title":"improve CI output in summary: More informative","user":{"login":"tbates","id":736156,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/736156?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbates","html_url":"https://github.com/tbates","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbates/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbates/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbates/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbates/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbates/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbates/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbates/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbates/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbates/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2018-04-25T16:19:12Z","updated_at":"2018-05-03T15:41:40Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"OWNER","body":"from #75 \r\n\r\n1. Include values when the estimate produces one (don't convert to NA just because of warnings)\r\n2. enhance the output column, so instead of just  `!!!`  add a brief code for the error (perhaps as simple as 1, 2, 3... \r\n3. list these coded outcomes in an attribute, which the print method for CIs can display, but doesn't bollox the table for users seeking to post-process it.\r\n\r\ncandidate codes could be verbal, so \r\n`!!! [alpha, OK]]` for \"problem: lower bound alpha level not reached\"\r\n`!!! [OK, constrained]]` for \"problem: \"upper had non-linear constraint infeasible\"\r\n`!!! [blue, blue]]` for \"problem: \"lower iteration limit/blue, upper iteration limit/blue\" \r\n`!!! [blue, ]]` for \"problem: \"lower iteration limit/blue, upper not requested\" \r\n\r\nThis would save users from having to mxSummary(model, verbose=T) to see what's up.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMx/OpenMx/issues/comments/386339980","html_url":"https://github.com/OpenMx/OpenMx/issues/78#issuecomment-386339980","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMx/OpenMx/issues/78","id":386339980,"user":{"login":"jpritikin","id":2002771,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/2002771?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpritikin","html_url":"https://github.com/jpritikin","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpritikin/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpritikin/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpritikin/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpritikin/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpritikin/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpritikin/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpritikin/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpritikin/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jpritikin/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-05-03T15:41:40Z","updated_at":"2018-05-03T15:41:40Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"Yeah, the difficulty is caused by the desire to combine the upper and lower bounds on a single line."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jpritikin"}}