{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forestgeo/allodb/issues/58","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forestgeo/allodb","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forestgeo/allodb/issues/58/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forestgeo/allodb/issues/58/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forestgeo/allodb/issues/58/events","html_url":"https://github.com/forestgeo/allodb/issues/58","id":371543480,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNzE1NDM0ODA=","number":58,"title":"Set up trial runs of allo-db","user":{"login":"teixeirak","id":6355854,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjYzNTU4NTQ=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/6355854?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/teixeirak","html_url":"https://github.com/teixeirak","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teixeirak/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teixeirak/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teixeirak/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teixeirak/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teixeirak/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teixeirak/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teixeirak/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teixeirak/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/teixeirak/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2018-10-18T13:56:24Z","updated_at":"2018-10-19T11:48:19Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"COLLABORATOR","body":"Let's set up trial runs of allodb on census data. I recommend starting with SCBI and BCI because they provide examples of tropical and temperate sites, and data are fully open access. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forestgeo/allodb/issues/comments/431336928","html_url":"https://github.com/forestgeo/allodb/issues/58#issuecomment-431336928","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forestgeo/allodb/issues/58","id":431336928,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMTMzNjkyOA==","user":{"login":"maurolepore","id":5856545,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjU4NTY1NDU=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/5856545?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/maurolepore","html_url":"https://github.com/maurolepore","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maurolepore/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maurolepore/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maurolepore/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maurolepore/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maurolepore/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maurolepore/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maurolepore/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maurolepore/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maurolepore/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-10-19T11:48:19Z","updated_at":"2018-10-19T11:48:19Z","author_association":"MEMBER","body":">  You're welcome to put it in fgeo.data, with the understanding that the master is still the one in the database.\r\n\r\nGreat! The way I usually manage different versions of data is this:\r\n\r\n* Each site gets its own package. That's the place to keep the data up to date. I keep this package and its associated GitHub repo _private_.\r\n\r\n* If the PI authorizes, I use some datasets or subsets of datasets in __fgeo.data__ and any other package that needs those data.\r\n\r\nThis modular approach makes it easy to maintain the data. If you update the data, there is only one place to do it and you are free to update it as frequently as you want in the (maybe private) __scbi__ package. Then, how frequently I update the packages downstream depends on the release plan. \r\n\r\nThe structure I suggest is therefore this:\r\n\r\n* __scbi__ depends on nothing.\r\n* __allodb__ uses some or all data from scbi.\r\n* __fgeo.data__ uses some or all data from __scbi__.\r\n\r\nWould you be happy to follow this structure? Do you think there is a better way to do it? "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"maurolepore"}}