{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/liabru/matter-js/issues/608","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/liabru/matter-js","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/liabru/matter-js/issues/608/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/liabru/matter-js/issues/608/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/liabru/matter-js/issues/608/events","html_url":"https://github.com/liabru/matter-js/issues/608","id":318245005,"number":608,"title":"The performance is worse than box2d.js","user":{"login":"finscn","id":288367,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/288367?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/finscn","html_url":"https://github.com/finscn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/finscn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/finscn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/finscn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/finscn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/finscn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/finscn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/finscn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/finscn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/finscn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-04-27T01:04:16Z","updated_at":"2018-04-27T01:04:16Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"I found the performance of matter.js is worse than box2d.js  (only 40%)\r\n\r\nThere is a test I created:\r\n\r\nhttp://fatidol.com/phy-benchmark/\r\n\r\nThere are many different box2d.js projects , I chose https://github.com/flyover/box2d.js ,\r\nBecause it includes Google's LiquidFun , I like this feature.\r\n\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"finscn"}}