{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/20","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/20/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/20/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/20/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/20","id":391814848,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzOTE4MTQ4NDg=","number":20,"title":"If we don't go with npm-style module specifiers, what should the syntax be?","user":{"login":"littledan","id":189835,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE4OTgzNQ==","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/189835?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan","html_url":"https://github.com/littledan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":46,"created_at":"2018-12-17T17:26:45Z","updated_at":"2018-12-22T05:39:51Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"MEMBER","body":"Ideas I've heard so far:\r\n- \"scope:module\"\r\n- \"scope::module\"\r\n\r\nWhat else are you thinking of?\r\n\r\nSplitting into another thread based on https://github.com/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/12#issuecomment-447925779 ."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/comments/449547035","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/20#issuecomment-449547035","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/20","id":449547035,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTU0NzAzNQ==","user":{"login":"Pauan","id":97238,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjk3MjM4","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/97238?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pauan","html_url":"https://github.com/Pauan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pauan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pauan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pauan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pauan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pauan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pauan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pauan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pauan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pauan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-12-22T05:39:51Z","updated_at":"2018-12-22T05:39:51Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"@martinheidegger That is true, but there is precedent for that: `require(\"fs\")` uses a different lookup strategy from `require(\"foo\")`, since `\"fs\"` is a built-in module."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"Pauan"}}