{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RSGInc/SOABM/issues/72","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RSGInc/SOABM","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RSGInc/SOABM/issues/72/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RSGInc/SOABM/issues/72/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RSGInc/SOABM/issues/72/events","html_url":"https://github.com/RSGInc/SOABM/issues/72","id":369300993,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNjkzMDA5OTM=","number":72,"title":"Verify R-squared calculation in ABM Viz tool","user":{"login":"bettinardi","id":12942080,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjEyOTQyMDgw","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/12942080?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bettinardi","html_url":"https://github.com/bettinardi","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bettinardi/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bettinardi/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bettinardi/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bettinardi/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bettinardi/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bettinardi/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bettinardi/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bettinardi/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bettinardi/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-10-11T20:53:51Z","updated_at":"2018-10-11T20:53:51Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"COLLABORATOR","body":"In working to improve the calibration for SOABM I am noticing that both Visum's internal calculation and when I bring the count comparison into excel calculate an R-squared for the PM peak of about ~0.78.  The viz tool is reporting ~0.87 for the same data.  The other measures, like the Gap statistics, help suggest that 0.78 is more correct than 0.87.  \r\n\r\nThe team needs to go into the R code in the viz tool and verify that the calculations to determine the R-squared in count comparison makes sense. This is loosely connected to issue #65, which is related since it deals with the comparison of network data.  So while either issue is being addressed / reviewed, the other issue should be addressed as well."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"bettinardi"}}