{"push_id":2981613812,"size":2,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/kenshiro-cancel-page-copy-update","head":"b5008e727e02d7f3ef17c0a610c2b22f535acae6","before":"fd933db0365a77c122002d3a1f9e84949373682b","commits":[{"sha":"8f3e28c04dffa1db6eb5a112f06776968122dbdd","author":{"name":"Kenshiro Nakagawa","email":"0cd5f1043292f3613471226572765685b423de86@gmail.com"},"message":"Redesign intake confirmation (#7438)\n\nConnects #7303 \r\n\r\n### Description\r\n* Updates the Completed page for appeals, HLR, and SC intake confirmation pages to the new design\r\n* Refactors the confirmation pages together, since they are very similar except for the content of the checklists\r\n\r\n@carolaponce a couple design questions, since the style guide for this checklist confirmation component differs from the mock:\r\n* the subheaders are centered in the style guide, but left-justified in the mocks. I figure that the style guide reflects other uses of StatusMessage so I kept it centered, wdyt?\r\n* 'Edit the notice letter ...' could be styled black to match the mock, currently the style guide for StatusMessage uses a dark gray instead\r\n* the bold checklist item titles and contention text have a pretty narrow width, while the mock uses a much wider width. is it ok as-is, or should I try to give the items more space?\r\n\r\nNotes:\r\n* The form refactor is a bit in-between in that it will eventually allow us to use a similar pattern to AddIssues (one component conditionally displaying different form content vs a component per form), I'm not particularly tied to this approach\r\n\r\nSupplemental Claim:\r\n<img width=\"1224\" alt=\"screen shot 2018-10-22 at 12 08 34 pm\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/279406/47313957-250b4700-d5f5-11e8-9541-731921961c69.png\">\r\n\r\nHigher Level Review:\r\n<img width=\"1223\" alt=\"screen shot 2018-10-22 at 12 09 41 pm\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/279406/47313747-939bd500-d5f4-11e8-979f-0a4fbad06bee.png\">\r\n\r\nAppeal:\r\n<img width=\"1224\" alt=\"screen shot 2018-10-22 at 12 10 37 pm\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/279406/47313756-97c7f280-d5f4-11e8-83b6-2aee9f3061c8.png\">\r\n\r\n### Acceptance Criteria\r\n* When a SC intake is completed, the confirmation page displays a checklist with EPs & contentions\r\n* When a HLR intake is completed, the confirmation page displays a checklist with EPs & contentions, as well as an item for informal conference if selected\r\n* When an appeal intake is completed, the confirmation page displays a list of the issues created\r\n\r\n### Testing Plan\r\n* see AC, any HLR/SC/appeal intake will do","distinct":false,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/department-of-veterans-affairs/caseflow/commits/8f3e28c04dffa1db6eb5a112f06776968122dbdd"},{"sha":"b5008e727e02d7f3ef17c0a610c2b22f535acae6","author":{"name":"va-bot","email":"6642ce8fcfff535b2c207a486da7db8140cb3a2a@adhocteam.us"},"message":"Merge branch 'master' into kenshiro-cancel-page-copy-update","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/department-of-veterans-affairs/caseflow/commits/b5008e727e02d7f3ef17c0a610c2b22f535acae6"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"va-bot"}}