{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/EntityFrameworkCore/issues/10844","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/EntityFrameworkCore","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/EntityFrameworkCore/issues/10844/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/EntityFrameworkCore/issues/10844/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/EntityFrameworkCore/issues/10844/events","html_url":"https://github.com/aspnet/EntityFrameworkCore/issues/10844","id":293510472,"number":10844,"title":"Ignore Properties Without Setter","user":{"login":"rjperes","id":159433,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/159433?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjperes","html_url":"https://github.com/rjperes","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjperes/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjperes/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjperes/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjperes/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjperes/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjperes/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjperes/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjperes/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjperes/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-02-01T12:21:19Z","updated_at":"2018-02-01T17:18:57Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"Shouldn't we automatically ignore properties without a setter? Note that I'm not talking about properties with private setters.\r\nWhat happens is, if we have getter-only properties in our model - for example, for doing some calculation - EF still tries to map them."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/EntityFrameworkCore/issues/comments/362338017","html_url":"https://github.com/aspnet/EntityFrameworkCore/issues/10844#issuecomment-362338017","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aspnet/EntityFrameworkCore/issues/10844","id":362338017,"user":{"login":"ajcvickers","id":1430078,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/1430078?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajcvickers","html_url":"https://github.com/ajcvickers","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajcvickers/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajcvickers/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajcvickers/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajcvickers/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajcvickers/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajcvickers/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajcvickers/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajcvickers/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajcvickers/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-02-01T17:18:57Z","updated_at":"2018-02-01T17:18:57Z","author_association":"MEMBER","body":"@rjperes Only properties with a getter and a setter are mapped by convention, except for collection navigation properties where a setter is not needed. If you are seeing otherwise, then please post a runnable project/solution or complete code listing that demonstrates the behavior you are seeing."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ajcvickers"}}