{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/codemetar/issues/76","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/codemetar","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/codemetar/issues/76/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/codemetar/issues/76/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/codemetar/issues/76/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ropensci/codemetar/issues/76","id":312622838,"number":76,"title":"Separate opinions from the rest","user":{"login":"maelle","id":8360597,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/8360597?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle","html_url":"https://github.com/maelle","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-04-09T17:42:26Z","updated_at":"2018-04-11T12:37:46Z","closed_at":"2018-04-11T12:37:46Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"@cboettig here are my thoughts :-)\r\n\r\n* Have a function `opinionated_codemeta_preparation` or something like that returning a data.frame or list of things that could be improved if following e.g. the guidelines we have at rOpenSci onboarding (using Authors@R, URL in DESCRIPTION etc). Export it.\r\n\r\n* In write_codemeta, have an argument `show_opinions` TRUE by default. `create_codemeta` would use the robust codemeta creating code, but `write_codemeta` would also message or warning the data.frame of potential improvements by calling the opinionated function.\r\n\r\n* The user could silence this by setting `show_opinions` to FALSE.\r\n\r\n* When trying to improve the metadata of a package or of a herd of packages (e.g. all rOpenSci packages) one could use the output of the opinionated function."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/codemetar/issues/comments/380436511","html_url":"https://github.com/ropensci/codemetar/issues/76#issuecomment-380436511","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/codemetar/issues/76","id":380436511,"user":{"login":"maelle","id":8360597,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/8360597?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle","html_url":"https://github.com/maelle","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/maelle/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-04-11T12:37:46Z","updated_at":"2018-04-11T12:37:46Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"Function that does that added to dev, and robust author parsing added back."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"maelle"}}