{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DiseaseOntology/HumanDiseaseOntology/issues/638","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DiseaseOntology/HumanDiseaseOntology","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DiseaseOntology/HumanDiseaseOntology/issues/638/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DiseaseOntology/HumanDiseaseOntology/issues/638/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DiseaseOntology/HumanDiseaseOntology/issues/638/events","html_url":"https://github.com/DiseaseOntology/HumanDiseaseOntology/issues/638","id":391795593,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzOTE3OTU1OTM=","number":638,"title":"missing def xrefs","user":{"login":"tutajm","id":38506204,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjM4NTA2MjA0","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/38506204?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tutajm","html_url":"https://github.com/tutajm","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tutajm/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tutajm/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tutajm/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tutajm/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tutajm/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tutajm/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tutajm/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tutajm/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tutajm/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2018-12-17T16:39:53Z","updated_at":"2018-12-17T19:18:07Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"In The Dec 14 2018 release, xrefs for term definitions are missing. Is this intentional?\r\n\r\nDefinition xrefs was a useful and unique feature of DO ontology. We will miss it if it will be gone forever :-("},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DiseaseOntology/HumanDiseaseOntology/issues/comments/447964997","html_url":"https://github.com/DiseaseOntology/HumanDiseaseOntology/issues/638#issuecomment-447964997","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DiseaseOntology/HumanDiseaseOntology/issues/638","id":447964997,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0Nzk2NDk5Nw==","user":{"login":"lschriml","id":4333069,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjQzMzMwNjk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/4333069?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/lschriml","html_url":"https://github.com/lschriml","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lschriml/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lschriml/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lschriml/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lschriml/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lschriml/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lschriml/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lschriml/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lschriml/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lschriml/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-12-17T19:18:07Z","updated_at":"2018-12-17T19:18:07Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"Hello Becky,\n   If you have the band width for this update this week, please move the definition source back to the definition xref field. And push another release. \n    For the release please check the date and sunset fields for the obo files in,\n    Ontology/subsets and in the release folder. \n     We can discuss how to handle the ECO codes when I am back.\n\nThank you for coordinating this update. \n\nCheers,\nLynn\n\nSent from my iPhone\n\n> On Dec 17, 2018, at 12:23 PM, Rebecca Tauber <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n> \n> can you not put this annotation directly on the annotation assertion?\n> \n> Our concern with this is it would be seen as just another definition xref for the definition, e.g.\n> \n> AnnotationAssertion(\n>     Annotation(oboInOwl:hasDbXref \"PMID:xxx\") \n>     Annotation(oboInOwl:hasDbXref \"ECO:xxx\")\n>     obo:IAO_0000115 ex:my_term \"My definition\")\n> When really, the ECO:xxx should be an annotation on PMID:xxx.\n> \n> With the definition source (IAO:0000119), it ends up as:\n> \n> AnnotationAssertion(\n>     obo:IAO_0000115 ex:my_term \"My definition\")\n> AnnotationAssertion(\n>     Annotation(oboInOwl:hasDbXref \"ECO:xxx\")\n>     obo:IAO_0000119 ex:my_term \"PMID:xxx\")\n> See also the iao ticket I just linked\n> \n> Yeah, I think this is a good discussion to have.\n> \n> —\n> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.\n> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"lschriml"}}