{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spdk/spdk/issues/160","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spdk/spdk","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spdk/spdk/issues/160/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spdk/spdk/issues/160/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spdk/spdk/issues/160/events","html_url":"https://github.com/spdk/spdk/issues/160","id":228640757,"number":160,"title":"number of nvme io queues per subsystem","user":{"login":"eyuval","id":4947289,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/4947289?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyuval","html_url":"https://github.com/eyuval","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyuval/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyuval/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyuval/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyuval/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyuval/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyuval/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyuval/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyuval/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyuval/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":235898967,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spdk/spdk/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c","default":true}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2017-05-15T08:29:19Z","updated_at":"2018-02-01T09:24:41Z","closed_at":"2017-06-06T16:29:10Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"I am seriously confused. I see that the spdk_nvmf_subsystem structure has one io qpair in direct mode. On the other hand there may be multiple nvmf connections and rdma queues for this subsystem. Does this mean that these queues are multiplexed onto the same nvme queue? Do I need to define a separate subsystem for every nvme queue I want to use?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spdk/spdk/issues/comments/362207265","html_url":"https://github.com/spdk/spdk/issues/160#issuecomment-362207265","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/spdk/spdk/issues/160","id":362207265,"user":{"login":"zy-tough","id":5309274,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/5309274?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/zy-tough","html_url":"https://github.com/zy-tough","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zy-tough/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zy-tough/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zy-tough/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zy-tough/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zy-tough/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zy-tough/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zy-tough/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zy-tough/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zy-tough/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-02-01T09:24:41Z","updated_at":"2018-02-01T09:24:41Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"Another question, in NVMe over Fabrics Spec 7.3.3 Queue Mapping, it says a single IO submission queue and IO completion queue pair shall be mapped to a single RDMA queue pair. N:1 or 1:N is not supported. Does this conflict to \"Many RDMA queue pairs will be funneled into a single NVMe queue pair on the storage device\"? Thanks again."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"zy-tough"}}