{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nlrb/com.visonic.powermax/issues/29","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nlrb/com.visonic.powermax","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nlrb/com.visonic.powermax/issues/29/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nlrb/com.visonic.powermax/issues/29/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nlrb/com.visonic.powermax/issues/29/events","html_url":"https://github.com/nlrb/com.visonic.powermax/issues/29","id":389256902,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzODkyNTY5MDI=","number":29,"title":"[BOUNTY] Visonic SDK v2 Compatibility Work","user":{"login":"konradwalsh","id":7996482,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjc5OTY0ODI=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/7996482?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/konradwalsh","html_url":"https://github.com/konradwalsh","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/konradwalsh/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/konradwalsh/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/konradwalsh/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/konradwalsh/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/konradwalsh/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/konradwalsh/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/konradwalsh/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/konradwalsh/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/konradwalsh/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":8,"created_at":"2018-12-10T11:24:39Z","updated_at":"2018-12-29T11:33:31Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"I am hoping with this thread to provide the motivation for @nlrb to upgrade the Visonic app. He did a great job creating it. Now, it would be great for it to work with SDK v2.\r\nI have no idea how much work is involved, but without his app, my install is pretty useless with the new 2.0.\r\nTherefore, I would propose a bounty to assist him.\r\nI am offering €20 euro. If @nlrb comes back and says there is significant work then I will gladly up my bounty.\r\nAre there others willing to support this?\r\n\r\n\r\n**Bounty currently stands at**\r\n\r\n**€20 - Konrad Walsh** - @KonradWalsh \r\n**€20 - Raymondh** - @Raymond \r\n**€20 - jeroenvano** - @jeroenvano \r\n**€20 - MarcoRuiter** - @MarcoRuiter \r\n**€20 - Javier** - @jmieres\r\n**€20 - Gr. Remco** - @rhannink\r\n**Total - €120**\r\n\r\nhttps://community.athom.com/t/bounty-20-visonic-sdk-v2-compatibility-work/5242"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nlrb/com.visonic.powermax/issues/comments/450486409","html_url":"https://github.com/nlrb/com.visonic.powermax/issues/29#issuecomment-450486409","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nlrb/com.visonic.powermax/issues/29","id":450486409,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MDQ4NjQwOQ==","user":{"login":"nlrb","id":11725674,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjExNzI1Njc0","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/11725674?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nlrb","html_url":"https://github.com/nlrb","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nlrb/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nlrb/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nlrb/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nlrb/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nlrb/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nlrb/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nlrb/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nlrb/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nlrb/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-12-29T11:33:31Z","updated_at":"2018-12-29T11:33:31Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"Is it important to keep 100% backward compatibility? I'm thinking of moving all separate sensors (motion, magnet, smoke, etc.) into one sensor type. It still would look the same, but is different under the hood. Advantage would be e.g. that you can pair all sensors at once from one list. Downside would be that existing sensors would need to be removed and re-paired."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"nlrb"}}