{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/16","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/16/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/16/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/16/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/16","id":391755287,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzOTE3NTUyODc=","number":16,"title":"JavaScript standard library contents","user":{"login":"littledan","id":189835,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE4OTgzNQ==","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/189835?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan","html_url":"https://github.com/littledan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":39,"created_at":"2018-12-17T15:11:12Z","updated_at":"2018-12-21T05:36:42Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"MEMBER","body":"The JavaScript standard library is very minimal. Is this how it should be? What should we add?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/comments/449260601","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/16#issuecomment-449260601","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/issues/16","id":449260601,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTI2MDYwMQ==","user":{"login":"joelgallant","id":1429994,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE0Mjk5OTQ=","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/1429994?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/joelgallant","html_url":"https://github.com/joelgallant","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joelgallant/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joelgallant/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joelgallant/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joelgallant/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joelgallant/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joelgallant/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joelgallant/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joelgallant/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/joelgallant/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-12-21T05:36:42Z","updated_at":"2018-12-21T05:36:42Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"Is the intention to bring any existing standard library into this import style?\r\n\r\nI like this idea, but it would feel inconsistent if a subset of lodash, say, were to be added to the language in a different (import reserved path) way than others, like `Math`."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"joelgallant"}}