{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/HoTT/book/issues/980","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/HoTT/book","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/HoTT/book/issues/980/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/HoTT/book/issues/980/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/HoTT/book/issues/980/events","html_url":"https://github.com/HoTT/book/issues/980","id":313353133,"number":980,"title":"Missing inverse","user":{"login":"IanOrton","id":10424285,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/10424285?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/IanOrton","html_url":"https://github.com/IanOrton","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IanOrton/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IanOrton/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IanOrton/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IanOrton/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IanOrton/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IanOrton/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IanOrton/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IanOrton/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IanOrton/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-04-11T14:37:27Z","updated_at":"2018-04-11T14:37:27Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"In the definition of \\gamma in the proof that qinv(f) → isequiv(f) in Section 2, just after (2.4.10) I think \\beta should actually be \\beta^{-1}. Maybe not necessary to change in the centred displaymath (which is already simplified), but the explicit definition of \\gamma is currently incorrect."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"IanOrton"}}