{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90/events","html_url":"https://github.com/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90","id":134726609,"number":90,"title":"Add \"Partner Pool\" system","user":{"login":"brianjrobertson","id":12117751,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12117751?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson","html_url":"https://github.com/brianjrobertson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/labels/help%20wanted","name":"help wanted","color":"159818"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":11,"created_at":"2016-02-18T23:15:08Z","updated_at":"2016-03-16T17:54:53Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I've been working on Issue #77 and #78, and also looking for approaches to reinforce Holacracy's partner vs. employee paradigm, and resist (or at least help highlight) victim meaning-making patterns and projections on the company and other partners.\r\n\r\nWell, I've now got a very rough draft of a multi-faceted new system.  It needs more vetting, perhaps some more work, and likely trying it as a constitutional amendment within HolacracyOne for awhile.  But first, I'm posting it here for feedback. I'll attach the draft text below, and here's a [video walkthrough explaining the system](https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BymXxFXb0ha5cUZJUlpvSVExUHc/view?usp=sharing)."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/comments/197457875","html_url":"https://github.com/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90#issuecomment-197457875","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90","id":197457875,"user":{"login":"brianjrobertson","id":12117751,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12117751?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson","html_url":"https://github.com/brianjrobertson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-16T17:54:53Z","updated_at":"2016-03-16T17:54:53Z","body":"@dienkwik: I'm going through your comments now:\r\n\r\n1)  Agreed, I think \"People Pool\" works better.\r\n\r\n2)  Good questions, and I don't know; the GlassFrog team will be tackling these, and I hope they'll be able to come up with some cool approaches to make this simpler via good technology and visualization support.\r\n\r\n3)  Yes, it's effectively a parallel holarchy, but this is needed anyway (see issue #61) - there are a bunch of use-cases where two or more roles, circles, or entities might want to partner to form a joint-venture of sorts, with no single lead link or complete containment/ownership by any forming party.\r\n\r\n4)  You're spot-on; the goal of the company is to have a healthy partner pool, but not necessarily to satisfy every individual partner's desires - just like in a healthy human-to-human relationship, sometimes you just need to accept someone for who they are rather than try to change them, or accept that it's the wrong relationship if you can't do that and end it.\r\n\r\n5)  The intent is to allow partners to directly propose changes to their own relationship agreement in this case; they are representing themselves personally, and the partnership circle is representing the organization, and between the two parties they can agree to whatever makes sense to them, within any constraints acting upon the organization via governance of course.\r\n\r\n6)  Yes to all.\r\n\r\n7)  Yes to all.\r\n\r\n8)  Not quite; the elected partnership link from a sub-pool just gets to participate in the election for a link in the broader pool.\r\n\r\nHope that helps; let me know if it triggers any concerns or feedback..."}}