{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/VIC/issues/335","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/VIC/issues/335/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/VIC/issues/335/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/VIC/issues/335/events","html_url":"https://github.com/UW-Hydro/VIC/issues/335","id":124908019,"number":335,"title":"Water balance errors in 5.0 classic","user":{"login":"tbohn","id":3496314,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3496314?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn","html_url":"https://github.com/tbohn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":13,"created_at":"2016-01-05T06:45:05Z","updated_at":"2016-01-14T19:29:05Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I'm getting large cumulative water balance errors in 5.0 classic, in the development branch pre-sync/4.2.c.  I haven't finished investigating - there could be erroneous settings in my global parameter file.\r\n\r\nSome important details: I'm using a veg_library file that contains vegcover values.  The veg_parameter file also contains LAI, vegcover, and albedo climatologies for each grid cell.  I am not reading in veg_hist forcing files however.\r\n\r\nI will try some further tests with different global parameter file settings, to see if I can isolate the problem."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/VIC/issues/comments/171752327","html_url":"https://github.com/UW-Hydro/VIC/issues/335#issuecomment-171752327","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/VIC/issues/335","id":171752327,"user":{"login":"tbohn","id":3496314,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3496314?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn","html_url":"https://github.com/tbohn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tbohn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-01-14T19:29:05Z","updated_at":"2016-01-14T19:29:05Z","body":"Well, there's still some suspicious behavior that I'm looking into.  5.0 is computing slightly larger max moisture storage for the soil layers than 4.2 does - presumably these should be exactly the same given the same soil textures and thicknesses.  And 5.0's ET and Ra are different from 4.2, more than can be accounted for by the difference in max soil moisture storage.  So there may be a couple more bugs in there...  should I open a separate issue for these?"}}