{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/4229","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/4229/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/4229/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/4229/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bundler/bundler/pull/4229","id":128373719,"number":4229,"title":"Configure Code Climate exclusions","user":{"login":"RochesterinNYC","id":1504464,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1504464?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC","html_url":"https://github.com/RochesterinNYC","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2016-01-24T05:14:46Z","updated_at":"2016-01-26T15:50:42Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/pulls/4229","html_url":"https://github.com/bundler/bundler/pull/4229","diff_url":"https://github.com/bundler/bundler/pull/4229.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/bundler/bundler/pull/4229.patch"},"body":"This PR configures file exclusions for Code Climate test coverage analysis (which files we don't care about \"coverage\" on) and code analysis."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/comments/175086590","html_url":"https://github.com/bundler/bundler/pull/4229#issuecomment-175086590","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bundler/bundler/issues/4229","id":175086590,"user":{"login":"RochesterinNYC","id":1504464,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1504464?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC","html_url":"https://github.com/RochesterinNYC","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/RochesterinNYC/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-01-26T15:50:42Z","updated_at":"2016-01-26T15:50:42Z","body":"@segiddins so the issue is caused by CodeClimate not currently supporting the `inherit_from` command as per: https://buildpacks.ci.cf-app.com/pipelines/nodejs-buildpack/jobs/buildpack-CF-LTS/builds/45 So the exclusion `.rubocop.todo.yml` that we call `inherit_from` on in our `.rubocop.yml` is not considered in Code Climate's rubocop analysis.\r\n\r\nOne quick work around this might be to use the ability to specify a custom/different rubocop.yml file (one that's not named `.rubocop.yml` for the CodeClimate rubocop engine. We would create a `.code_climate_rubocop.yml` or something of that sort that includes the content from both our `.rubocop.todo.yml` and `.rubocop.yml`. Theoretically, since this `.code_climate_rubocop.yml` wouldn't need to use `inherit_from`, Code Climate's rubocop engine should process it (and our rubocop exclusions) properly. Thoughts?"}}