{"push_id":1201528801,"size":2,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/master-with-bazel","head":"52eead9af710c759d95ba4f16b8842707ceeeef6","before":"f7195668274049458b56441145c494eb182fdc7f","commits":[{"sha":"7944a9f008d8b6020c1b652a375f2e7b63644e09","author":{"name":"David Benjamin","email":"732e9177229740f757cac883f1aea417a06f67bd@google.com"},"message":"Account for key size when selecting RSA-PSS.\n\nRSASSA-PSS with SHA-512 is slightly too large for 1024-bit RSA. One\nshould not be using 1024-bit RSA, but it's common enough for tests\n(including our own in runner before they were regenerated), that we\nshould probably do the size check and avoid unnecessary turbulence to\neveryone else's test setups.\n\nChange-Id: If0c7e401d7d05404755cba4cbff76de3bc65c138\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8746\nReviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>\nReviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>\nCommit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>\nCQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>","distinct":false,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/google/boringssl/commits/7944a9f008d8b6020c1b652a375f2e7b63644e09"},{"sha":"52eead9af710c759d95ba4f16b8842707ceeeef6","author":{"name":"BoringSSL Robot","email":"cb716cbbc8931470dba3bad612654263ea4bc81d@gmail.com"},"message":"update master-with-bazel from master branch","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/google/boringssl/commits/52eead9af710c759d95ba4f16b8842707ceeeef6"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"agl"}}