{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puma/puma/issues/454","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puma/puma","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puma/puma/issues/454/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puma/puma/issues/454/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puma/puma/issues/454/events","html_url":"https://github.com/puma/puma/issues/454","id":27029633,"number":454,"title":"HTTP 2.0","user":{"login":"westonplatter","id":492603,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/492603?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/westonplatter","html_url":"https://github.com/westonplatter","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/westonplatter/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/westonplatter/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/westonplatter/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/westonplatter/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/westonplatter/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/westonplatter/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/westonplatter/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/westonplatter/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/westonplatter/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":9,"created_at":"2014-02-06T06:36:15Z","updated_at":"2016-03-25T12:27:06Z","closed_at":"2014-03-08T08:45:27Z","body":"I hope I'm not jumping the gun.\r\n\r\nI started to use Puma 2 weeks ago in production and love it.\r\n\r\nAnd so I wondered if HTTP 2.0 for Puma was on the feature list or maybe already in the works. After scanning the Github issues, I didn't find mention of HTTP 2.0. Therefore, I'm opening this issue to stir conversation regarding HTTP 2.0 features realizing they are far off, but still tantilizingly important.\r\n\r\nPossibly important questions: \r\n- when should (if at all) puma make the advancement to HTTP 2.0?\r\n- what features are easy to get working?\r\n- what featurs are the most painful?\r\n- are there outstanding Puma issues to solve first?\r\n- are there other HTTP 2.0 implementations to copy from?\r\n\r\nHappy to move the conversation else where if another communication channel is more appropriate. :)"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puma/puma/issues/comments/201262213","html_url":"https://github.com/puma/puma/issues/454#issuecomment-201262213","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/puma/puma/issues/454","id":201262213,"user":{"login":"deepj","id":33736,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/33736?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/deepj","html_url":"https://github.com/deepj","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/deepj/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/deepj/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/deepj/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/deepj/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/deepj/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/deepj/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/deepj/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/deepj/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/deepj/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-25T12:27:06Z","updated_at":"2016-03-25T12:27:06Z","body":"@evanphx Any plans to add HTTP/2 support into Puma in near future? It'd be worth having the support in those days."}}