{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rachelproject/rachelplus/issues/34","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rachelproject/rachelplus/issues/34/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rachelproject/rachelplus/issues/34/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rachelproject/rachelplus/issues/34/events","html_url":"https://github.com/rachelproject/rachelplus/issues/34","id":117199220,"number":34,"title":"Updating KA-Lite","user":{"login":"j-schwartz","id":9270388,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9270388?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz","html_url":"https://github.com/j-schwartz","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rachelproject/rachelplus/labels/cap","name":"cap","color":"fbca04"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rachelproject/rachelplus/labels/cap-rachel-configure","name":"cap-rachel-configure","color":"5319e7"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":50,"created_at":"2015-11-16T19:26:13Z","updated_at":"2016-01-29T22:32:59Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Currently, running the master script to update KA-Lite:\r\n\r\n```\r\nwget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rachelproject/rachelplus/master/cap-rachel-configure.sh \\\r\n-O /root/cap-rachel-configure.sh; bash /root/cap-rachel-configure.sh\r\n1 - online\r\n2 - install KA-Lite\r\n```\r\nwill result in the CAP attempting to redownload all videos from rachelfriends.org without the option to skip this step if the CAP already has them.  "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rachelproject/rachelplus/issues/comments/176999705","html_url":"https://github.com/rachelproject/rachelplus/issues/34#issuecomment-176999705","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rachelproject/rachelplus/issues/34","id":176999705,"user":{"login":"j-schwartz","id":9270388,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9270388?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz","html_url":"https://github.com/j-schwartz","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/j-schwartz/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-01-29T22:32:59Z","updated_at":"2016-01-29T22:32:59Z","body":"Totally agree with everything you've said, and on using 192.168.88.1 as the\nright thing to do.  I'll take the Gemtek convo off of GitHub here.\n\nOn Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:30 PM Sam Kinch <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n\n> That sounds like feedback that needs to go to Bun and Intel. Their product\n> is taking a turn for the worse in terms of production quality. There is no\n> issue with just using 192.168.88.1 - I would rather just use it. It is hard\n> coded into the gemtek code and that’s what I would have to figure out. Do\n> you want me to check on the feasibility of using 10.10.10.10 or just forgo\n> it for using the 192.168.88.1. Either way, it sounds like (from the various\n> feedback), to remove the 10.10.10.10 on currently deployed versions.\n>\n> —\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n> <https://github.com/rachelproject/rachelplus/issues/34#issuecomment-176998577>\n> .\n>\n"}}