{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ben-manes/caffeine/issues/73","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ben-manes/caffeine","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ben-manes/caffeine/issues/73/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ben-manes/caffeine/issues/73/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ben-manes/caffeine/issues/73/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/issues/73","id":151838769,"number":73,"title":"Special cache for long keys","user":{"login":"guidomedina","id":1789197,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1789197?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/guidomedina","html_url":"https://github.com/guidomedina","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guidomedina/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guidomedina/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guidomedina/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guidomedina/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guidomedina/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guidomedina/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guidomedina/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guidomedina/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guidomedina/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-04-29T10:40:54Z","updated_at":"2016-04-29T10:40:54Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi @ben-manes\r\n\r\nHave you consider a cache for long keys similar to https://github.com/JCTools/JCTools/blob/master/jctools-experimental/src/main/java/org/jctools/maps/NonBlockingHashMapLong.java\r\n\r\nIt got me curious to the point of believing that it may make sense due to boxing/unboxing, but by Java 10 we won't need to worry about it anymore?\r\n\r\nI think it would be worth having it only if it really makes a difference, say; low latency applications with pauseless GC requirements.\r\n\r\nWDTY?"}}