{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jackfirth/lens/issues/181","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jackfirth/lens","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jackfirth/lens/issues/181/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jackfirth/lens/issues/181/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jackfirth/lens/issues/181/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jackfirth/lens/issues/181","id":102853461,"number":181,"title":"Multi-package repo?","user":{"login":"jackfirth","id":8175575,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8175575?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jackfirth","html_url":"https://github.com/jackfirth","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jackfirth/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jackfirth/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jackfirth/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jackfirth/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jackfirth/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jackfirth/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jackfirth/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jackfirth/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jackfirth/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jackfirth/lens/labels/api","name":"api","color":"fbca04"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jackfirth/lens/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":23,"created_at":"2015-08-24T17:54:14Z","updated_at":"2016-08-22T22:44:22Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Should we follow the vein of the various main Racket package repos and split documentation, tests, unstable, base, and main into separate packages? I don't think it would be a good idea to separate docs and tests from code, but I like the idea of `lens/base`, `lens`, and `unstable/lens` being separately installable. This may be worth pursuing as the codebase gets larger."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jackfirth/lens/issues/comments/241574044","html_url":"https://github.com/jackfirth/lens/issues/181#issuecomment-241574044","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jackfirth/lens/issues/181","id":241574044,"user":{"login":"AlexKnauth","id":6600123,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6600123?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexKnauth","html_url":"https://github.com/AlexKnauth","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexKnauth/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexKnauth/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexKnauth/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexKnauth/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexKnauth/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexKnauth/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexKnauth/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexKnauth/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexKnauth/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-22T22:44:22Z","updated_at":"2016-08-22T22:44:22Z","body":"For modules, it makes sense to make them separate. But for packages? I think `lens-common` could be the package that includes the `lens/base` and `lens/common` modules"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"AlexKnauth"}}