{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sbstusa/analysisteam/issues/3","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sbstusa/analysisteam","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sbstusa/analysisteam/issues/3/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sbstusa/analysisteam/issues/3/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sbstusa/analysisteam/issues/3/events","html_url":"https://github.com/sbstusa/analysisteam/issues/3","id":168319467,"number":3,"title":"tsp2.0 reanalysis tasks","user":{"login":"jwbowers","id":569932,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/569932?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwbowers","html_url":"https://github.com/jwbowers","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwbowers/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwbowers/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwbowers/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwbowers/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwbowers/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwbowers/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwbowers/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwbowers/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwbowers/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sbstusa/analysisteam/labels/tsp%202.0%20reanalysis","name":"tsp 2.0 reanalysis","color":"bfdadc"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-07-29T13:00:33Z","updated_at":"2016-07-30T01:03:18Z","closed_at":null,"body":"- [ ] Assess/edit the abstract and design (write our own sense of the design and analysis, maybe some preliminary data setup and cleaning.)\r\n- [ ] Get comments from project owner \r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sbstusa/analysisteam/issues/comments/236328876","html_url":"https://github.com/sbstusa/analysisteam/issues/3#issuecomment-236328876","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sbstusa/analysisteam/issues/3","id":236328876,"user":{"login":"PTesta","id":642912,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/642912?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/PTesta","html_url":"https://github.com/PTesta","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/PTesta/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/PTesta/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/PTesta/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/PTesta/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/PTesta/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/PTesta/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/PTesta/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/PTesta/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/PTesta/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-30T01:03:18Z","updated_at":"2016-07-30T01:03:18Z","body":"- Exported the document into a google doc for shared editing\r\n- Created a \"tsp\" repo on github with some code looking at the data\r\n- Added comments to the current abstract and accepted most of tah96's edits which seemed sensible. It looks like the point estimates and intervals for the graph are not regression adjusted predictions but just straight up sample estimates, which I think makes more sense. Only thing would be to adjust for mutliple comparisons/ construct family wise confidence intervals...\r\n- Happy to write up comments and flesh out the tsp_reanalysis.Rmd; should I send them to Will Tucker or tah96 or Nate?\r\n\r\n\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"PTesta"}}