{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/trailblazer/roar/issues/202","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/trailblazer/roar","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/trailblazer/roar/issues/202/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/trailblazer/roar/issues/202/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/trailblazer/roar/issues/202/events","html_url":"https://github.com/trailblazer/roar/issues/202","id":183392824,"number":202,"title":"Release 1.1.0","user":{"login":"shaneog","id":130415,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/130415?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/shaneog","html_url":"https://github.com/shaneog","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shaneog/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shaneog/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shaneog/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shaneog/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shaneog/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shaneog/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shaneog/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shaneog/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shaneog/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2016-10-17T11:37:41Z","updated_at":"2016-12-23T18:58:36Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I see in the CHANGES file there is a version 1.1.0, but it's not on Rubygems - this is holding back Representable for me; which in turn is holding back Reform, etc.\n\nAny chance of a release compatible with Representable 3? 😄 \n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/trailblazer/roar/issues/comments/269031988","html_url":"https://github.com/trailblazer/roar/issues/202#issuecomment-269031988","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/trailblazer/roar/issues/202","id":269031988,"user":{"login":"myabc","id":755,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/755?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/myabc","html_url":"https://github.com/myabc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/myabc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/myabc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/myabc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/myabc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/myabc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/myabc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/myabc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/myabc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/myabc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-12-23T18:58:36Z","updated_at":"2016-12-23T18:58:36Z","body":"> Looks like you're only testing the decorator format, which isn't mentioned in the readme. Does it work?\r\n\r\n@carlthuringer correct. roar-jsonapi currently does not test Module representers, only Decorators. \r\n\r\n(I'm also able to reproduce the `NoMethodError: undefined method \\`type'` you mention)\r\n\r\nThe biggest problem here is documentation, which is currently badly out-of-sync with, what I consider to be, best practice. However, it is [our intention](https://github.com/trailblazer/roar/issues/208#issuecomment-268808987) to remove support for Module representers in the next major version.\r\n\r\nI recommend Decorators for all new **roar** projects. In the case, **roar-jsonapi** only Decorators will be supported. I'm sorry for the confusion.\r\n\r\nIf you want to help move things along, then patches updating `README` documentation examples are welcome.\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"myabc"}}