{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crehn/DesignType/issues/65","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crehn/DesignType","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crehn/DesignType/issues/65/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crehn/DesignType/issues/65/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crehn/DesignType/issues/65/events","html_url":"https://github.com/crehn/DesignType/issues/65","id":117445782,"number":65,"title":"Allow checking less than 5 statements for \"Assess Coelleagues\"","user":{"login":"crehn","id":1067517,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1067517?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn","html_url":"https://github.com/crehn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crehn/DesignType/milestones/17","html_url":"https://github.com/crehn/DesignType/milestones/Improve%20Assess%20Colleagues","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crehn/DesignType/milestones/17/labels","id":1416658,"number":17,"title":"Improve Assess Colleagues","description":"","creator":{"login":"crehn","id":1067517,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1067517?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn","html_url":"https://github.com/crehn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/crehn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":1,"closed_issues":1,"state":"open","created_at":"2015-11-17T20:43:25Z","updated_at":"2016-11-19T15:23:45Z","due_on":null,"closed_at":null},"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-11-17T20:43:01Z","updated_at":"2016-11-19T15:23:45Z","closed_at":"2016-11-19T15:23:45Z","body":"A user wrote:\n\n> Answering the questions for myself using the 4 Blocks was fine. But when I tried to asses colleagues I couldn't always check 5 answers for each pair of opposite types. Maybe you should honour tendencies as well. Would be good to have more answers here - sometimes there where only 5 per type but I had only 3 or 4 of them applying to my colleague - the answers of the other type where quite \"wrong\" characterizations of him in my opinion.\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crehn/DesignType/issues/comments/261720006","html_url":"https://github.com/crehn/DesignType/issues/65#issuecomment-261720006","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crehn/DesignType/issues/65","id":261720006,"user":{"login":"MattSkyJumper","id":7963918,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7963918?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/MattSkyJumper","html_url":"https://github.com/MattSkyJumper","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MattSkyJumper/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MattSkyJumper/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MattSkyJumper/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MattSkyJumper/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MattSkyJumper/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MattSkyJumper/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MattSkyJumper/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MattSkyJumper/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MattSkyJumper/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-11-19T15:23:45Z","updated_at":"2016-11-19T15:23:45Z","body":"Fixed it - now a simple majority is sufficient. But I duplicated the questionaire js file. This is not nice but the solution before neither (too complex to read). I will create a refactor issue."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"MattSkyJumper"}}