{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yargs/yargs/issues/468","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yargs/yargs","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yargs/yargs/issues/468/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yargs/yargs/issues/468/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yargs/yargs/issues/468/events","html_url":"https://github.com/yargs/yargs/issues/468","id":146243573,"number":468,"title":"Yargs is no longer lighweight.","user":{"login":"osher","id":803101,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/803101?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/osher","html_url":"https://github.com/osher","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/osher/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/osher/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/osher/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/osher/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/osher/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/osher/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/osher/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/osher/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/osher/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-04-06T09:07:10Z","updated_at":"2016-04-10T19:35:13Z","closed_at":"2016-04-10T19:35:13Z","body":"It started as lightweight, and was very cool (and still is).\r\nBut it's not lightweight.\r\n\r\nOnce installed, the size of a package including all its dependencies:\r\n\r\nYargs@4.4.0:  \r\n -  990Kb \r\n - (418 files, 123 folders)\r\n\r\nnomnom@1.8.1:\r\n- 115K\r\n- (35 files, 9 folders)\r\n\r\nCommander@2.9.0:\r\n -   40Kb\r\n - (11 files, 2 folders)\r\n\r\nahm... :(\r\n\r\nI was advocating for it, and was corrected by my listeners\r\nIt's not lightweight. It's ritch with features.\r\n\r\nSince I don't think we should drop functionality, I suggest to correct the misleading description..."}}