{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LLNL/RAJA/issues/53","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LLNL/RAJA","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LLNL/RAJA/issues/53/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LLNL/RAJA/issues/53/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LLNL/RAJA/issues/53/events","html_url":"https://github.com/LLNL/RAJA/pull/53","id":159844264,"number":53,"title":"add a portable c++11-based timer and refactor timer selection","user":{"login":"trws","id":660149,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/660149?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws","html_url":"https://github.com/trws","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":9,"created_at":"2016-06-12T19:48:49Z","updated_at":"2016-06-17T18:06:46Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LLNL/RAJA/pulls/53","html_url":"https://github.com/LLNL/RAJA/pull/53","diff_url":"https://github.com/LLNL/RAJA/pull/53.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/LLNL/RAJA/pull/53.patch"},"body":"This adds a c++11 timer as discussed in issue #40.  It also refactors the timer selection somewhat.  I'm not sure what's best by way of a default here, chrono is most portable, but the unfortunately ancient versions of the C++ standard library floating around don't support all of it.  Maybe it's worth adding a configure-time test?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LLNL/RAJA/issues/comments/226840286","html_url":"https://github.com/LLNL/RAJA/pull/53#issuecomment-226840286","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LLNL/RAJA/issues/53","id":226840286,"user":{"login":"trws","id":660149,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/660149?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws","html_url":"https://github.com/trws","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/trws/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-06-17T18:06:46Z","updated_at":"2016-06-17T18:06:46Z","body":"I generally prefer that also.  The odd pattern of using the cmake properties has one additional benefit, in that ccmake and similar will only display the options that are listed in the property.  In fact, the graphical should show it as a drop-down menu rather than an editable string."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"trws"}}