{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ejeschke/ginga/issues/367","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ejeschke/ginga","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ejeschke/ginga/issues/367/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ejeschke/ginga/issues/367/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ejeschke/ginga/issues/367/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ejeschke/ginga/pull/367","id":170064136,"number":367,"title":"Initial simple changes to use qtpy package for Qt version abstraction","user":{"login":"ejeschke","id":1305473,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1305473?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke","html_url":"https://github.com/ejeschke","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-08-09T01:46:52Z","updated_at":"2016-08-09T01:49:41Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ejeschke/ginga/pulls/367","html_url":"https://github.com/ejeschke/ginga/pull/367","diff_url":"https://github.com/ejeschke/ginga/pull/367.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/ejeschke/ginga/pull/367.patch"},"body":"This PR addresses issue #348.  There is more to be done, including removing code-specific tests for qt5/qt4, but this one change implements most of the work."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ejeschke/ginga/issues/comments/238430899","html_url":"https://github.com/ejeschke/ginga/pull/367#issuecomment-238430899","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ejeschke/ginga/issues/367","id":238430899,"user":{"login":"ejeschke","id":1305473,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1305473?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke","html_url":"https://github.com/ejeschke","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejeschke/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-09T01:49:41Z","updated_at":"2016-08-09T01:49:41Z","body":"@astrofrog, is it true that you can basically ignore any qt4/qt5 distinctions and write straight to the qt5 api?  I'm wondering also whether `qtpy` automatically will try to use the qt4 v2 api when it is available (I hope so)?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ejeschke"}}