{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aurelia/skeleton-navigation/issues/344","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aurelia/skeleton-navigation","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aurelia/skeleton-navigation/issues/344/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aurelia/skeleton-navigation/issues/344/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aurelia/skeleton-navigation/issues/344/events","html_url":"https://github.com/aurelia/skeleton-navigation/issues/344","id":140405863,"number":344,"title":"Extending the es2016-webpack sample to use Aurelia-KendoUI bridge fails","user":{"login":"adriatic","id":2712405,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2712405?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic","html_url":"https://github.com/adriatic","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":11,"created_at":"2016-03-12T18:40:50Z","updated_at":"2016-03-29T13:21:29Z","closed_at":null,"body":"After spending so much time with jspm / systemjs based tooling, I might be missing something obvious in order to solve my problem, defined as:\r\n\r\nrunning `npm install aurelia-kendoui-bridge` with the intent to add the bridge to the es2016-webpack sample, results with adding the `aurelia-kendoui-bridge` to node_modules folder, as shown below:\r\n\r\n![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2712405/13724569/aa7f7cf0-e857-11e5-968c-cf3e10cb5f6d.png)\r\n\r\nThis works because `aurelia-kendoui-bridge` is registered in npm registry\r\n\r\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/aurelia-kendoui-bridge\r\n\r\nHowever, it is expected to be fetched by jspm (not npm) which explains why the whole content of Aurelia-KendoUI bridge repository was added to node_modules"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aurelia/skeleton-navigation/issues/comments/202890765","html_url":"https://github.com/aurelia/skeleton-navigation/issues/344#issuecomment-202890765","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/aurelia/skeleton-navigation/issues/344","id":202890765,"user":{"login":"adriatic","id":2712405,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2712405?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic","html_url":"https://github.com/adriatic","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/adriatic/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-29T13:21:29Z","updated_at":"2016-03-29T13:21:29Z","body":"@ralexand56 - this last issue - https://github.com/aurelia-ui-toolkits/aurelia-kendoui-bridge/issues/437 is the current show-stopper. The [workaround](https://github.com/aurelia-ui-toolkits/aurelia-kendoui-bridge/issues/437#issuecomment-202148351) suggested by @martijnboland may not be acceptable to most Aurelians - so unless there is some alternative approach possible, I am not sure what could be done without changing the css files loading practice used with jspm / systemjs tooling"}}