{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fsharp/FSharp.Compiler.Service/issues/516","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fsharp/FSharp.Compiler.Service","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fsharp/FSharp.Compiler.Service/issues/516/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fsharp/FSharp.Compiler.Service/issues/516/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fsharp/FSharp.Compiler.Service/issues/516/events","html_url":"https://github.com/fsharp/FSharp.Compiler.Service/issues/516","id":127634262,"number":516,"title":"[Feature Request] Add Compile* methods from SimpleSourceCodeServices to SourceCodeServices to unify API","user":{"login":"7sharp9","id":588746,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/588746?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/7sharp9","html_url":"https://github.com/7sharp9","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/7sharp9/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/7sharp9/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/7sharp9/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/7sharp9/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/7sharp9/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/7sharp9/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/7sharp9/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/7sharp9/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/7sharp9/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/fsharp/FSharp.Compiler.Service/labels/feature%20request","name":"feature request","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-01-20T09:02:18Z","updated_at":"2016-10-13T14:40:39Z","closed_at":"2016-10-13T14:40:39Z","body":"#362 Discusses this\r\n\r\nEssentially Compile and CompileToDynamicAssembly methods should be brought over from SimpleSourceCodeService to SourceCodeServices.\r\n\r\n@dsyme In #362 you mention arguments should be textual to conform with the rest of the API, which methods were you referring to?\r\n\r\nAlso to provision a PR to add this feature would you be happy with adding the compile helpers to a module within Services.fs so that SimpleSourceCodeServices and SourceCodeServices share the common implementation?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"dsyme"}}