{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/duraspace/pcdm/issues/70","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/duraspace/pcdm","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/duraspace/pcdm/issues/70/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/duraspace/pcdm/issues/70/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/duraspace/pcdm/issues/70/events","html_url":"https://github.com/duraspace/pcdm/issues/70","id":192016741,"number":70,"title":"Embargo predicates","user":{"login":"bcail","id":2394596,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2394596?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcail","html_url":"https://github.com/bcail","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcail/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcail/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcail/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcail/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcail/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcail/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcail/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcail/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcail/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":10,"created_at":"2016-11-28T14:16:31Z","updated_at":"2016-12-01T16:18:51Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Should embargo/lease predicates be added to PCDM? See initial discussion at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pcdm/d1W6IeqbLfM. If embargo predicates are added, it might be useful to add examples to the wiki for how to use the rights extension and the new embargo predicates."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/duraspace/pcdm/issues/comments/264217763","html_url":"https://github.com/duraspace/pcdm/issues/70#issuecomment-264217763","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/duraspace/pcdm/issues/70","id":264217763,"user":{"login":"escowles","id":856924,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/856924?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/escowles","html_url":"https://github.com/escowles","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/escowles/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/escowles/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/escowles/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/escowles/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/escowles/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/escowles/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/escowles/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/escowles/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/escowles/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-12-01T16:18:51Z","updated_at":"2016-12-01T16:18:51Z","body":"I'm skeptical of making embargoes their own resources.  That would be useful for handling multiple embargoes, but in most of the cases of multiple embargoes that I've heard (including the [stacking](https://github.com/duraspace/pcdm/issues/70#issuecomment-263297577) comment above), I think one is an embargo, but the permanent campus-only status is the base rights/access status, not an embargo.\r\n\r\nI would be more in favor of articulating the properties that apply to the embargo and seeing if we can attach them directly to the primary resource.  "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"escowles"}}