{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zooniverse/Panoptes-Front-End/issues/2077","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zooniverse/Panoptes-Front-End/issues/2077/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zooniverse/Panoptes-Front-End/issues/2077/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zooniverse/Panoptes-Front-End/issues/2077/events","html_url":"https://github.com/zooniverse/Panoptes-Front-End/issues/2077","id":125153703,"number":2077,"title":"Feature request - retire mode","user":{"login":"khufkens","id":1354258,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1354258?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/khufkens","html_url":"https://github.com/khufkens","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/khufkens/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/khufkens/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/khufkens/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/khufkens/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/khufkens/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/khufkens/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/khufkens/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/khufkens/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/khufkens/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-01-06T10:46:02Z","updated_at":"2016-01-12T20:26:49Z","closed_at":null,"body":"We now have a gold standard and a demo mode.\r\n\r\nHowever, I was wondering if it wouldn't speed up some of the projects if you would have a retire mode. Where if you are a the owner or expert on a project you can prematurely retire or weight a classification more heavily (bounce the classification number artificially to a % of the retire rate) for a subject.\r\n\r\ne.g. if I classify a subject the classification count will jump to 8 of 10 classifications needed. Two people then confirm my work (in case I missed something I guess) for a subject to retire. Or set it to 100% so when an 'expert' classifies something the subject drops out.\r\n\r\nThis would also allow you to for example pay trained people to work on a project in conjunction with citizen scientists. Or speed up things as an expert / owner by classifying with more weight (as you know the data best)."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zooniverse/Panoptes-Front-End/issues/comments/171044026","html_url":"https://github.com/zooniverse/Panoptes-Front-End/issues/2077#issuecomment-171044026","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zooniverse/Panoptes-Front-End/issues/2077","id":171044026,"user":{"login":"ggdhines","id":6626461,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6626461?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ggdhines","html_url":"https://github.com/ggdhines","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ggdhines/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ggdhines/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ggdhines/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ggdhines/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ggdhines/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ggdhines/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ggdhines/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ggdhines/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ggdhines/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-01-12T20:26:49Z","updated_at":"2016-01-12T20:26:49Z","body":"@chrislintott  we already have the API ability to retire subjects on demand (I use it for Annotate and Folger). @khufkens  you can download a dump your classifications and do your own analysis to determine which subjects you want to retire. I can share the API code with you but I just realized that the dump won't include anything that allows you to identify the users (e.g. email address or user id or ip address), each user is only identified by a number. \r\nI think changing that would would take a lot of effort and break several things, in particular our policy about the information we make public about users. \r\nA custom aggregation job would not be trivial. I don't have the time and don't want to set a precedent. \r\n "}}