{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gilbarbara/react-joyride/issues/128","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gilbarbara/react-joyride","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gilbarbara/react-joyride/issues/128/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gilbarbara/react-joyride/issues/128/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gilbarbara/react-joyride/issues/128/events","html_url":"https://github.com/gilbarbara/react-joyride/issues/128","id":181375458,"number":128,"title":"step:before event on continuous type","user":{"login":"Joey92","id":1710957,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1710957?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Joey92","html_url":"https://github.com/Joey92","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Joey92/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Joey92/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Joey92/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Joey92/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Joey92/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Joey92/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Joey92/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Joey92/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Joey92/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-10-06T10:14:34Z","updated_at":"2016-12-13T01:27:06Z","closed_at":"2016-12-13T01:27:06Z","body":"Currently the callback with `step:before` is only called when you click on the beacon.\nI have a continuous joyride and need a pre-step as well.\n\nCurrently there is 1 `step:before` event emitted on a continuous joyride and only `step:after` events for each step after.\n\nThe current event `step:before` should be named to `beacon:click` or so. `step:before` should be emitted even for continuous on each step, since it represents some kind of pre-opening of a step.\n\nThese would be breaking changes though for each implementation using it how it currently is.\n\nWhat do you think?\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"gilbarbara"}}