{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geojson/geojson.github.io/issues/20","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geojson/geojson.github.io","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geojson/geojson.github.io/issues/20/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geojson/geojson.github.io/issues/20/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geojson/geojson.github.io/issues/20/events","html_url":"https://github.com/geojson/geojson.github.io/issues/20","id":172705746,"number":20,"title":"Mark geojson spec as replaced by RFC 7946","user":{"login":"sgillies","id":33697,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/33697?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sgillies","html_url":"https://github.com/sgillies","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sgillies/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sgillies/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sgillies/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sgillies/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sgillies/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sgillies/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sgillies/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sgillies/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sgillies/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-08-23T13:55:22Z","updated_at":"2016-08-24T11:38:14Z","closed_at":"2016-08-24T11:38:14Z","body":"@mpdaly points out that people can arrive at http://geojson.org/geojson-spec.html and not get a clue that RFC 7946 is the latest spec. I propose to add a \"status: replaced by RFC 7946\" entry to the table at the top of the spec page and leave the spec text untouched. Okay?\r\n\r\n@tschaub @hobu @adoyle "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"sgillies"}}