{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timholy/Images.jl/issues/533","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timholy/Images.jl","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timholy/Images.jl/issues/533/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timholy/Images.jl/issues/533/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timholy/Images.jl/issues/533/events","html_url":"https://github.com/timholy/Images.jl/pull/533","id":168538158,"number":533,"title":"Add support for N-dimensional arrays in imgradients","user":{"login":"juliohm","id":3345261,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3345261?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm","html_url":"https://github.com/juliohm","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":17,"created_at":"2016-07-31T21:03:20Z","updated_at":"2016-08-16T13:00:45Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timholy/Images.jl/pulls/533","html_url":"https://github.com/timholy/Images.jl/pull/533","diff_url":"https://github.com/timholy/Images.jl/pull/533.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/timholy/Images.jl/pull/533.patch"},"body":"This pull request is incomplete.\r\n\r\n@timholy could you please guide me on fixing the tests on the `Image` types?\r\n\r\nThe only difference between this N-dimensional implementation compared to the previous 2D code is that the output is flipped: \"grady, gradx\" instead of \"gradx, grady\". The first dimension is vertical (rows), the second dimension is horizontal (columns), and so on...\r\n\r\nAfter all tests pass, I will profile the code further and update the docs."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timholy/Images.jl/issues/comments/240094097","html_url":"https://github.com/timholy/Images.jl/pull/533#issuecomment-240094097","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timholy/Images.jl/issues/533","id":240094097,"user":{"login":"juliohm","id":3345261,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3345261?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm","html_url":"https://github.com/juliohm","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/juliohm/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-16T13:00:45Z","updated_at":"2016-08-16T13:00:45Z","body":"Hi Tim, I fixed the issue with `edges.data`.\r\n\r\nI am still wondering if we can get rid of this \"special\" case with `spatialorder`? Most active `Images.jl` contributors favored the removal of this weird MATLAB convention,  should we keep it? If we don't remove it now, it will be tricky to remove it in the future when `Images.jl` becomes the best package for image processing in the world :)"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"juliohm"}}