{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/scalaz/scalaz/issues/1128","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/scalaz/scalaz","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/scalaz/scalaz/issues/1128/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/scalaz/scalaz/issues/1128/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/scalaz/scalaz/issues/1128/events","html_url":"https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz/pull/1128","id":141109874,"number":1128,"title":"revert deletion in favor of deprecation","user":{"login":"tpolecat","id":1200131,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1200131?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tpolecat","html_url":"https://github.com/tpolecat","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tpolecat/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tpolecat/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tpolecat/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tpolecat/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tpolecat/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tpolecat/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tpolecat/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tpolecat/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tpolecat/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":16,"created_at":"2016-03-15T21:52:36Z","updated_at":"2016-03-16T23:03:49Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/scalaz/scalaz/pulls/1128","html_url":"https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz/pull/1128","diff_url":"https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz/pull/1128.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz/pull/1128.patch"},"body":"This reverts 8fd1b3b and adds deprecation notices. I think it's important not to break source compatibility without a deprecation cycle.\r\n\r\nMany scalaz users (including me) need to interact with side-effect APIs and this method ends up being useful, but I'm fine removing it as long as there's some warning. Others may want to object generally.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/scalaz/scalaz/issues/comments/197595557","html_url":"https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz/pull/1128#issuecomment-197595557","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/scalaz/scalaz/issues/1128","id":197595557,"user":{"login":"vmarquez","id":427578,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/427578?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/vmarquez","html_url":"https://github.com/vmarquez","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vmarquez/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vmarquez/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vmarquez/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vmarquez/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vmarquez/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vmarquez/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vmarquez/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vmarquez/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vmarquez/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-16T23:03:49Z","updated_at":"2016-03-16T23:03:49Z","body":"I agree with @S11001001. It makes the most sense, let's deprecate in the 7.2 release cycle and just remove it in 7.3. "}}