{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/underworldcode/underworld2/issues/24","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/underworldcode/underworld2","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/underworldcode/underworld2/issues/24/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/underworldcode/underworld2/issues/24/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/underworldcode/underworld2/issues/24/events","html_url":"https://github.com/underworldcode/underworld2/issues/24","id":113461563,"number":24,"title":"Publications !","user":{"login":"lmoresi","id":12588963,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12588963?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/lmoresi","html_url":"https://github.com/lmoresi","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lmoresi/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lmoresi/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lmoresi/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lmoresi/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lmoresi/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lmoresi/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lmoresi/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lmoresi/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lmoresi/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-10-26T22:07:46Z","updated_at":"2016-04-19T22:04:16Z","closed_at":"2016-04-19T22:04:16Z","body":"The publications directory should reproduce results that other people have done with Underworld. I think it is ok to have benchmarks too, but I think we should be quite specific. \r\n\r\nIn the Arrhenius example, the notebook reproduces figure 1a of that M&S paper. I would note that the Ra is supposed to be 10^7 with \\Delta\\eta 3.10^4 and the viscosity is the Frank-Kamenetskii linearlised form. Even though this is a bit old fashioned, for reproducibility I suggest doing the same !  And then show how to do Fig 1b !\r\n\r\nI would also recommend not calling the mesh linearMesh when using Q2 elements.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n"}}