{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mauricio/postgresql-async/issues/189","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mauricio/postgresql-async","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mauricio/postgresql-async/issues/189/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mauricio/postgresql-async/issues/189/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mauricio/postgresql-async/issues/189/events","html_url":"https://github.com/mauricio/postgresql-async/issues/189","id":167608394,"number":189,"title":"Use Java 8 date/time APIs instead of Joda Time","user":{"login":"povder","id":16050375,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16050375?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/povder","html_url":"https://github.com/povder","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/povder/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/povder/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/povder/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/povder/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/povder/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/povder/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/povder/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/povder/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/povder/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-07-26T13:34:35Z","updated_at":"2016-10-26T09:57:16Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@mauricio what do you think about using Java 8 date/time APIs instead of Joda Time library? The fix itself should be easy I think, but the decision has to be made ;)"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mauricio/postgresql-async/issues/comments/256302219","html_url":"https://github.com/mauricio/postgresql-async/issues/189#issuecomment-256302219","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mauricio/postgresql-async/issues/189","id":256302219,"user":{"login":"mdedetrich","id":2337269,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2337269?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mdedetrich","html_url":"https://github.com/mdedetrich","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mdedetrich/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mdedetrich/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mdedetrich/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mdedetrich/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mdedetrich/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mdedetrich/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mdedetrich/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mdedetrich/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mdedetrich/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-26T09:57:16Z","updated_at":"2016-10-26T09:57:16Z","body":"I would go down the route that Play which, which is to make the default implementation of time to be JDK8, but provide a module for JodaTime\r\n\r\nThe issue with having JodaTime as a hard dependency is you introduce the possibility of binary incompatibility issues. The problem is even more pronounced when you are supporting old versions of Scala (i.e. 2.11) which are more likely to be running a more outdated version of JodaTime.\r\n\r\nAnother possibility is to simply have the Scala 2.12 build only use JDK8 Date"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"mdedetrich"}}