{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openhealthcare/elcid/issues/949","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openhealthcare/elcid","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openhealthcare/elcid/issues/949/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openhealthcare/elcid/issues/949/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openhealthcare/elcid/issues/949/events","html_url":"https://github.com/openhealthcare/elcid/issues/949","id":132119994,"number":949,"title":"Add haem-related audit tick boxes in CA modal","user":{"login":"GabPoll","id":4605661,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4605661?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll","html_url":"https://github.com/GabPoll","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openhealthcare/elcid/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-02-08T11:39:17Z","updated_at":"2016-02-11T15:50:31Z","closed_at":null,"body":"In v0.6 these are still present for clinical advice modal in ID liaison. Not present in Walkin doctor CA. Unable to test in patient details view due to #915.\r\n\r\nIdeally we would have checkboxes appear (e.g \"neutropaenic today\" - Y/N) only if select \"Micro haem ward round\" or \"Micro-haem telephone\"). Is this trivial? I have no idea. In practice though, if the \"neutropaenic?\" tick box was present for all patients would not be a problem - it's just that only vanya would tick it.\r\n\r\nThis is an idea (with some merit) from VG to replace #948."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openhealthcare/elcid/issues/comments/182926928","html_url":"https://github.com/openhealthcare/elcid/issues/949#issuecomment-182926928","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openhealthcare/elcid/issues/949","id":182926928,"user":{"login":"GabPoll","id":4605661,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4605661?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll","html_url":"https://github.com/GabPoll","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/GabPoll/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-11T15:50:31Z","updated_at":"2016-02-11T15:50:31Z","body":"of all the VG suggestions, this seems the least complicated as a short term data capture exercise (replacing #948) prior to integration of neutrophil counts from winpath. I wonder whether this is easy / achievable for v0.6.\r\n\r\nGiven that checkboxes appear in some but not all CAs, I don't know how simple this is. Would be acceptable for this to be a checkbox visible in all CA, I'd think, not just if select haem consult.\r\n\r\nQuestion is to @fredkingham & @davidmiller . Thoughts from @michaeledwardmarks always welcome but not absolutely required! "}}