{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evidenceaction/DataDashboard-Dispensers/issues/14","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evidenceaction/DataDashboard-Dispensers","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evidenceaction/DataDashboard-Dispensers/issues/14/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evidenceaction/DataDashboard-Dispensers/issues/14/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/evidenceaction/DataDashboard-Dispensers/issues/14/events","html_url":"https://github.com/evidenceaction/DataDashboard-Dispensers/issues/14","id":143572092,"number":14,"title":"Deliverable Feedback Followup","user":{"login":"bchen10","id":15217157,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/15217157?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bchen10","html_url":"https://github.com/bchen10","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bchen10/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bchen10/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bchen10/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bchen10/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bchen10/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bchen10/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bchen10/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bchen10/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bchen10/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-03-25T19:08:08Z","updated_at":"2016-03-25T19:08:08Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@katrinskaya,\r\n\r\nThanks for your feedback and getting us the copy we need. We've consolidated our thoughts and responses to your questions below. Feel free to reach out if you have additional questions or comments about how we move forward. \r\n\r\n# Addressing feedback: \r\n\r\n> Can we separate the people served and dispensers installed into separate rows, please - they look cramped as is. Also - in the people served graph, what is the number in parentheses (x numner of people new) - new to what? Not clear. \r\n\r\nWe intentionally positioned the charts side-by-side because the graph and map are meant to be viewed together. The unique aspect of having the two next two each other is that the data in one graphic reflects the other. In a stacked view, the correlation won't be as strong, and it's important that the user is making the connection here. We can solve for the cramped feeling by increasing the spacing between the two charts in this first section (as showed below).\r\n\r\nThe \"new\" means the number of _new_ people served. To clarify this more, we will label the first number as \"Total\" and we'll change \"new\" to \"a month\" to give the user a better idea of new growth per month. \r\n\r\n![acess_chart](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/15217157/14051531/20406110-f29a-11e5-9cf6-1765e6341016.jpg)\r\n\r\n> Despencer reliability: Still not loving it…. Can we use different colors? Put the negative below the x-axis? It’s not intuitive the way it’s configured right now.\r\n\r\nWe've provided another solution in reliability chart issue: #13. Feel free to respond with thoughts in that ticket.\r\n\r\n> Adoption rate: Can we please lose the stripes? Asked for that before - not clear why this is divided into thirds.\r\n\r\nThe stripes reflect the conversation we had at our office about DSW' good use rates. In the example below we have put labels in the shaded areas so that clarifies the sections. Incorporating these thresholds gives the user an idea of how well the adoption rate is. The averages are configurable, so you can change those numbers according to your preference.  \r\n\r\n![adoptionrate](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/15217157/14030843/27e5fdf4-f1e0-11e5-9bac-966833c2c31f.jpg)\r\n\r\n> Can you delineate when Uganda and Malawi were certified with a marker (2013 and 2014) so there is no question why there is a 0 before certification.\r\n\r\nYes, we’re going to add a note by each of the dates in the x-axis to show when uganda and malawi were certified.\r\n\r\n# Integration\r\n\r\n### Handoff\r\n\r\nTo ensure a smooth transition on the 30th we will need you to answer the following questions by end of day Monday: \r\n\r\n- Is there a specific site title we should be using?\r\n- Any text on privacy policy or legal disclaimers to include in the bottom footer?\r\n- Is there an email you'd want us to direct people's attention towards?\r\n- Is there anybody in the organization we should be coordinating the technical aspects of this with?\r\n\r\nOn the 30th, we will provide you with a writeup explaining how to edit the content. We will also start the process of transitioning the codebase to your Github organization, and the hosting to a Heroku account controlled by Evidence Action. Please let us know who to contact so we can organize the above actions during transition. \r\n\r\nLet's also setup some time after the 30th to meet in person and we can do a quick run through on how to edit the contents of the site and answer any remaining questions in person. \r\n\r\nWe hope you have a lovely weekend and we're looking forward to hearing from you on Monday. \r\n\r\ncc: @olafveerman @ascalamogna @danielfdsilva \r\n "}}