{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/931","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xianyi/OpenBLAS","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/931/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/931/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/931/events","html_url":"https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/931","id":167192886,"number":931,"title":"OpenBlas crashes on Xeon processors","user":{"login":"ninja65","id":2056198,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2056198?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65","html_url":"https://github.com/ninja65","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":14,"created_at":"2016-07-23T16:54:44Z","updated_at":"2016-07-27T09:18:54Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I have just rebuild the source with the default settings (on another computer). The new dll crashes on Xeon processor and 64 bit windows. (like the old prebuilt binaries). Does anybody have an idea?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/comments/235532561","html_url":"https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/931#issuecomment-235532561","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/931","id":235532561,"user":{"login":"ninja65","id":2056198,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2056198?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65","html_url":"https://github.com/ninja65","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ninja65/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-27T09:18:54Z","updated_at":"2016-07-27T09:18:54Z","body":"It can be corrected easiliy? What do you think?\n\n\nOn Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Csaba Hajdu <cshajdu.prx@gmail.com> wrote:\n\n> But it should use the workarray if provided, I think.\n>\n>\n> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Martin Kroeker <notifications@github.com\n> > wrote:\n>\n>> I have not used the lapacke interface myself, but from a quick glance at\n>> the source it feels like lapacke_dgesdd does not work that way - it seems\n>> to always allocate the work arrays (and query dgesdd_work for the necessary\n>> size) itself, no matter if you already passed in a preallocated block.\n>>\n>> —\n>> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.\n>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub\n>> <https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/931#issuecomment-235532053>,\n>> or mute the thread\n>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB9gBudXZSnMca-Lf84A2KgZ8DHlAmcKks5qZyH8gaJpZM4JTZXl>\n>> .\n>>\n>\n>\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ninja65"}}