{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CityofPittsburgh/pittsburgh-purchasing-suite/issues/84","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CityofPittsburgh/pittsburgh-purchasing-suite","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CityofPittsburgh/pittsburgh-purchasing-suite/issues/84/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CityofPittsburgh/pittsburgh-purchasing-suite/issues/84/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CityofPittsburgh/pittsburgh-purchasing-suite/issues/84/events","html_url":"https://github.com/CityofPittsburgh/pittsburgh-purchasing-suite/issues/84","id":163381079,"number":84,"title":"two contracts not showing up in conductor","user":{"login":"rileystewart","id":12427992,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12427992?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart","html_url":"https://github.com/rileystewart","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-07-01T11:59:01Z","updated_at":"2016-07-01T13:48:42Z","closed_at":"2016-07-01T12:36:29Z","body":"specs 7396 and spec 7552 are not showing up in conductor.\r\n\r\nIf this is once again tied to the parent/child thing then I think we need to unlink them.  This seems to be causing more issues than it is helping.  "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CityofPittsburgh/pittsburgh-purchasing-suite/issues/comments/229951413","html_url":"https://github.com/CityofPittsburgh/pittsburgh-purchasing-suite/issues/84#issuecomment-229951413","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CityofPittsburgh/pittsburgh-purchasing-suite/issues/84","id":229951413,"user":{"login":"rileystewart","id":12427992,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12427992?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart","html_url":"https://github.com/rileystewart","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rileystewart/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-01T13:48:42Z","updated_at":"2016-07-01T13:48:42Z","body":"I'm just saying that archived right now is two different things(one for conductor and one for scout)\n\nI would prefer anything removed from conductor, whether it is in progress or in the all contracts when removed to result in \"removed from conductor\" status.  It would then disappear from the admin>conductor>contracts list but still be in the admin>scout>contracts list with the \"visible in conductor\" box unchecked.  If someone picked \"remove from conductor and scout\" the same would happen except it would also check the archived box in admin>scout>contracts.\n\nI understand that this means that when someone selects remove from conductor that wherever the contract was in progress will be removed but I am okay with that.\n\nRiley R. Stewart\n\n> On Jul 1, 2016, at 9:26 AM, Ben Smithgall <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n> \n> In that case, you should just delete the formerly archived contract (item number 4131), and it's parent will show up in its place. I can submit a patch that will make archived contracts appear in the scout admin list.\n> \n> —\n> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.\n> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.\n> \n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"rileystewart"}}