{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/oetiker/znapzend/issues/234","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/oetiker/znapzend","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/oetiker/znapzend/issues/234/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/oetiker/znapzend/issues/234/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/oetiker/znapzend/issues/234/events","html_url":"https://github.com/oetiker/znapzend/issues/234","id":179059226,"number":234,"title":"znapzend recursive with exact replication","user":{"login":"gbulfon","id":4189468,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4189468?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon","html_url":"https://github.com/gbulfon","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-09-25T00:15:59Z","updated_at":"2016-09-25T17:12:33Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi, I just started using znapzend, and after configuring a recusrive plan on a large pool, I found replication was not keeping all my original zfs options: for example, original dataset compression is not kept on destination.\r\nAlso I had to use --autoCreation, or I would receive errors.\r\nI bet autoCreation is not creating the destination dataset exactly as the original.\r\n\r\nHow can I achieve an exact replica with znapzend? I used to have it exactly replicated with zfs send/recv.\r\n\r\nThanks,\r\nGabriele"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/oetiker/znapzend/issues/comments/249433567","html_url":"https://github.com/oetiker/znapzend/issues/234#issuecomment-249433567","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/oetiker/znapzend/issues/234","id":249433567,"user":{"login":"gbulfon","id":4189468,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4189468?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon","html_url":"https://github.com/gbulfon","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gbulfon/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-25T17:12:33Z","updated_at":"2016-09-25T17:12:33Z","body":"This is true when doing send/recv of single datasets.\r\nWhen using a \"zfs send -Rv ... data@snapname | zfs recv -Fd data-backup\", the pool is fully replicated, including properties, as a complete substitute of the original.\r\n\r\nI think something like this is necessary if znapzend is used to have an exact copy."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"gbulfon"}}