{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BabylonJS/Samples/issues/10","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BabylonJS/Samples","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BabylonJS/Samples/issues/10/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BabylonJS/Samples/issues/10/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BabylonJS/Samples/issues/10/events","html_url":"https://github.com/BabylonJS/Samples/issues/10","id":160709109,"number":10,"title":"Performance difference between babylon.js and babylon.max.js","user":{"login":"rahulchaphalkar","id":15642191,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/15642191?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rahulchaphalkar","html_url":"https://github.com/rahulchaphalkar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rahulchaphalkar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rahulchaphalkar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rahulchaphalkar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rahulchaphalkar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rahulchaphalkar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rahulchaphalkar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rahulchaphalkar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rahulchaphalkar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rahulchaphalkar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-06-16T16:51:52Z","updated_at":"2016-06-16T16:52:29Z","closed_at":"2016-06-16T16:52:29Z","body":"Is there supposed to be a performance gap when switching between babylon.max.js and babylon.js ? I tried switching between them in a couple of demos, but didn't observe any performance change. (Planning on using babylon.max.js as it is more readable).\r\nThanks."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"deltakosh"}}