{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nalimilan/CategoricalArrays.jl/issues/24","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nalimilan/CategoricalArrays.jl","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nalimilan/CategoricalArrays.jl/issues/24/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nalimilan/CategoricalArrays.jl/issues/24/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nalimilan/CategoricalArrays.jl/issues/24/events","html_url":"https://github.com/nalimilan/CategoricalArrays.jl/issues/24","id":180287024,"number":24,"title":"ordered() -> isordered()","user":{"login":"alyst","id":348591,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/348591?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst","html_url":"https://github.com/alyst","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2016-09-30T12:00:07Z","updated_at":"2016-10-01T21:13:16Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Would it be more idiomatic to rename `ordered()` into `isordered()`?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nalimilan/CategoricalArrays.jl/issues/comments/250937972","html_url":"https://github.com/nalimilan/CategoricalArrays.jl/issues/24#issuecomment-250937972","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nalimilan/CategoricalArrays.jl/issues/24","id":250937972,"user":{"login":"alyst","id":348591,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/348591?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst","html_url":"https://github.com/alyst","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alyst/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-01T21:13:16Z","updated_at":"2016-10-01T21:13:16Z","body":"@nalimilan I think chaining of `droplevels!()` is a useful property and matches well with the other `!` methods, and one still can use `levels(droplevels!(A))`."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"alyst"}}