{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/respec/issues/910","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/respec","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/respec/issues/910/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/respec/issues/910/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/respec/issues/910/events","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/910","id":169824462,"number":910,"title":"define where vocabulary in webidl should link","user":{"login":"johanneswilm","id":595512,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/595512?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/johanneswilm","html_url":"https://github.com/johanneswilm","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johanneswilm/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johanneswilm/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johanneswilm/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johanneswilm/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johanneswilm/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johanneswilm/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johanneswilm/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johanneswilm/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johanneswilm/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/respec/labels/bug","name":"bug","color":"fc2929"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-08-08T00:16:57Z","updated_at":"2016-08-08T03:50:31Z","closed_at":null,"body":"For the @w3c/editing inputevent spec, we would like to do:\r\n\r\n```\r\nreadonly attribute DataTransfer? dataTransfer;\r\n```\r\n\r\nBut it seems this is currently not possible, as respec will automatically link both instances of \"datatransfer\" to the same definition. For now it says:\r\n\r\n```\r\nreadonly attribute DataTransfer? transferData;\r\n```\r\n\r\nBut just changing the attribute name to make dealing with respec seems not the right way of dealing with this. This may be a documentation issue."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/respec/issues/comments/238136374","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/910#issuecomment-238136374","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/respec/issues/910","id":238136374,"user":{"login":"marcoscaceres","id":870154,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/870154?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres","html_url":"https://github.com/marcoscaceres","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcoscaceres/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-08T03:50:31Z","updated_at":"2016-08-08T03:50:31Z","body":"Ok, we should start by converting the spec to contiguous WebIDL... old\nschool web IDL is deprecated.\n\nOn August 8, 2016 at 1:49:15 PM, Johannes Wilm (notifications@github.com) wrote:\n> ah, you found it. will remove comments.\n>\n> ---\n> You are receiving this because you commented.\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:\n> https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/910#issuecomment-238136250\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"marcoscaceres"}}