{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py/issues/571","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py/issues/571/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py/issues/571/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py/issues/571/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py/issues/571","id":133357820,"number":571,"title":"Multiple explicit valence \"errors\" without an visible effect on output","user":{"login":"ejtierne","id":17208510,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/17208510?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejtierne","html_url":"https://github.com/ejtierne","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejtierne/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejtierne/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejtierne/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejtierne/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejtierne/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejtierne/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejtierne/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejtierne/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ejtierne/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-02-12T22:21:59Z","updated_at":"2016-02-12T22:21:59Z","closed_at":null,"body":"17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 2 O, 3, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 2 O, 3, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 0 O, 3, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 7 N, 4, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 9 N, 4, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 0 O, 3, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 7 N, 4, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 9 N, 4, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 1 O, 3, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 1 O, 3, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 8 N, 4, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:39] Explicit valence for atom # 0 N, 4, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:40] Explicit valence for atom # 8 N, 4, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:40] Explicit valence for atom # 0 N, 4, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:40] Explicit valence for atom # 1 O, 3, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:40] Explicit valence for atom # 0 O, 3, is greater than permitted\r\n[17:09:40] Explicit valence for atom # 11 N, 4, is greater than permitted\r\n\r\nAfter editing a similar example input.py file with my own molecule and running said input file, I noticed that many of these above \"errors\" were popping up during the generation but without any explicit effect on the output of the final mechanism. It is possible these \"errors\" are just a remnant of the example input.py file that I edited originally but it makes me wonder if something is running in the background that is unnecessary for my specific mechanism generation or if these errors are actually having an effect on the output in any real way."}}