{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apache/spark/issues/15328","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apache/spark","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apache/spark/issues/15328/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apache/spark/issues/15328/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apache/spark/issues/15328/events","html_url":"https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15328","id":180561656,"number":15328,"title":"[SPARKR][SPARK-17762] invokeJava fails when serialized argument list is larger than INT_MAX bytes","user":{"login":"falaki","id":512364,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/512364?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/falaki","html_url":"https://github.com/falaki","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/falaki/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/falaki/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/falaki/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/falaki/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/falaki/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/falaki/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/falaki/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/falaki/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/falaki/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":10,"created_at":"2016-10-03T04:33:36Z","updated_at":"2016-10-04T16:30:40Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apache/spark/pulls/15328","html_url":"https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15328","diff_url":"https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15328.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15328.patch"},"body":"## What changes were proposed in this pull request?\r\n* Updates implementation of `writeRaw` to call `writeBin` on smaller chunks of data when we are dealing with a large batch\r\n\r\n## How was this patch tested?\r\n* New unit tests in `test_serialize.R`\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apache/spark/issues/comments/251440353","html_url":"https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15328#issuecomment-251440353","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apache/spark/issues/15328","id":251440353,"user":{"login":"shivaram","id":143893,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/143893?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/shivaram","html_url":"https://github.com/shivaram","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shivaram/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shivaram/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shivaram/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shivaram/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shivaram/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shivaram/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shivaram/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shivaram/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shivaram/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-04T16:30:40Z","updated_at":"2016-10-04T16:30:40Z","body":"I'm not sure there is an easy way to handle this on the Java side - The max array size in the JVM is fixed as INT_MAX and AFAIK there isn't any way around it. Taking a step back, is there a specific use case when this problem comes up ? I'm trying to see if we can handle at some other layer rather than SerDe"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"shivaram"}}