{"push_id":1269449259,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/phase1","head":"cbb09d74fc50cd4a45044a77e69e4cf93ac85c02","before":"4415b939b366e5c2943348147c7cf04a8c864999","commits":[{"sha":"7e862128321089572be528c21ee89e3a336d589e","author":{"name":"Lydia Duncan","email":"de4dee48938b6ca38d3dfde4f7329b7853655052@users.noreply.github.com"},"message":"Implement detection of multiple initializations of same field in Phase 1\n\nWe decided that we prefered having a separate error message for the case where\na field is initialized multiple times in Phase 1, rather than reusing the \"out\nof order\" error message.\n\nImplement this by having an array of booleans indicating which fields have been\nseen and if the field examined is one defined in a previous iteration,\ngenerating a different error message.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lydia-duncan/chapel/commits/7e862128321089572be528c21ee89e3a336d589e"},{"sha":"cbb09d74fc50cd4a45044a77e69e4cf93ac85c02","author":{"name":"Lydia Duncan","email":"de4dee48938b6ca38d3dfde4f7329b7853655052@users.noreply.github.com"},"message":"Return the expected errors for these tests to their previous state (mostly)\n\nSince we do want to point out when multiple initializations of a field occur\n(separate from when these multiple initializations are also out of order),\nrestore the error message (except the note on previous initializations, because\nI'm lazy and don't want to store that).","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lydia-duncan/chapel/commits/cbb09d74fc50cd4a45044a77e69e4cf93ac85c02"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"lydia-duncan"}}