{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forcedotcom/ApexUnit/issues/32","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forcedotcom/ApexUnit","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forcedotcom/ApexUnit/issues/32/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forcedotcom/ApexUnit/issues/32/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forcedotcom/ApexUnit/issues/32/events","html_url":"https://github.com/forcedotcom/ApexUnit/issues/32","id":138041661,"number":32,"title":"Detailed Test Report - Missing?","user":{"login":"TedHusted","id":1641984,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1641984?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/TedHusted","html_url":"https://github.com/TedHusted","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TedHusted/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TedHusted/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TedHusted/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TedHusted/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TedHusted/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TedHusted/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TedHusted/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TedHusted/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/TedHusted/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-03-03T00:59:35Z","updated_at":"2016-03-03T19:05:43Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I've made my first successful run of ApexUnit, and I'm eager to make it part of our continuous delivery and continuous support processes. Thank you so much. \r\n\r\nThe GitHub page says \r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nOn successful completion - the command should give you build success and it should generate two report files - ApexUnitReport.xml (This is the test report in JUnit format) and Report/ApexUnitReport.html (This is the code coverage report in html format)\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nAnd I see both of those files (attached). The ApexUnitReport.html includes this link: \r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\n<a style=\"font-size:125%\"; href=/opt/ApexUnit/ApexUnitReport.xml>Detailed Test Report</a>\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nIs this link working as designed? \r\n\r\nMy expectation would be that link would lead to a ApexUnitReportDetail.html or some such. \r\n\r\nA hard-coded link to the original XML file doesn't seem correct. \r\n\r\nAlthough the files are generated, I am seeing a stack trace. \r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\n[com.sforce.cd.apexUnit.ApexUnitRunner.main()] INFO com.sforce.cd.apexUnit.ApexUnitUtils - Shutting down ApexUnit\r\njava.lang.Exception: Stack trace\r\n\tat java.lang.Thread.dumpStack(Thread.java:1365)\r\n\tat com.sforce.cd.apexUnit.ApexUnitUtils.shutDownWithErrMsg(ApexUnitUtils.java:68)\r\n\tat com.sforce.cd.apexUnit.ApexUnitRunner.main(ApexUnitRunner.java:158)\r\n\tat sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)\r\n\tat sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)\r\n\tat sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)\r\n\tat java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)\r\n\tat org.codehaus.mojo.exec.ExecJavaMojo$1.run(ExecJavaMojo.java:297)\r\n\tat java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)\r\n\r\nEarlier, there is also a cookie warning \r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nWARNING: Cookie rejected: \"$Version=0; BrowserId=MkyULpRrSUO0IoBBw13Ejw; $Path=/; $Domain=.salesforce.com\". Domain attribute \".salesforce.com\" violates RFC 2109: host minus domain may not contain any dots\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nThe org uses a my domain, which I specify in the login url. \r\n\r\n> org.login.url  https://nc-source.my.salesforce.com\r\n\r\nI'm using a fresh checkout of ApexUnit and Maven 3.3.9 on Java 1.7.0_95\r\n\r\nIs there suppose to be a detail page available?\r\n\r\nIs the error preventing the page from being completed? \r\n\r\n[ApexUnitReport.xml.txt](https://github.com/forcedotcom/ApexUnit/files/155980/ApexUnitReport.xml.txt)\r\n\r\n[ApexUnitReport.html.txt](https://github.com/forcedotcom/ApexUnit/files/155979/ApexUnitReport.html.txt)\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forcedotcom/ApexUnit/issues/comments/191917224","html_url":"https://github.com/forcedotcom/ApexUnit/issues/32#issuecomment-191917224","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/forcedotcom/ApexUnit/issues/32","id":191917224,"user":{"login":"pmedapuram","id":16479153,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16479153?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmedapuram","html_url":"https://github.com/pmedapuram","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmedapuram/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmedapuram/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmedapuram/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmedapuram/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmedapuram/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmedapuram/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmedapuram/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmedapuram/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pmedapuram/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-03T19:05:43Z","updated_at":"2016-03-03T19:05:43Z","body":"@tfuda and @TedHusted  \r\nThis feedback is great. We are constantly working towards getting ApexUnit smarter and flexible to address the common problems. \r\n\r\nI see that being able to run Apex Test classes asynchronously without any issues, is an important aspect of this tool. We are planning on addressing such issues faced with ApexUnit. \r\n\r\nRegarding https://github.com/forcedotcom/ApexUnit/issues/22 , definitely agree with not computing code coverage for test classes. We are looking to get to this and resolve it soon. It is on our road map.\r\n\r\n@TedHusted  We are looking at your reports issue. "}}