{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/20475","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/20475/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/20475/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/20475/events","html_url":"https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/20475","id":130592377,"number":20475,"title":"A pod can't direct traffic to itself via a service","user":{"login":"bgrant0607","id":7725777,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7725777?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgrant0607","html_url":"https://github.com/bgrant0607","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgrant0607/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgrant0607/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgrant0607/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgrant0607/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgrant0607/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgrant0607/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgrant0607/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgrant0607/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgrant0607/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/labels/team/cluster","name":"team/cluster","color":"d2b48c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2016-02-02T06:47:01Z","updated_at":"2016-02-03T05:59:10Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Reported by a couple users. For example:\r\nhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/34732597/kubernetes-pod-cant-connect-through-service-to-self-only-to-other-pod-contai\r\n\r\nIf deliberate, we should document it. I don't see this mentioned in services.md, for instance."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/comments/179028188","html_url":"https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/20475#issuecomment-179028188","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/20475","id":179028188,"user":{"login":"ArtfulCoder","id":1220660,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1220660?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtfulCoder","html_url":"https://github.com/ArtfulCoder","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtfulCoder/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtfulCoder/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtfulCoder/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtfulCoder/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtfulCoder/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtfulCoder/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtfulCoder/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtfulCoder/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtfulCoder/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-03T05:59:10Z","updated_at":"2016-02-03T05:59:10Z","body":"I removed the TODO in the test and it passes.\nEssentially, 127.0.0.1:nodeport works too..\n\n( I will send out a seperate PR with the test update)\n\nOn Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Abhi S. <abshah@google.com> wrote:\n\n> The only todo that I had in the kubeproxy.go e2e tests are here:\n>\n> https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e/kubeproxy.go#L188\n>\n> Basically, trying to hit 127.0.0.1:nodeport from the node itself fails.\n> I don't know if we addressed this yet.\n>\n> From the stackoverflow service config, it does not seem that the user was\n> using node ports at all.\n>\n>\n>\n> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:13 AM, TonyAdo <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n>\n>> There is a closed issue related with that #13375\n>> <https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/13375>, it should work.\n>> Also @thockin <https://github.com/thockin> I am still thinking about how\n>> to handle hairpin mode more properly within kubelet.\n>>\n>> —\n>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n>> <https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/20475#issuecomment-178626073>\n>> .\n>>\n>\n>\n"}}