{"push_id":1048188659,"size":1,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/patch-1","head":"fe8bd3dd9b976d960360cdbf3dfed3a535d7688b","before":"0f3423059ba0f5e8e278b06ac4cfc8bb8d2146d6","commits":[{"sha":"fe8bd3dd9b976d960360cdbf3dfed3a535d7688b","author":{"email":"02ba105f931c47192690c97c7cbccc0131ba3f80@users.noreply.github.com","name":"rdb"},"message":"Add get() method to Properties\n\nThe properties object as passed into a renderer function behaves a lot like a dictionary, so my first instinct has always been to call the get() method, which is ubiquitous on dict-like object in Python.  However, Properties does not provide this, instead providing the same functionality through \"getProperty\".\n\nAdding a get() alias (similar to how there is already a has_key alias) will make it behave more like what people will expect of a dict-like object.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rdb/buildbot/commits/fe8bd3dd9b976d960360cdbf3dfed3a535d7688b"}]}