{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25/events","html_url":"https://github.com/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25","id":163270195,"number":25,"title":"implementation_status needs to allow for multiple values","user":{"login":"jbarnicle","id":737400,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/737400?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle","html_url":"https://github.com/jbarnicle","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-06-30T21:23:04Z","updated_at":"2016-07-06T17:11:11Z","closed_at":null,"body":"For some implementations, implementation_status can contain multiple values.  Example: FedRamp controls could be both partially implemented and planned.  "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/comments/230840129","html_url":"https://github.com/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25#issuecomment-230840129","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25","id":230840129,"user":{"login":"afeld","id":86842,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/86842?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/afeld","html_url":"https://github.com/afeld","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afeld/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afeld/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afeld/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afeld/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afeld/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afeld/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afeld/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afeld/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/afeld/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-06T17:11:11Z","updated_at":"2016-07-06T17:11:11Z","body":"@clovett3 or anyone else: Do you have a sense of whether having multiple implementation statuses for a particular control is FedRAMP-specific, or whether it's typical for controls in various system security plans?\r\n\r\n@jbarnicle: I'd go with adding an `implementation_statuses` array field, as an alternate to `implementation_status`. Not sure if we should deprecate `implementation_status`, or support both. At the very least, using a new name will mean it isn't a breaking change to the schema."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"afeld"}}