{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tailhook/rotor-stream/issues/4","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tailhook/rotor-stream","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tailhook/rotor-stream/issues/4/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tailhook/rotor-stream/issues/4/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tailhook/rotor-stream/issues/4/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tailhook/rotor-stream/issues/4","id":156510947,"number":4,"title":"Pipelining & Notify/Awake with a message","user":{"login":"arthurprs","id":715958,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/715958?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/arthurprs","html_url":"https://github.com/arthurprs","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arthurprs/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arthurprs/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arthurprs/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arthurprs/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arthurprs/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arthurprs/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arthurprs/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arthurprs/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arthurprs/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":14,"created_at":"2016-05-24T13:43:28Z","updated_at":"2016-06-14T20:17:08Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Is is possible to implement some sort of pipeline in protocols built on top of rotor-stream? My understanding is that it isn't, since there's no intent for both receiving/sending. Is that correct?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tailhook/rotor-stream/issues/comments/226002788","html_url":"https://github.com/tailhook/rotor-stream/issues/4#issuecomment-226002788","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tailhook/rotor-stream/issues/4","id":226002788,"user":{"login":"tailhook","id":321799,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/321799?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tailhook","html_url":"https://github.com/tailhook","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tailhook/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tailhook/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tailhook/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tailhook/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tailhook/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tailhook/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tailhook/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tailhook/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tailhook/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-06-14T20:17:08Z","updated_at":"2016-06-14T20:17:08Z","body":">  But isn't MIO changing to allow using custom queues?\r\n\r\nI'm not sure if I fully understand recent changes in mio. It's likely yes. And if it's true, why don't we allow each library to register it's own queue instead of making one global?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"tailhook"}}