{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gorhill/uBlock/issues/1930","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gorhill/uBlock","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gorhill/uBlock/issues/1930/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gorhill/uBlock/issues/1930/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gorhill/uBlock/issues/1930/events","html_url":"https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/1930","id":172752902,"number":1930,"title":"Placeholder issue for discussion of issues in ABP's issue tracker -- and possible solutions","user":{"login":"gorhill","id":585534,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/585534?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gorhill","html_url":"https://github.com/gorhill","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gorhill/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gorhill/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gorhill/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gorhill/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gorhill/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gorhill/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gorhill/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gorhill/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gorhill/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":18,"created_at":"2016-08-23T17:00:34Z","updated_at":"2016-08-24T10:16:21Z","closed_at":null,"body":"[Intentionally empty]"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gorhill/uBlock/issues/comments/242017920","html_url":"https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/1930#issuecomment-242017920","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gorhill/uBlock/issues/1930","id":242017920,"user":{"login":"ameshkov","id":5947035,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5947035?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ameshkov","html_url":"https://github.com/ameshkov","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ameshkov/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ameshkov/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ameshkov/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ameshkov/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ameshkov/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ameshkov/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ameshkov/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ameshkov/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ameshkov/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-24T10:16:21Z","updated_at":"2016-08-24T10:16:21Z","body":"> Well I think the idea is that when browsers eventually support :has selectors those filters will be again using standard CSS selectors anyway.\r\n\r\nTrue. However, here is one more argument for that type of syntax. We all support **a lot** of different browsers (including mobile and such) and trying to use `pseudo-classes` syntax requires us to do it simultaneously for all the platforms. While backward-compatible syntax allows us to roll this feature out gradually.\r\n\r\n> As for the general point of using backward compatible syntax like you've suggested, I think it's a good idea. (We already do something like that for CSS property filters using the -abp-properties attribute.)\r\n\r\nYeah, I know, that's why I was surprised by the implementation proposed in the issue 3143."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ameshkov"}}