{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acrmp/foodcritic/issues/174","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acrmp/foodcritic","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acrmp/foodcritic/issues/174/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acrmp/foodcritic/issues/174/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/acrmp/foodcritic/issues/174/events","html_url":"https://github.com/acrmp/foodcritic/issues/174","id":20065032,"number":174,"title":"Rule Proposal: Explicitly list recipe in cookbook","user":{"login":"sethvargo","id":408570,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/408570?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sethvargo","html_url":"https://github.com/sethvargo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sethvargo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sethvargo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sethvargo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sethvargo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sethvargo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sethvargo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sethvargo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sethvargo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sethvargo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2013-09-25T19:41:59Z","updated_at":"2016-09-15T08:45:15Z","closed_at":"2016-09-15T08:45:15Z","body":"It has been my experience that:\r\n\r\n```ruby\r\ninclude_recipe 'cookbook::default'\r\n```\r\n\r\nis superior to:\r\n\r\n```ruby\r\ninclude_recipe 'cookbook'\r\n```\r\n\r\nfor the following reasons:\r\n\r\n- grepabaility\r\n- reduces new-user confusion\r\n- more explicit"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"sethvargo"}}