{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/issues/414","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/issues/414/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/issues/414/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/issues/414/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/issues/414","id":156347320,"number":414,"title":"[Question] RandomDNS - DNSCrypt with improvements?","user":{"login":"CHEF-KOCH","id":727123,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/727123?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/CHEF-KOCH","html_url":"https://github.com/CHEF-KOCH","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CHEF-KOCH/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CHEF-KOCH/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CHEF-KOCH/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CHEF-KOCH/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CHEF-KOCH/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CHEF-KOCH/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CHEF-KOCH/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CHEF-KOCH/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CHEF-KOCH/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2016-05-23T19:24:49Z","updated_at":"2016-05-24T23:54:52Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hey, I just found an interesting project and I'm asking myself why they not contacted you or submit an pull-request to improve the original dnscrypt tool, I'm talking about [RandomDNS](https://github.com/pwnsdx/RandomDNS). I not tested it (yet) but why not stay in contact to work together? \r\n\r\nI'm also a bit worried that maybe non experts picking the source up and claiming it's more secure which is maybe wrong since it's difficult to proof. \r\n\r\nI would be thankfully if someone could explain this a little bit. I'm skeptical if I read something like 'cool new features'. \r\n\r\nThe only thing I miss is something like an basic Cache to e.g. replace unbound and native DNSSEC support together maybe with an option to run maybe multiple instances or spawn separate processes (on e.g. heavy loads to get better performance). \r\n\r\n\r\n<bountysource-plugin>\r\n---\r\nWant to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/34503213-question-randomdns-dnscrypt-with-improvements?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F417785&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F417785&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).\r\n</bountysource-plugin>"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/issues/comments/221436415","html_url":"https://github.com/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/issues/414#issuecomment-221436415","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/issues/414","id":221436415,"user":{"login":"jedisct1","id":124872,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/124872?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jedisct1","html_url":"https://github.com/jedisct1","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jedisct1/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jedisct1/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jedisct1/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jedisct1/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jedisct1/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jedisct1/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jedisct1/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jedisct1/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jedisct1/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-05-24T23:54:52Z","updated_at":"2016-05-24T23:54:52Z","body":"Javascript would indeed be a problem on routers.\r\n\r\nBut no matter what the language is, I'm not convinced that sending a copy of your queries to multiple parties instead of just one increases security and privacy."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jedisct1"}}