{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/332","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LiskHQ/lisk","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/332/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/332/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/332/events","html_url":"https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/332","id":193277425,"number":332,"title":"Improve broadhash consensus establishment","user":{"login":"Isabello","id":16565680,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16565680?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello","html_url":"https://github.com/Isabello","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":320049958,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LiskHQ/lisk/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb","default":true}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LiskHQ/lisk/milestones/4","html_url":"https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk/milestone/4","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LiskHQ/lisk/milestones/4/labels","id":2190682,"number":4,"title":"Version 0.6.0","description":"","creator":{"login":"karmacoma","id":8068,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8068?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/karmacoma","html_url":"https://github.com/karmacoma","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karmacoma/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karmacoma/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karmacoma/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karmacoma/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karmacoma/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karmacoma/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karmacoma/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karmacoma/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karmacoma/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":5,"closed_issues":1,"state":"open","created_at":"2016-12-12T12:27:15Z","updated_at":"2016-12-19T16:47:43Z","due_on":null,"closed_at":null},"comments":4,"created_at":"2016-12-03T09:37:48Z","updated_at":"2016-12-20T16:12:10Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Currently broadhash only queries 100 peers per the hardcoded constant. This mechanism needs to be modified in the following way:\r\n\r\n1. All peers should be queried \r\n2. Peers that have a height which is behind by a large number (10+) should be ignored in establishing consensus\r\n3. Peers that are offline should be excluded\r\n\r\nQuerying more peers will create some overhead but this should be acceptable since the result will present a better outlook of the network"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/comments/268284243","html_url":"https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/332#issuecomment-268284243","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/332","id":268284243,"user":{"login":"Isabello","id":16565680,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16565680?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello","html_url":"https://github.com/Isabello","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Isabello/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-12-20T16:12:10Z","updated_at":"2016-12-20T16:12:10Z","body":"Its not really consensus if we only look at a slice. We can see how using a slice causes issues on the existing network and using more data to validate would help prevent potential network schisms"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"Isabello"}}