{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/EdinburghGenomics/EGCG-Core/issues/25","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/EdinburghGenomics/EGCG-Core","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/EdinburghGenomics/EGCG-Core/issues/25/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/EdinburghGenomics/EGCG-Core/issues/25/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/EdinburghGenomics/EGCG-Core/issues/25/events","html_url":"https://github.com/EdinburghGenomics/EGCG-Core/issues/25","id":182468210,"number":25,"title":"Review of executors","user":{"login":"tcezard","id":650891,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/650891?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tcezard","html_url":"https://github.com/tcezard","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tcezard/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tcezard/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tcezard/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tcezard/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tcezard/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tcezard/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tcezard/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tcezard/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tcezard/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-10-12T08:44:57Z","updated_at":"2016-10-19T15:27:28Z","closed_at":"2016-10-19T15:27:28Z","body":"A change in the SLURM accounting storage has changed the behaviour of sacct which means that all the task +1 (for the batch) are now being reported.\r\nThis report broke the SlurmExecutor monitoring and I patched it by changing parser in 8a294d6d6dc8a1cba6f8f091a013ded2ed9107bd and 6ebd2ac7104dbd02e15ec17ecc5c2a396e399c65.\r\ntag v0.4.4 should work, however the fix will not cover all the use cases and I also noticed that the squeue parser is not working as expected.\r\nHence I think it need to be reviewed"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"tcezard"}}