{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/istio/mixer/issues/22","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/istio/mixer","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/istio/mixer/issues/22/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/istio/mixer/issues/22/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/istio/mixer/issues/22/events","html_url":"https://github.com/istio/mixer/issues/22","id":193177739,"number":22,"title":"Review API spec","user":{"login":"louiscryan","id":9046588,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9046588?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/louiscryan","html_url":"https://github.com/louiscryan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/louiscryan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/louiscryan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/louiscryan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/louiscryan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/louiscryan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/louiscryan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/louiscryan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/louiscryan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/louiscryan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-12-02T17:52:49Z","updated_at":"2016-12-02T21:26:46Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@smawson @geeknoid \r\n\r\nTracking issue for discussion of the API specification in \r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/istio/mixer/tree/master/api/v1"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/istio/mixer/issues/comments/264566859","html_url":"https://github.com/istio/mixer/issues/22#issuecomment-264566859","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/istio/mixer/issues/22","id":264566859,"user":{"login":"douglas-reid","id":21148125,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/21148125?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/douglas-reid","html_url":"https://github.com/douglas-reid","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/douglas-reid/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/douglas-reid/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/douglas-reid/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/douglas-reid/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/douglas-reid/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/douglas-reid/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/douglas-reid/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/douglas-reid/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/douglas-reid/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-12-02T21:26:46Z","updated_at":"2016-12-02T21:26:46Z","body":"RE: LogEntry schema and facts\r\n\r\nIf we continue to allow multiple LogEntries per report, I'm not convinced that we can avoid having some level of schema. For instance, timestamps (and/or severity) of individual entries may differ. That logging metadata is arguably not part of the log entries themselves. We could probably require that all LogEntries in a single request be part of the same log_collection, however."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"douglas-reid"}}