{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hulop/NavCogIOS/issues/41","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hulop/NavCogIOS","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hulop/NavCogIOS/issues/41/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hulop/NavCogIOS/issues/41/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hulop/NavCogIOS/issues/41/events","html_url":"https://github.com/hulop/NavCogIOS/issues/41","id":172154765,"number":41,"title":"Divide destinations from nodes.","user":{"login":"loopRW","id":9497038,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9497038?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW","html_url":"https://github.com/loopRW","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hulop/NavCogIOS/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-08-19T15:15:34Z","updated_at":"2016-08-20T15:17:39Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Destinations as nodes are problematic when too many destinations are on a same logical edge. Should we start changing to POI based destinations?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hulop/NavCogIOS/issues/comments/241205749","html_url":"https://github.com/hulop/NavCogIOS/issues/41#issuecomment-241205749","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hulop/NavCogIOS/issues/41","id":241205749,"user":{"login":"loopRW","id":9497038,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9497038?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW","html_url":"https://github.com/loopRW","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/loopRW/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-20T15:17:39Z","updated_at":"2016-08-20T15:17:39Z","body":"I agree that we should not keep both. Are there any concerns for backwards compatibility? The current maps can be ported by placing a destination POI on what are currently destination nodes. That way we can upgrade all the environments we have."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"loopRW"}}