{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/derive4j/hkt/issues/1","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/derive4j/hkt","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/derive4j/hkt/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/derive4j/hkt/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/derive4j/hkt/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/derive4j/hkt/issues/1","id":143486238,"number":1,"title":"HigherKind machinery à la highj with associated annotation processor","user":{"login":"jbgi","id":221929,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/221929?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbgi","html_url":"https://github.com/jbgi","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbgi/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbgi/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbgi/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbgi/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbgi/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbgi/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbgi/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbgi/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbgi/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":24,"created_at":"2016-03-25T12:08:12Z","updated_at":"2016-03-31T21:06:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This means the ``` _``` classes at the root of https://github.com/DanielGronau/highj/tree/master/src\r\nShould be renamed to ```__``` or other name (```hk```?) to avoid javac warning.\r\n\r\nThe annotation processor should check what @gneuvill described in https://github.com/functionaljava/functionaljava/issues/126#issuecomment-201042557 to ensure acceptable type-safety.\r\n\r\nAdditionally it would also check that a narrow/coherce method exists with the right type signature.\r\n\r\n@gneuvill Would you be up to the task?\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/derive4j/hkt/issues/comments/204129746","html_url":"https://github.com/derive4j/hkt/issues/1#issuecomment-204129746","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/derive4j/hkt/issues/1","id":204129746,"user":{"login":"gneuvill","id":369908,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/369908?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gneuvill","html_url":"https://github.com/gneuvill","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gneuvill/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gneuvill/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gneuvill/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gneuvill/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gneuvill/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gneuvill/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gneuvill/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gneuvill/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gneuvill/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-31T21:06:13Z","updated_at":"2016-03-31T21:06:13Z","body":"> As for ecj, support should done in the same processor are it would lead to complicated setup for end-users. I think all compiler specific code should co into a static inner class. By reflection or other mean we test what is the current processor before using the corresponding code of a static inner class (or separated class) of the processor.\r\n\r\nYep. Because of import statements, I guess we'll be forced to use separate classes. Do you happen to have any pointer to ecj api documentation ? (I've never been able to find my way through the gazillions of eclipse sub-sites, wiki, whatever which are as well organised as their IDE)"}}