{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libgit2/libgit2/issues/3802","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libgit2/libgit2","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libgit2/libgit2/issues/3802/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libgit2/libgit2/issues/3802/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libgit2/libgit2/issues/3802/events","html_url":"https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues/3802","id":157036989,"number":3802,"title":"bisecting for gitlab-ce #14972","user":{"login":"glensc","id":199095,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/199095?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/glensc","html_url":"https://github.com/glensc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glensc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glensc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glensc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glensc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glensc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glensc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glensc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glensc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glensc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":11,"created_at":"2016-05-26T17:29:26Z","updated_at":"2016-06-01T16:31:47Z","closed_at":"2016-06-01T16:31:47Z","body":"as @ethomson pointed out in https://github.com/libgit2/rugged/issues/607#issuecomment-221923851 i should be bisecting the commit that fixes [gitlab-ce #14972](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/14972)\r\n\r\nhere will be my results bisecting\r\nhttps://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/compare/v0.24.0...c75644\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libgit2/libgit2/issues/comments/223049633","html_url":"https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues/3802#issuecomment-223049633","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libgit2/libgit2/issues/3802","id":223049633,"user":{"login":"ethomson","id":1130014,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1130014?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ethomson","html_url":"https://github.com/ethomson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ethomson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ethomson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ethomson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ethomson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ethomson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ethomson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ethomson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ethomson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ethomson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":true},"created_at":"2016-06-01T16:31:47Z","updated_at":"2016-06-01T16:31:47Z","body":"I think that the current status is:\r\n\r\n1. Your bug will be fixed by libgit2 0.25.  We're nearing a release, but we're not done yet.\r\n2. Since your issue was fixed by very severe changes (basically a rewrite of the iterators), it's not something that we'd be able to backport to 0.24.  We like those to be quite stable and - although we'd like to fix an iterator bug, I wouldn't feel comfortable doing it by pulling in such a massive change, especially not knowing what the bug actually was.\r\n3. There's already a rugged release out with this change.  Since gitlab depends on rugged, _not_ libgit2 directly, this seems like an appropriate release for them to target.\r\n4. If they really want a libgit2 0.24.x that includes this change, they're welcome to backport this themselves.\r\n\r\nI don't think there's a lot actionable to do in libgit2 at the moment.  Thanks for reporting this - if you're able to provide a repo that illustrates this behavior, that would be great.\r\n\r\nFor example, does `git fast-export --anonymize` produce something that is suitably anonymous?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ethomson"}}