{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethcore/jsonrpc/issues/12","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethcore/jsonrpc","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethcore/jsonrpc/issues/12/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethcore/jsonrpc/issues/12/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethcore/jsonrpc/issues/12/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ethcore/jsonrpc/issues/12","id":194756227,"number":12,"title":"idea, unify sync/async code, use futures instead ","user":{"login":"debris","id":2613714,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2613714?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris","html_url":"https://github.com/debris","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-12-10T09:38:57Z","updated_at":"2016-12-10T15:13:49Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@tomusdrw @rphmeier what do you think about that?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethcore/jsonrpc/issues/comments/266215112","html_url":"https://github.com/ethcore/jsonrpc/issues/12#issuecomment-266215112","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethcore/jsonrpc/issues/12","id":266215112,"user":{"login":"debris","id":2613714,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2613714?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris","html_url":"https://github.com/debris","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/debris/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-12-10T15:13:49Z","updated_at":"2016-12-10T15:13:49Z","body":"> Using futures in core will also make a strict requirements about transports (as far as I understand you need an event loop at some point to use futures)\r\n\r\nActually not. Futures might be easily used from tokio event loop, although using it is completely optional.\r\n\r\n> It would be nice to have this as futures-based but given that we have 3 mediums of transport to support this might be a really significant undertaking.\r\n\r\nWe could take `tokio` for `tcp` and `http` (there is poc library called `minihttp-tokio`) or wait for tokio-based hyper release (afaik, it's on the roadmap). So the only transport that would have to be reimplemented is `ipc`"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"debris"}}