{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABHR/octohatrack/issues/79","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABHR/octohatrack","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABHR/octohatrack/issues/79/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABHR/octohatrack/issues/79/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABHR/octohatrack/issues/79/events","html_url":"https://github.com/LABHR/octohatrack/issues/79","id":151749692,"number":79,"title":"Labelling of sections of contributors","user":{"login":"glasnt","id":813732,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/813732?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt","html_url":"https://github.com/glasnt","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-04-28T21:39:09Z","updated_at":"2016-04-28T22:46:16Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I've been mulling over this after conversations I've had with @ossanna16; I don't think I'm using the correct naming conventions for the sections of the report. \r\n\r\nI think it should be renamed, but I'm unsure on the new names. \r\n\r\nI have two thoughts for this at the moment: \r\n\r\n\r\n### Option One: Keep the separation, but rename the sections\r\n```\r\nRepo: (repo_name)\r\nGitHub contributors:\r\n[list a]\r\n\r\nAll Contributors:\r\n[list b]\r\n\r\nGitHub Contributors: len(list a)\r\nAll Contributors: len(list b)\r\n```\r\n\r\nWhere [list a] is the list defined by GitHub, and [list b] is everything else\r\n\r\n\r\n### Option Two: make the CLI match the web interface\r\n\r\n```\r\nRepo: (repo_name)\r\nContributors: \r\n[list]\r\n\r\nContributors (as per GitHub): len(list a)\r\nAll Contributors: len(list)\r\n\r\n```\r\nIn this form, `len(list a)` would be the original list as per the GitHub contributor API endpoint, but the entire list would be an alphabetic list of all contributors (maybe with the 👏 emoji at the end for what was previously defined as 'non-coding' contributors)\r\n\r\n@ossanna16: if you have the time, I'd appreciate your input on this.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABHR/octohatrack/issues/comments/215585121","html_url":"https://github.com/LABHR/octohatrack/issues/79#issuecomment-215585121","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/LABHR/octohatrack/issues/79","id":215585121,"user":{"login":"glasnt","id":813732,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/813732?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt","html_url":"https://github.com/glasnt","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/glasnt/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-04-28T22:46:16Z","updated_at":"2016-04-28T22:46:16Z","body":"@ossanna16 thank you! I'll wrangle up a proof-of-concept on Option One then :)\r\n\r\n(I favour option one because it exposes what the GitHub 'contributors' list should say, but caps out at 100 on the click-through)"}}