{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-web-stomp/issues/58","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-web-stomp","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-web-stomp/issues/58/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-web-stomp/issues/58/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-web-stomp/issues/58/events","html_url":"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-web-stomp/issues/58","id":147766631,"number":58,"title":"Lack of publisher throttling","user":{"login":"JSteunou","id":2323127,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2323127?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/JSteunou","html_url":"https://github.com/JSteunou","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JSteunou/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JSteunou/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JSteunou/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JSteunou/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JSteunou/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JSteunou/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JSteunou/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JSteunou/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JSteunou/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-04-12T14:19:50Z","updated_at":"2016-04-12T14:37:57Z","closed_at":"2016-04-12T14:37:57Z","body":"or certainly me using rabbitmq wrong, but when sending messages (150ko) at a rate slightly over 100/s and 2 clients receiving at the same rate, rabbitmq binaries memory is raising up the sky. In 1 min I can read 4**Gb** in the *processes* binaries section.\r\n\r\nWhen sending at 50/s it's ok, staying low < 2**MB**\r\n\r\nI did not find the critical point rate yet, but I found this very strange.\r\n\r\n(rmq 3.5.7)"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-web-stomp/issues/comments/208938255","html_url":"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-web-stomp/issues/58#issuecomment-208938255","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-web-stomp/issues/58","id":208938255,"user":{"login":"michaelklishin","id":1090,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1090?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin","html_url":"https://github.com/michaelklishin","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-04-12T14:37:57Z","updated_at":"2016-04-12T14:37:57Z","body":"Actually, this is almost certainly a duplicate of https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-web-stomp/issues/40, which talks about [resource-driven flow control](http://rabbitmq.com/alarms.html) for Web STOMP connections."}}