{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CharlesShang/TFFRCNN/issues/3","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CharlesShang/TFFRCNN","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CharlesShang/TFFRCNN/issues/3/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CharlesShang/TFFRCNN/issues/3/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CharlesShang/TFFRCNN/issues/3/events","html_url":"https://github.com/CharlesShang/TFFRCNN/issues/3","id":189671489,"number":3,"title":"the mAP compared to py-faster-rcnn","user":{"login":"xinghedyc","id":9301248,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9301248?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/xinghedyc","html_url":"https://github.com/xinghedyc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xinghedyc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xinghedyc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xinghedyc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xinghedyc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xinghedyc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xinghedyc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xinghedyc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xinghedyc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xinghedyc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":12,"created_at":"2016-11-16T11:15:29Z","updated_at":"2016-11-21T02:58:01Z","closed_at":"2016-11-21T02:58:01Z","body":"sorry to bother you again.\r\nI find it your checkpoint given is about 65% mAP on pascal 2007 test set.\r\ndoes it need more iters to train?\r\nI also train for about 70k iters but can only reach 50% mAP."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CharlesShang/TFFRCNN/issues/comments/261831093","html_url":"https://github.com/CharlesShang/TFFRCNN/issues/3#issuecomment-261831093","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CharlesShang/TFFRCNN/issues/3","id":261831093,"user":{"login":"CharlesShang","id":2253266,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2253266?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/CharlesShang","html_url":"https://github.com/CharlesShang","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CharlesShang/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CharlesShang/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CharlesShang/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CharlesShang/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CharlesShang/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CharlesShang/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CharlesShang/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CharlesShang/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/CharlesShang/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-11-21T02:58:01Z","updated_at":"2016-11-21T02:58:01Z","body":"So far, the best mAP I got after 80k iters is 0.685 (0.699 in the original paper). \r\n\r\nThere're still improvement, like tuning loss_weight, adding regularization (there is no regularization in the current version).  \r\nNow I'm closing this issue. \r\nI'll solve it in a few days."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"CharlesShang"}}