{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/xjava/issues/90","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/xjava","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/xjava/issues/90/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/xjava/issues/90/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/xjava/issues/90/events","html_url":"https://github.com/exercism/xjava/issues/90","id":128343636,"number":90,"title":"Etl: Do we really need an instance of the class Etl?","user":{"login":"NobbZ","id":58951,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/58951?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/NobbZ","html_url":"https://github.com/NobbZ","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NobbZ/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NobbZ/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NobbZ/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NobbZ/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NobbZ/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NobbZ/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NobbZ/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NobbZ/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NobbZ/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-01-23T18:09:14Z","updated_at":"2016-02-06T05:11:59Z","closed_at":"2016-02-06T05:11:59Z","body":"In the exercise etl, the current testsuite does enforce a non-static class by creating an instance of `Etl`.\r\n\r\nWhen I did the exercise about half a year ago, this was not the case.\r\n\r\nSince there is no data passed to the constructor and you can leave everything it is and you don't need to implement a constructor yourself, but let it fall through to `Object`s constructor, there is really no need to enforce instantiability.\r\n\r\nSo why was this change done? Why don't the current tests use a static `Etl`?"}}