{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMobileAlliance/OMA-LwM2M-Public-Review/issues/96","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMobileAlliance/OMA-LwM2M-Public-Review","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMobileAlliance/OMA-LwM2M-Public-Review/issues/96/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMobileAlliance/OMA-LwM2M-Public-Review/issues/96/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMobileAlliance/OMA-LwM2M-Public-Review/issues/96/events","html_url":"https://github.com/OpenMobileAlliance/OMA-LwM2M-Public-Review/issues/96","id":144128422,"number":96,"title":"TS 8.2.3 Registration Interface : POST or PUT for the 'Update' CoAP Method?","user":{"login":"jaeeunchoi","id":12757966,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12757966?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeeunchoi","html_url":"https://github.com/jaeeunchoi","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeeunchoi/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeeunchoi/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeeunchoi/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeeunchoi/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeeunchoi/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeeunchoi/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeeunchoi/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeeunchoi/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaeeunchoi/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMobileAlliance/OMA-LwM2M-Public-Review/labels/bug","name":"bug","color":"fc2929"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMobileAlliance/OMA-LwM2M-Public-Review/labels/Test%20Case","name":"Test Case","color":"5319e7"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2016-03-29T01:33:05Z","updated_at":"2016-03-31T10:23:02Z","closed_at":"2016-03-31T10:23:02Z","body":"About the CoAP Method of 'Update' in the TS section 8.2.3,\r\nthe current TS doc (2015 DEC) is written as 'POST' ( \"Registration update is performed by sending a CoAP PUT... \").\r\nBut the older version of TS ( eg. 2014.NOV) is written as 'PUT'.\r\nAnd '6.1.2.2 LightweightM2M-1.0-int-102 – Registration Update' in the current test specification ( OMA-ETS-LightweightM2M-V1_0-20151208-C) also uses 'PUT'.\r\n\r\nWhich one is the correct one? PUT or POST?\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMobileAlliance/OMA-LwM2M-Public-Review/issues/comments/203868329","html_url":"https://github.com/OpenMobileAlliance/OMA-LwM2M-Public-Review/issues/96#issuecomment-203868329","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OpenMobileAlliance/OMA-LwM2M-Public-Review/issues/96","id":203868329,"user":{"login":"ThGarnier","id":10596512,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10596512?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ThGarnier","html_url":"https://github.com/ThGarnier","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ThGarnier/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ThGarnier/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ThGarnier/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ThGarnier/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ThGarnier/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ThGarnier/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ThGarnier/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ThGarnier/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ThGarnier/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-31T10:23:02Z","updated_at":"2016-03-31T10:23:02Z","body":"Hello!  the ETS is wrong. In fact the LWM2M TS 1.0 has been changed beginning of 2015 regarding the update registration which was initially mapped on a 'PUT'.\r\nSo since that date  (Fev 2015) update registration is mapped on 'POST', the ETS (int 102)  has not been updated yet regarding that point : it will be done ASAP . Great eyes, jaeeunchoi :-)  !!!  many thanks\r\n=> As Julian said there is no issue in leshan, this issue will be turned to \"To-be-closed\" as soon as the ETS will be fixed on that point "}}