{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grantcarthew/node-rethinkdb-job-queue/issues/44","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grantcarthew/node-rethinkdb-job-queue","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grantcarthew/node-rethinkdb-job-queue/issues/44/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grantcarthew/node-rethinkdb-job-queue/issues/44/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grantcarthew/node-rethinkdb-job-queue/issues/44/events","html_url":"https://github.com/grantcarthew/node-rethinkdb-job-queue/issues/44","id":196502841,"number":44,"title":"Consider accepting an existing rethinkdbdash connection","user":{"login":"chrisabrams","id":527740,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/527740?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisabrams","html_url":"https://github.com/chrisabrams","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisabrams/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisabrams/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisabrams/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisabrams/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisabrams/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisabrams/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisabrams/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisabrams/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrisabrams/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-12-19T19:41:47Z","updated_at":"2016-12-19T22:34:59Z","closed_at":"2016-12-19T22:34:59Z","body":"I'm working on a larger project which is trying to retain a single connection pool. Throughout the project I create many jobs using this wonderful library. I'd like to request the option to pass `r` to the job to utilize an existing connection pool, rather than making another.\r\n\r\nI've considered replacing `q.r` but thought there might be a  more elegant way of handling this?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"grantcarthew"}}