{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/issues/389","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SanchoGGP/ggp-base","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/issues/389/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/issues/389/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/issues/389/events","html_url":"https://github.com/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/issues/389","id":171217605,"number":389,"title":"Can we avoid propnets with loops?","user":{"login":"arr28","id":3194913,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3194913?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28","html_url":"https://github.com/arr28","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/labels/experiment","name":"experiment","color":"5319e7"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/labels/P2","name":"P2","color":"666666"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":{"login":"arr28","id":3194913,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3194913?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28","html_url":"https://github.com/arr28","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"assignees":[{"login":"arr28","id":3194913,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3194913?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28","html_url":"https://github.com/arr28","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arr28/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false}],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2016-08-15T17:23:40Z","updated_at":"2016-08-21T13:44:57Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Timed out on meta-gaming & first move according to Bertrand."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/issues/comments/241258458","html_url":"https://github.com/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/issues/389#issuecomment-241258458","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/issues/389","id":241258458,"user":{"login":"SteveDraper","id":5732842,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5732842?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteveDraper","html_url":"https://github.com/SteveDraper","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteveDraper/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteveDraper/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteveDraper/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteveDraper/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteveDraper/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteveDraper/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteveDraper/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteveDraper/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SteveDraper/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-21T13:44:57Z","updated_at":"2016-08-21T13:44:57Z","body":"At a minimum we can presumably write an analysis step that performs loop\ndetection (i.e. - results is a boolean indicating the presence of one or\nmore loops), and use that to disable the analysis steps that cannot cope\nwith them.\n\nOn Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Andrew Rose <notifications@github.com>\nwrote:\n\n> So, there are at least 3 analysis steps that can't cope with propnets with\n> loops. I wonder if there's any way of ensuring that we don't get propnets\n> with loops (or, if we do, somehow modifying it afterwards to remove to\n> loops) or whether there's some GDL that can't be converted to a loop-free\n> propnet. Repurposing this bug...\n>\n> —\n> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.\n> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub\n> <https://github.com/SanchoGGP/ggp-base/issues/389#issuecomment-241215922>,\n> or mute the thread\n> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFd56oapy8DnCWYNxy2GXzfRCJWMpuPJks5qh0eBgaJpZM4JklPM>\n> .\n>\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"SteveDraper"}}