{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/668","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/668/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/668/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/668/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/668","id":171147195,"number":668,"title":"document.all willful violation","user":{"login":"annevk","id":1544111,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1544111?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/annevk","html_url":"https://github.com/annevk","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/annevk/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/annevk/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/annevk/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/annevk/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/annevk/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/annevk/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/annevk/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/annevk/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/annevk/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/labels/web%20reality","name":"web reality","color":"bfdadc"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-08-15T10:38:41Z","updated_at":"2016-08-16T22:12:56Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Other than some event loop mismatch which I think we'll be able to resolve more easily, HTML (and JavaScript engines) also contain(s) the `document.all` willful violation.\r\n\r\nhttps://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/obsolete.html#dom-document-all\r\n\r\nHow much appetite is there to try to formalize this exception?\r\n\r\nTopic: \"web reality\""},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/comments/240256121","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/668#issuecomment-240256121","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecma262/issues/668","id":240256121,"user":{"login":"bterlson","id":11236,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11236?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson","html_url":"https://github.com/bterlson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bterlson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-16T22:12:56Z","updated_at":"2016-08-16T22:12:56Z","body":"@allenwb do you think the formalization we would add in the technical note would be beneficial beyond what is already mentioned in HTML?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"bterlson"}}