{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RexOps/Rex/issues/932","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RexOps/Rex","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RexOps/Rex/issues/932/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RexOps/Rex/issues/932/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RexOps/Rex/issues/932/events","html_url":"https://github.com/RexOps/Rex/issues/932","id":132243755,"number":932,"title":"Servers that differ only in auth info should be considered unique","user":{"login":"shattered","id":691524,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/691524?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/shattered","html_url":"https://github.com/shattered","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shattered/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shattered/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shattered/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shattered/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shattered/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shattered/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shattered/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shattered/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/shattered/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-02-08T20:06:28Z","updated_at":"2016-02-09T08:36:48Z","closed_at":null,"body":"At the moment, code introduced in https://github.com/RexOps/Rex/commit/4358803347799b29453bb2533522924c2ac300a5 eliminates duplicate server names from a group -- this breaks the scenario when connection needs to be made to one server under multiple user accounts."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RexOps/Rex/issues/comments/181759815","html_url":"https://github.com/RexOps/Rex/issues/932#issuecomment-181759815","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RexOps/Rex/issues/932","id":181759815,"user":{"login":"ferki","id":3117609,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3117609?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ferki","html_url":"https://github.com/ferki","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ferki/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ferki/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ferki/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ferki/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ferki/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ferki/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ferki/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ferki/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ferki/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-09T08:36:48Z","updated_at":"2016-02-09T08:36:48Z","body":"Can you give us an example, please? There might be a more efficient way to do something like this than multiplicating server entries."}}