{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39/events","html_url":"https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39","id":165717663,"number":39,"title":"Research/academic quality of submission","user":{"login":"pjotrp","id":13551,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13551?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp","html_url":"https://github.com/pjotrp","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2016-07-15T06:03:02Z","updated_at":"2016-07-16T03:34:01Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I was just looking a newly submitted paper and wondered whether it actually addresses a research question, i.e., its academic value. I think we should add a standard reviewer question that says something about that. It is a box that needs to be ticked if we want to be taken seriously as a scientific journal. We don't want JOSS to end up as a basket for software projects that have no academic value."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/comments/233105734","html_url":"https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39#issuecomment-233105734","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39","id":233105734,"user":{"login":"pjotrp","id":13551,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13551?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp","html_url":"https://github.com/pjotrp","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-16T03:34:01Z","updated_at":"2016-07-16T03:34:01Z","body":"If that is the case it should be fine. I would like the authors to respond about this in the issue tracker so it is clear to others. Also I would like to warn the authors that this publication will be visible forever and they should be convinced it will support their research track record in the future. Lack of research quality and/or code quality may be damaging to a career."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"pjotrp"}}