{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hybox/models/issues/42","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hybox/models","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hybox/models/issues/42/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hybox/models/issues/42/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hybox/models/issues/42/events","html_url":"https://github.com/hybox/models/issues/42","id":148761184,"number":42,"title":"Discussion of Postcard Model","user":{"login":"azaroth42","id":871868,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/871868?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42","html_url":"https://github.com/azaroth42","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/azaroth42/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":41,"created_at":"2016-04-15T20:28:09Z","updated_at":"2016-04-25T19:45:41Z","closed_at":null,"body":"At: https://github.com/hybox/models/blob/master/notes/usecase.md"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hybox/models/issues/comments/214496254","html_url":"https://github.com/hybox/models/issues/42#issuecomment-214496254","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hybox/models/issues/42","id":214496254,"user":{"login":"barmintor","id":119860,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/119860?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/barmintor","html_url":"https://github.com/barmintor","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/barmintor/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/barmintor/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/barmintor/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/barmintor/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/barmintor/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/barmintor/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/barmintor/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/barmintor/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/barmintor/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-04-25T19:45:40Z","updated_at":"2016-04-25T19:45:40Z","body":"I think there are use cases for aggregating FileSets in multiple aggregations, and definitely use cases for not wanting pull all the FileSets under an Object in. You're going to have digitization folks uploading a batch of stuff (Preservation Images of Postcard Archives Box 24; Infrared Scans of Postcard Archives) for whom the batch is the actual thing. You're going to need to be able to aggregate them under objects later (Bahamas Postcard) for context later. The relationship of those FileSets to the aggregating object is going to be contextual. So while I totally agree with needing multiple FileSets per object, and I totally agree with needing to have an Object that represents Parts, I think we're going down a questionable path as far as cardinality of aggregation and prescribed containment."}}