{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/276","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/276/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/276/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/276/events","html_url":"https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/276","id":161989697,"number":276,"title":"Requesting a non-ontology PURL, for SHACL validation checks","user":{"login":"cmungall","id":50745,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/50745?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cmungall","html_url":"https://github.com/cmungall","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cmungall/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cmungall/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cmungall/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cmungall/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cmungall/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cmungall/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cmungall/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cmungall/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cmungall/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-06-23T18:22:06Z","updated_at":"2016-06-24T14:01:48Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@balhoff has some SHACL validation checks that are widely applicable across multiple ontologies. The SHACL is expressed as RDF, but it not really an 'ontology' in the OBO sense. However, it would be useful to have a purl for these, so that people can point to this in their pipelines and not worry about underlying repo changing etc. We were thinking `/obo/validations/`"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/comments/228353542","html_url":"https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/276#issuecomment-228353542","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/276","id":228353542,"user":{"login":"jamesaoverton","id":292409,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/292409?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesaoverton","html_url":"https://github.com/jamesaoverton","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesaoverton/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesaoverton/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesaoverton/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesaoverton/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesaoverton/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesaoverton/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesaoverton/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesaoverton/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jamesaoverton/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-06-24T14:01:48Z","updated_at":"2016-06-24T14:01:48Z","body":"Having PURLs for tools is a good idea. Naming is hard. If this is SHACL-specific, then I'm not sure that \"validations\" is the best name, since I can imagine other projects using different tools for validation. We might want more of these tool PURLs, but I don't think they should complete with ontologies for names. Maybe `/obo/tools/*` or something?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jamesaoverton"}}