{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/72","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/72/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/72/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/72/events","html_url":"https://github.com/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/72","id":125622974,"number":72,"title":"Our relationship with LibreSignal","user":{"login":"f41c0r","id":4326714,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4326714?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/f41c0r","html_url":"https://github.com/f41c0r","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/f41c0r/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/f41c0r/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/f41c0r/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/f41c0r/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/f41c0r/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/f41c0r/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/f41c0r/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/f41c0r/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/f41c0r/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":24,"created_at":"2016-01-08T14:33:18Z","updated_at":"2016-01-17T14:52:17Z","closed_at":null,"body":"After #71 is solved, we need to come to the following decisions moving forward:\r\n\r\nA) Do we acknowledge this repo as the source for LibreSignal, or do we tell @xmikos to create his own repo, and stop sending people with issues our way? If we acknowledge this repo as the source for LibreSignal, what level of support do we provide to people posting issues?\r\n\r\nB) Do we start incorporating new feature requests that diverge with upstream, e.g. #40.\r\n\r\nWe should decide these issues one way or another, and then address the repo in that direction. If we decide that we still want to remain as close to upstream as possible, then we should close the offending issues, tell @xmikos to stop pointing at us for support, and start working on getting merged upstream, whatever that would take. If we decide the opposite, then we should merge #40, perhaps start working on LibreSignal features, and make it more transparent how LibreSignal releases are being made."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/comments/172332051","html_url":"https://github.com/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/72#issuecomment-172332051","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/72","id":172332051,"user":{"login":"mimi89999","id":8530546,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8530546?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mimi89999","html_url":"https://github.com/mimi89999","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mimi89999/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mimi89999/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mimi89999/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mimi89999/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mimi89999/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mimi89999/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mimi89999/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mimi89999/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mimi89999/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-01-17T14:52:17Z","updated_at":"2016-01-17T14:52:17Z","body":"@xmikos Would you create an organization on GitHub?"}}