{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NumberFour/n4js/issues/211","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NumberFour/n4js","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NumberFour/n4js/issues/211/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NumberFour/n4js/issues/211/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/NumberFour/n4js/issues/211/events","html_url":"https://github.com/NumberFour/n4js/issues/211","id":159592060,"number":211,"title":"Proposal: Support concise syntax for `IterableN<...>`","user":{"login":"dbo","id":172634,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/172634?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbo","html_url":"https://github.com/dbo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dbo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-06-10T09:13:49Z","updated_at":"2016-06-10T09:13:49Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Since we're supporting more concise array syntax, we should offer the same for `IterableN`, e.g.\r\n```js\r\nlet a: [int, string];\r\n/ / equivalent to:\r\nlet a: Iterable2<int, string>;\r\n```\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"dbo"}}