{"push_id":1416486615,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"44087d88325be9e7b2e532b16c615e8be4eef13e","before":"b89ddd421feed0a8dc45fb6a9a26dde34e3b7b9e","commits":[{"sha":"0e9957135d9057f91fe30af01d4a70e30ee8a6b3","author":{"name":"Yves Senn","email":"45b0750c2c8f66ea58d01da52f1a0ee0448093b8@gmail.com"},"message":"Introduce `reload_<association>` reader for singular associations.\n\nThis patch brings back the functionality of passing true to the\nassociation proxy. The behavior was deprecated with #20888 and scheduled\nfor removal in Rails 5.1.\n\nThe deprecation mentioned that instead of `Article.category(true)` one\nshould use `article#reload.category`. Unfortunately the alternative does\nnot expose the same behavior as passing true to the reader\ndid. Specifically reloading the parent record throws unsaved changes and\nother caches away. Passing true only affected the association.\n\nThis is problematic and there is no easy workaround. I propose to bring\nback the old functionality by introducing this new reader method for\nsingular associations.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rails/rails/commits/0e9957135d9057f91fe30af01d4a70e30ee8a6b3"},{"sha":"44087d88325be9e7b2e532b16c615e8be4eef13e","author":{"name":"Yves Senn","email":"45b0750c2c8f66ea58d01da52f1a0ee0448093b8@gmail.com"},"message":"Merge pull request #27133 from rails/reload_singular_associations\n\nIntroduce `reload_<association>` reader for singular associations.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rails/rails/commits/44087d88325be9e7b2e532b16c615e8be4eef13e"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"senny"}}