{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elastic/beats/issues/581","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elastic/beats","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elastic/beats/issues/581/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elastic/beats/issues/581/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elastic/beats/issues/581/events","html_url":"https://github.com/elastic/beats/issues/581","id":123446242,"number":581,"title":"RabbitMQ output","user":{"login":"Semyazz","id":440414,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/440414?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Semyazz","html_url":"https://github.com/Semyazz","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Semyazz/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Semyazz/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Semyazz/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Semyazz/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Semyazz/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Semyazz/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Semyazz/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Semyazz/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Semyazz/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elastic/beats/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"fbca04"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elastic/beats/labels/libbeat","name":"libbeat","color":"008000"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":34,"created_at":"2015-12-22T09:26:46Z","updated_at":"2016-08-05T23:19:31Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Any plans to implement RabbitMQ (RMQ) output? I got isolated environments and I want to send everything through RMQ. I use cert-based auth and so on and it'd be awesome to utilize the same BUS here. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elastic/beats/issues/comments/237987643","html_url":"https://github.com/elastic/beats/issues/581#issuecomment-237987643","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/elastic/beats/issues/581","id":237987643,"user":{"login":"ant31","id":1044332,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1044332?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ant31","html_url":"https://github.com/ant31","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ant31/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ant31/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ant31/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ant31/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ant31/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ant31/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ant31/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ant31/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ant31/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-05T23:19:31Z","updated_at":"2016-08-05T23:19:31Z","body":"I think as users, we would like to replace the logstash shipper by a filebeat for multiple reason. \r\nBut doing that we don't want to change the chain after this point. \r\n\r\nfrom: \r\n`logstash -> rmq -> logstash -> outputs`\r\nto\r\n`filebeat -> rmq -> logstash -> outputs`\r\n\r\nRabbitmq have been the recommanded broker, many configuration include it.  \r\nIt's fair to ask for its support in filebeat.. "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ant31"}}