{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andimarek/graphql-java/issues/118","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andimarek/graphql-java","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andimarek/graphql-java/issues/118/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andimarek/graphql-java/issues/118/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andimarek/graphql-java/issues/118/events","html_url":"https://github.com/andimarek/graphql-java/issues/118","id":145004167,"number":118,"title":"Recursive GraphQLTypeReference resolution","user":{"login":"yrashk","id":452,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/452?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/yrashk","html_url":"https://github.com/yrashk","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yrashk/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yrashk/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yrashk/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yrashk/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yrashk/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yrashk/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yrashk/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yrashk/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yrashk/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2016-03-31T20:07:03Z","updated_at":"2016-04-23T08:53:07Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I am wondering if type reference resolution should go deeper beyond one level.\r\n\r\nRight now, according to my best understanding of https://github.com/andimarek/graphql-java/blob/master/src/main/java/graphql/schema/SchemaUtil.java#L149-L155, for every object's field, it will do a type resolution. However, if that resolved type itself contains further type references, they won't be processed. Is this intentional or should it be improved? Happy to work on a PR if you think this should be improved."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andimarek/graphql-java/issues/comments/213695101","html_url":"https://github.com/andimarek/graphql-java/issues/118#issuecomment-213695101","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andimarek/graphql-java/issues/118","id":213695101,"user":{"login":"andimarek","id":1706744,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1706744?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/andimarek","html_url":"https://github.com/andimarek","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andimarek/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andimarek/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andimarek/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andimarek/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andimarek/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andimarek/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andimarek/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andimarek/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/andimarek/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-04-23T08:53:07Z","updated_at":"2016-04-23T08:53:07Z","body":"@yrashk I don't think we need to go \"deeper\" if we visit every type (at least that was the idea)"}}