{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/unclebob/fitnesse/issues/868","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/unclebob/fitnesse","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/unclebob/fitnesse/issues/868/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/unclebob/fitnesse/issues/868/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/unclebob/fitnesse/issues/868/events","html_url":"https://github.com/unclebob/fitnesse/issues/868","id":131601137,"number":868,"title":"Do you plan to improve Symbolic Links?","user":{"login":"sbellus","id":436473,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/436473?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sbellus","html_url":"https://github.com/sbellus","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sbellus/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sbellus/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sbellus/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sbellus/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sbellus/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sbellus/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sbellus/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sbellus/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sbellus/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-02-05T09:57:02Z","updated_at":"2016-02-05T09:57:02Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi\r\n\r\nI have more less psychological problem with usage of Symbolic Links as described in http://www.fitnesse.org/FitNesse.FullReferenceGuide.UserGuide.FitNesseWiki.SymbolicLinks.\r\n\r\nThe cause of my problem is to create two level structure of static pages (one is ignored) as described on http://www.fitnesse.org/FitNesse.SuiteAcceptanceTests.SuiteVersionsControllerTests.BusinessCase.\r\nAlso on the page is stated that the structure has to be created only for technical reason (Because of limitation of Fitnesse).\r\n\r\nIs it possible to get rid of this technical structure? The benefit would be that documentation will look more natural.\r\n\r\nBecause I don't know implementation details, please take following lines only as inspiration.\r\n\r\nFitnesse will provide new page type Bussiness Rules/Tests Template/Examples Template/Bussiness Examples/Parametrized Examples/... I don't know correct name within Fitnesse domain.\r\n\r\nThe page can be new type (as Test/Suite page) or new special page (http://www.fitnesse.org/FitNesse.FullReferenceGuide.UserGuide.WritingAcceptanceTests.SpecialPages)\r\n\r\nThe page will have no Test/Suite button (same as static page)\r\nThe tests under page will be not executed during parent suite execution (different as static page)\r\nThe tests under page will be executed when the page is linked under the suite page\r\nThe undefined variables will be accentuated (may be same layout as for tags can be used)\r\n\r\nWhat do you think about it?\r\nBest regards"}}