{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pac4j/pac4j/issues/595","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pac4j/pac4j","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pac4j/pac4j/issues/595/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pac4j/pac4j/issues/595/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pac4j/pac4j/issues/595/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j/pull/595","id":160181724,"number":595,"title":"Kerberos implementation","user":{"login":"garpinc","id":1929156,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1929156?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc","html_url":"https://github.com/garpinc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":8,"created_at":"2016-06-14T13:30:35Z","updated_at":"2016-08-06T06:43:09Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pac4j/pac4j/pulls/595","html_url":"https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j/pull/595","diff_url":"https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j/pull/595.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j/pull/595.patch"},"body":"I know you guys said you won't accept a kerberos implementation for whatever reasons.. But I wanted to make sure that the work I've done is somewhere. We are using a 1.8 pac4j version of this with our clients. The rationale in my mind for this is as follows. We create software that's distributed to multiple clients and each of them have there own security requirements. Our software allowed them to configure in the kind of security they want and we're using pac4j as that library. Even though kerberos may be supported via other mechanisms using pac4j as the common integration layer provides value for us. I'm not sure how to implement unit tests yet and until I know you're going to include it there's no point making the effort. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pac4j/pac4j/issues/comments/238009202","html_url":"https://github.com/pac4j/pac4j/pull/595#issuecomment-238009202","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pac4j/pac4j/issues/595","id":238009202,"user":{"login":"garpinc","id":1929156,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1929156?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc","html_url":"https://github.com/garpinc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/garpinc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-06T06:43:09Z","updated_at":"2016-08-06T06:43:09Z","body":"Yes. I do still plan to get back to it. "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"garpinc"}}