{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/issues/338","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/issues/338/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/issues/338/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/issues/338/events","html_url":"https://github.com/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/issues/338","id":176331042,"number":338,"title":"Baseline and Masterplan results are inconsistent","user":{"login":"martin-mosteiro","id":18548065,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/18548065?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/martin-mosteiro","html_url":"https://github.com/martin-mosteiro","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martin-mosteiro/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martin-mosteiro/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martin-mosteiro/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martin-mosteiro/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martin-mosteiro/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martin-mosteiro/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martin-mosteiro/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martin-mosteiro/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/martin-mosteiro/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/labels/Priority%201","name":"Priority 1","color":"e11d21"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/milestones/4","html_url":"https://github.com/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/milestones/M1.5%20MIBS%202016","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/milestones/4/labels","id":1882795,"number":4,"title":"M1.5 MIBS 2016","description":"Bugfixes from M1 done. Includes port to 10.4","creator":{"login":"daren-thomas","id":2969564,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2969564?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/daren-thomas","html_url":"https://github.com/daren-thomas","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daren-thomas/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daren-thomas/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daren-thomas/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daren-thomas/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daren-thomas/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daren-thomas/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daren-thomas/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daren-thomas/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/daren-thomas/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":2,"closed_issues":56,"state":"open","created_at":"2016-07-14T09:11:37Z","updated_at":"2016-09-17T04:17:06Z","due_on":"2016-09-09T00:00:00Z","closed_at":null},"comments":8,"created_at":"2016-09-12T09:26:37Z","updated_at":"2016-09-17T08:58:23Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The results for the same buildings change widely between the baseline and masterplan scenarios.\r\n\r\n**Baseline:**\r\n![screen shot 2016-09-12 at 11 11 30 copy](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/18548065/18430745/13f4da46-78da-11e6-9133-abce6ccdb967.png)\r\nNote: during the CEA workshop, we noticed that some buildings (E.G. the ETH Hauptgebäude) had extremely high heating demands caused by the fact that the space was defined as 100% office space. This is no longer the case here, even though the building is still defined as 100% offices.\r\n\r\n**Masterplan:**\r\n![screen shot 2016-09-12 at 11 12 08 copy](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/18548065/18430744/13f4a9f4-78da-11e6-9b24-cafa3e367dc9.png)\r\nThe demand for various buildings here (including the aforementioned ETH HG) are very different, even though none of their characteristics are changed.\r\n\r\nA few caveats:\r\n* I ran the radiation script for both cases with Zurich weather in the command line because of the problems described in #337 \r\n* Other than the buildings that are demolished and the new buildings in the masterplan scenario, every building's characteristics (geometry, occupancy, age, supply systems) are constant for both scenarios **EXCEPT** for:\r\n* Some very small buildings' occupancies were changed in the baseline scenario (from office occupancy to parking) by @JIMENOFONSECA and @amraladdin but not in the masterplan scenario. These changes, however, **do not** explain the differences in the energy demand for buildings such as the ETH HG.\r\n* I did try to adjust these occupancies in the masterplan scenario to keep both cases constant, but this caused problems in the demand calculation (after changing these occupancies, not all building's demand was included in the calculation)\r\n\r\nCan someone else please test these scenarios to see if they get the same results? @amraladdin @JIMENOFONSECA @daren-thomas "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/issues/comments/247758354","html_url":"https://github.com/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/issues/338#issuecomment-247758354","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/architecture-building-systems/CEAforArcGIS/issues/338","id":247758354,"user":{"login":"JIMENOFONSECA","id":8973186,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8973186?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/JIMENOFONSECA","html_url":"https://github.com/JIMENOFONSECA","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JIMENOFONSECA/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JIMENOFONSECA/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JIMENOFONSECA/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JIMENOFONSECA/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JIMENOFONSECA/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JIMENOFONSECA/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JIMENOFONSECA/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JIMENOFONSECA/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JIMENOFONSECA/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-17T08:58:23Z","updated_at":"2016-09-17T08:58:23Z","body":"@martin-mosteiro just try to debug it and see where the inputs or outputs change. while the demand script run. could the technique of Daren work in this case? apparently the inputs are different according to daren. \r\n\r\nif you are running it via pycharm, maybe it is taking the wrong default inputs? probably weather data?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"JIMENOFONSECA"}}