{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/479","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ericniebler/range-v3","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/479/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/479/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/479/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/479","id":180700627,"number":479,"title":"Raising the issue of Iterator concepts in the TS","user":{"login":"vinniefalco","id":1503976,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1503976?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/vinniefalco","html_url":"https://github.com/vinniefalco","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vinniefalco/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vinniefalco/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vinniefalco/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vinniefalco/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vinniefalco/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vinniefalco/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vinniefalco/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vinniefalco/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vinniefalco/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":11,"created_at":"2016-10-03T17:40:07Z","updated_at":"2016-10-04T23:24:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I have raised a problem with the Networking TS requirement of **BidirectionalIterator** in some concepts:\r\nhttps://github.com/cplusplus/networking-ts/issues/42\r\n\r\nThey suggested I bring it up with the Range TS, so here it is! I am not terribly familiar with the Range TS (although I've used Boost.Range before). Is this the appropriate venue? And is it something that could get attention?\r\n\r\nThanks\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/comments/251542089","html_url":"https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/479#issuecomment-251542089","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/479","id":251542089,"user":{"login":"ericniebler","id":225757,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/225757?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ericniebler","html_url":"https://github.com/ericniebler","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ericniebler/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ericniebler/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ericniebler/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ericniebler/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ericniebler/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ericniebler/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ericniebler/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ericniebler/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ericniebler/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-04T23:24:13Z","updated_at":"2016-10-04T23:24:13Z","body":"You seem to be missing Casey's point. Concept requirements can't just be casually dropped. The fact that the Filesystem TS does that doesn't make it a good idea or something to emulate. With what algorithms are such iterators guaranteed to work? Only the ones that accept InputIterators. As specified in the standard, these iterators are _not_ ForwardIterators, and they won't be until the Ranges TS lands, or until someone backports the proxy iterators work to STL1."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ericniebler"}}