{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/accord-net/framework/issues/264","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/accord-net/framework","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/accord-net/framework/issues/264/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/accord-net/framework/issues/264/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/accord-net/framework/issues/264/events","html_url":"https://github.com/accord-net/framework/issues/264","id":164849384,"number":264,"title":"Analysis of 'Accord.Net' source code by PVS-Studio static code analyzer","user":{"login":"InkViziT0r","id":10921236,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10921236?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/InkViziT0r","html_url":"https://github.com/InkViziT0r","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/InkViziT0r/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/InkViziT0r/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/InkViziT0r/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/InkViziT0r/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/InkViziT0r/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/InkViziT0r/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/InkViziT0r/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/InkViziT0r/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/InkViziT0r/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-07-11T14:22:18Z","updated_at":"2016-07-11T14:22:18Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Developers of PVS-Studio C/C++/C# static analyzer present their check report of the source code of 'Accord.Net' in the article, containing the review of the most suspicious code fragments they discovered.\r\n\r\nYou can read article at the official site:\r\nhttp://www.viva64.com/en/b/0410/"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"InkViziT0r"}}