{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/websockets/ws/issues/709","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/websockets/ws","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/websockets/ws/issues/709/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/websockets/ws/issues/709/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/websockets/ws/issues/709/events","html_url":"https://github.com/websockets/ws/issues/709","id":148489806,"number":709,"title":"Still the fastest RFC-6455 WebSocket implementation?","user":{"login":"binarykitchen","id":177641,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/177641?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/binarykitchen","html_url":"https://github.com/binarykitchen","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/binarykitchen/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/binarykitchen/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/binarykitchen/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/binarykitchen/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/binarykitchen/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/binarykitchen/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/binarykitchen/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/binarykitchen/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/binarykitchen/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-04-14T21:40:30Z","updated_at":"2016-05-10T19:49:06Z","closed_at":null,"body":"See https://github.com/alexhultman/uWebSockets/issues/56"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/websockets/ws/issues/comments/218270341","html_url":"https://github.com/websockets/ws/issues/709#issuecomment-218270341","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/websockets/ws/issues/709","id":218270341,"user":{"login":"NoelAbrahams","id":1106823,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1106823?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoelAbrahams","html_url":"https://github.com/NoelAbrahams","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoelAbrahams/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoelAbrahams/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoelAbrahams/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoelAbrahams/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoelAbrahams/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoelAbrahams/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoelAbrahams/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoelAbrahams/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/NoelAbrahams/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-05-10T19:49:06Z","updated_at":"2016-05-10T19:49:06Z","body":"[According to uWebSockets](https://github.com/alexhultman/uWebSockets#benchmarks-table) they seem signficantly faster and more scalable (in terms of memory consumption):\r\n\r\n\r\n**Memory scaling**: µWS is 52x as lightweight\r\n**Connection performance**: µWS is 21x as performant\r\n**Short message throughput**: µWS is 23x as performant\r\n**Huge message throughput**: µWS is 2x as performant\r\n\r\n\r\nThey have also provided [details on ***why***](https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/4ccpsa/%C2%B5websockets_highly_scalable_c11_websocket_server/) they are faster."}}