{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apigee/apigee-deploy-maven-plugin/issues/53","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apigee/apigee-deploy-maven-plugin","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apigee/apigee-deploy-maven-plugin/issues/53/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apigee/apigee-deploy-maven-plugin/issues/53/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apigee/apigee-deploy-maven-plugin/issues/53/events","html_url":"https://github.com/apigee/apigee-deploy-maven-plugin/issues/53","id":174898694,"number":53,"title":"Assertion fails when management API call returns 2 deployed revisions","user":{"login":"arunz6161","id":4381612,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4381612?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/arunz6161","html_url":"https://github.com/arunz6161","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arunz6161/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arunz6161/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arunz6161/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arunz6161/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arunz6161/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arunz6161/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arunz6161/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arunz6161/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arunz6161/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-09-03T14:08:44Z","updated_at":"2016-09-03T14:08:44Z","closed_at":null,"body":"There is a valid scenario where 2 or more revisions could be deployed in the same env for a proxy given that their basepaths are different. In such a setup, seamless deployment using the plugin would fail as it asserts only against the first revision returned by the management server . The fix would need the plugin to loop through all the returned revisions and validate against the same."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"arunz6161"}}