{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-ephys/next-gen-system/issues/6","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-ephys/next-gen-system","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-ephys/next-gen-system/issues/6/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-ephys/next-gen-system/issues/6/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-ephys/next-gen-system/issues/6/events","html_url":"https://github.com/open-ephys/next-gen-system/issues/6","id":183102862,"number":6,"title":"replace i2c bus with bus for long twisted pairs","user":{"login":"jvoigts","id":1414052,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1414052?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jvoigts","html_url":"https://github.com/jvoigts","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jvoigts/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jvoigts/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jvoigts/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jvoigts/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jvoigts/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jvoigts/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jvoigts/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jvoigts/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jvoigts/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-ephys/next-gen-system/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":9,"created_at":"2016-10-14T17:09:59Z","updated_at":"2016-10-18T16:17:52Z","closed_at":null,"body":"we currently spec an i2c bus on the daughter board connector, on a twisted pair. This is not ideal becuase of the TP.\r\nWhile i2c should work, maybe switching to something like rs-485 would be cleaner.\r\n\r\nthere seem to be solutions for this such as \r\nhttp://www.nxp.com/documents/application_note/AN11075.pdf"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-ephys/next-gen-system/issues/comments/254560222","html_url":"https://github.com/open-ephys/next-gen-system/issues/6#issuecomment-254560222","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/open-ephys/next-gen-system/issues/6","id":254560222,"user":{"login":"aacuevas","id":1830303,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1830303?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/aacuevas","html_url":"https://github.com/aacuevas","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aacuevas/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aacuevas/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aacuevas/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aacuevas/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aacuevas/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aacuevas/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aacuevas/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aacuevas/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aacuevas/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-18T16:17:52Z","updated_at":"2016-10-18T16:17:52Z","body":"Yeah, let's ask Reid about his current implementation.\r\nHaving a small uC can be useful in some boards but is a bit of an overhead on others while a simple eeprom is a very simple and lightweight solution (and nothing prevents a board from having uC with a slave interface in another address).\r\n\r\nAlso, I've been checking and most, if not all, i2c eeproms actually have the same address bits (which was a concern), so it makes things even easier."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"aacuevas"}}