{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/7106","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/7106/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/7106/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/7106/events","html_url":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/7106","id":171604888,"number":7106,"title":"Fix #25476 -- Make introspection work regardless of table owner","user":{"login":"socram8888","id":515068,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/515068?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888","html_url":"https://github.com/socram8888","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2016-08-17T08:45:07Z","updated_at":"2016-08-22T17:14:17Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/pulls/7106","html_url":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/7106","diff_url":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/7106.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/7106.patch"},"body":"Fix for https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25476"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/comments/241482835","html_url":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/7106#issuecomment-241482835","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/issues/7106","id":241482835,"user":{"login":"socram8888","id":515068,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/515068?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888","html_url":"https://github.com/socram8888","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/socram8888/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-22T17:14:17Z","updated_at":"2016-08-22T17:14:17Z","body":"Okay, I've finally triaged the reason my patch wasn't passing that test, and fixed it.\r\n\r\nOriginal version was returning ```[author_id, title]``` for columns related to that constraint, and mine was returning ```[title, author_id]```.\r\n\r\nFrom a database standpoint either would be correct and they both do exactly the same, but apparently Django expects columns to be returned in the same order they were introduced in the \"unique together\" constraint (a bit dangerous IMHO, because that means to delete a constraint you *need to know in what order they were originally specified*)"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"socram8888"}}