{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zulip/zulip/issues/312","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zulip/zulip","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zulip/zulip/issues/312/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zulip/zulip/issues/312/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zulip/zulip/issues/312/events","html_url":"https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/312","id":117376344,"number":312,"title":"Document Zulip Logging Privacy and security model","user":{"login":"Fhajad","id":4419484,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4419484?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fhajad","html_url":"https://github.com/Fhajad","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fhajad/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fhajad/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fhajad/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fhajad/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fhajad/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fhajad/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fhajad/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fhajad/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fhajad/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zulip/zulip/labels/documentation","name":"documentation","color":"c7def8"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-11-17T15:17:24Z","updated_at":"2016-03-31T21:47:20Z","closed_at":"2016-03-31T21:47:20Z","body":"With all the information sent thru Zulip for messages and streams, with root access to the backend server how difficult is it to read the raw messages contained there between users? We're concerned, at least regarding private message streams, of a possibly rogue admin being able to read messages across the company they have no business being involved in."}}