{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WICG/inert/issues/39","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WICG/inert","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WICG/inert/issues/39/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WICG/inert/issues/39/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WICG/inert/issues/39/events","html_url":"https://github.com/WICG/inert/issues/39","id":192991414,"number":39,"title":"Spec: naming collision with `inert` as in `<template>`","user":{"login":"alice","id":95208,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/95208?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice","html_url":"https://github.com/alice","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/alice/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2016-12-01T23:24:37Z","updated_at":"2016-12-02T17:18:16Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This may cause confusion. Can we come up with a better term for this concept?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WICG/inert/issues/comments/264508917","html_url":"https://github.com/WICG/inert/issues/39#issuecomment-264508917","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WICG/inert/issues/39","id":264508917,"user":{"login":"bkardell","id":870501,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/870501?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bkardell","html_url":"https://github.com/bkardell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bkardell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bkardell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bkardell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bkardell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bkardell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bkardell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bkardell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bkardell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bkardell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-12-02T17:18:16Z","updated_at":"2016-12-02T17:18:16Z","body":"@Garbee I'm not sure what you mean by \"our definition\".  Which one? I don't think either of them are what I was doing for photos and videos, that was simply me describing that in a different universe one could reasonably have suggested use the word \"inert\" in that context as well. In other words, if there are N features that can be thought of as 'inert' then it's quite plausible that the number of times you could bump into this is not limited to 2, but actually all the permutations of N.  \r\n\r\nThat comment about videos had nothing to do with my surprise that HTML had used inert for describing dialogs.  I was involved in the conversations for template inert and this never came up, that's why I was surprised there.\r\n\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"bkardell"}}