{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/issues/231","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/issues/231/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/issues/231/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/issues/231/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/issues/231","id":180508302,"number":231,"title":"Creating a write-only team for Charcoal projects","user":{"login":"ArtOfCode-","id":10406565,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10406565?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtOfCode-","html_url":"https://github.com/ArtOfCode-","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtOfCode-/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtOfCode-/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtOfCode-/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtOfCode-/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtOfCode-/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtOfCode-/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtOfCode-/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtOfCode-/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ArtOfCode-/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-10-02T11:40:10Z","updated_at":"2016-10-02T11:52:12Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I'm leaving this here because it seems like more people see our GitHub issues than they do chat messages.\r\n\r\nThis was an idea I had a couple days ago. What if we created another team on the Charcoal-SE organization, with *write* access to all of Charcoal's projects (as opposed to the *admin* access that the Core team have)? That allows us to give people who commonly contribute to the projects write access, instead of forcing them to rely on pull requests - which, let's be honest, aren't much fun when you're just waiting around.\r\n\r\nI'm thinking of people like Kyll, Ashish, and angussidney, who have sent us the majority of our recent pull requests. There are probably more people I've missed out there, but that's the general idea.\r\n\r\nObviously, they'd need to be people (a) who we can trust, and (b) with privileges for Smokey. I'm not proposing adding just anyone who submits a PR; rather, people who have a track record of good contributions. Those people are a big resource for Charcoal; this would reduce the friction to them helping out.\r\n\r\nThoughts?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/issues/comments/250967570","html_url":"https://github.com/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/issues/231#issuecomment-250967570","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/issues/231","id":250967570,"user":{"login":"DavidPostill","id":7079224,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7079224?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidPostill","html_url":"https://github.com/DavidPostill","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidPostill/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidPostill/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidPostill/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidPostill/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidPostill/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidPostill/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidPostill/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidPostill/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DavidPostill/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-02T11:52:12Z","updated_at":"2016-10-02T11:52:12Z","body":"I would have no objection :). If I understood the code and was proficient in js I would be contributing myself. Unfortunately js is a language I have never learnt (although I know many other programming languages ...)"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"DavidPostill"}}