{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/epigen/pypiper/issues/20","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/epigen/pypiper","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/epigen/pypiper/issues/20/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/epigen/pypiper/issues/20/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/epigen/pypiper/issues/20/events","html_url":"https://github.com/epigen/pypiper/issues/20","id":181797338,"number":20,"title":"proposed change to output file naming","user":{"login":"nsheff","id":5271009,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5271009?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff","html_url":"https://github.com/nsheff","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-10-08T01:58:14Z","updated_at":"2016-12-20T21:24:17Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Currently, pypiper output files start with the pipeline name and then the file type, like PIPE_log.md and PIPE_profile.md, etc. (see [docs](http://pypiper.readthedocs.io/en/latest/outputs.html))\n\nI did it this way to make it so you could find stuff by multiple pipelines easier. But the thing is, I've realized that 95% of the time we're running only a single pipeline, ad it's annoying to have 4 files all starting with PIPE_\\* for tab completion.\n\nPIPE_log.md\nPIPE_profile.md\nPIPE_status.flag \nPIPE_commands.md\n\ninstead, these could be:\n\nlog_PIPE.md\nprofile_PIPE.md\nstatus_PIPE.flag\n\netc. The advantage being tab completion is now much easier for folders running a single pipeline, which is most of the time.\n\nBut this is kind of a big change. Any opposed? Ideas?\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/epigen/pypiper/issues/comments/268363620","html_url":"https://github.com/epigen/pypiper/issues/20#issuecomment-268363620","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/epigen/pypiper/issues/20","id":268363620,"user":{"login":"nsheff","id":5271009,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5271009?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff","html_url":"https://github.com/nsheff","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nsheff/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-12-20T21:24:17Z","updated_at":"2016-12-20T21:24:17Z","body":"of course, but I think you're missing the point... I'm just talking about looking at a single sample, and saving the split second of an extra tab-completion step, because everything starts with the same string. typing out a 'find' command is already way overkill for the use case I'm trying to describe."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"nsheff"}}