{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hnordquist/INCC6/issues/135","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hnordquist/INCC6","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hnordquist/INCC6/issues/135/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hnordquist/INCC6/issues/135/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hnordquist/INCC6/issues/135/events","html_url":"https://github.com/hnordquist/INCC6/issues/135","id":193905252,"number":135,"title":"Measurement parameters not always used in list mode (not sure if this is an issue)","user":{"login":"davidbrought","id":24234147,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/24234147?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidbrought","html_url":"https://github.com/davidbrought","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidbrought/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidbrought/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidbrought/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidbrought/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidbrought/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidbrought/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidbrought/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidbrought/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidbrought/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":285684228,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hnordquist/INCC6/labels/List%20Mode","name":"List Mode","color":"bfd4f2","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":14,"created_at":"2016-12-06T22:35:20Z","updated_at":"2016-12-09T13:40:23Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Testing 6.18.32 in list mode some more.. \r\n\r\nIf the detector you are using is set-up to have fast accidentals (selected under measurement parameters) the other detector specific measurement parameters are only used when the analysis method is \"Fast Multiplicity\", if \"Multiplicity\" is used they are not used. The opposite is true for having fast accidentals off where \"Multiplicity\" needs to be used to use the detector specific parameters. \r\n\r\nIs there a difference between multiplicity and fast multiplicity analysis? If there isn't would it be possible to combine them and always use the detector parameters? (unless the gate width and predelay are specifically changed in the Analysis Params)\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hnordquist/INCC6/issues/comments/266016021","html_url":"https://github.com/hnordquist/INCC6/issues/135#issuecomment-266016021","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hnordquist/INCC6/issues/135","id":266016021,"user":{"login":"hnordquist","id":5940271,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5940271?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/hnordquist","html_url":"https://github.com/hnordquist","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hnordquist/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hnordquist/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hnordquist/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hnordquist/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hnordquist/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hnordquist/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hnordquist/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hnordquist/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hnordquist/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-12-09T13:40:23Z","updated_at":"2016-12-09T13:40:23Z","body":"Joe, it is confusing and so we plan to put together a requirements doc\n(description) of how this should look. I have done what needed doing for\nthe demo next week. Are you in from now until Christmas?\n\nOn Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:54 PM, J F Longo <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n\n> Ok the current behavior is a first try, so I can make the modifications\n> suggested. The basic concept is the measurement parameters are used to\n> create a new multiplicity analyzer and then you are presented with the LM\n> option tabs, so that you may examine and change the three parameters.\n> Predefining a multiplicity analyzer should cause the acquire ops to\n> automatically pick it and proceed\n>\n> Sent from my iPhone\n>\n> This email message is intended only for the use of the named recipient.\n> Information contained in this email message and its attachments may be\n> privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the\n> intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this\n> communication to others. Also please notify the sender by replying to this\n> message and then delete it from your system.\n>\n> —\n> You are receiving this because you commented.\n> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub\n> <https://github.com/hnordquist/INCC6/issues/135#issuecomment-265946655>,\n> or mute the thread\n> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFqkL0TG0KeOWsXrN3_KrBpgpxwReFFNks5rGPs1gaJpZM4LF-Fr>\n> .\n>\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"hnordquist"}}