{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CommonAccord/Cmacc-Source/issues/1","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CommonAccord/Cmacc-Source","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CommonAccord/Cmacc-Source/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CommonAccord/Cmacc-Source/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CommonAccord/Cmacc-Source/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/CommonAccord/Cmacc-Source/issues/1","id":165932461,"number":1,"title":"language vs. jurisdiction -- DE|EN|FR or DE|FR|US ?  ","user":{"login":"HazardJ","id":1336943,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1336943?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ","html_url":"https://github.com/HazardJ","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-07-16T14:52:25Z","updated_at":"2016-07-18T11:34:25Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Naming of zF/Agt:\r\n\r\nThere are of course many, many issues of naming, each of which is resolved here as best I see at the moment.  Some reflect long-standing decisions, for better and for worse. \r\n\r\nAn issue that currently confronts me is whether we should deal with language independently of jurisdiction, or as part of it.  This now seems clearer to me than it has before - even before this morning - 2016-07-16.  \r\n\r\nWhat now seems clear (let's see if it gets foggy again) is: \r\n\r\nThe system of /00|EN|FR|DE|NL| etc. should be based on jurisdiction, not language.  Jurisdictions are where people actually work, and the determination of adequacy is courts, not linguistics departments.  If there are multiple languages (/CA|CH|LU| etc. or even /US-ES)  This also reduces tugs-of-war over the col{o/ou}r issues, as well as customs and legal requirements.  As I write this, the answer seems ever clear clearer. \r\n\r\nThe focus should be on documents adapted to a particular jurisdiction."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CommonAccord/Cmacc-Source/issues/comments/233305320","html_url":"https://github.com/CommonAccord/Cmacc-Source/issues/1#issuecomment-233305320","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CommonAccord/Cmacc-Source/issues/1","id":233305320,"user":{"login":"HazardJ","id":1336943,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1336943?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ","html_url":"https://github.com/HazardJ","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/HazardJ/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-18T11:34:25Z","updated_at":"2016-07-18T11:34:25Z","body":"Good to expose, compare, contrast views and reasons!!  A decision to change jurisdiction in the middle of drafting is very rare.  i) most transactions are domestic - so no issue at all, ii) serious drafting starts with the notion of jurisdiction, otherwise you don't know the background, iii) if you change jurisdiction you have to change the document, so you always end up with a document in a language for a jurisdiction.  A generic \"English language\" document, for instance, would not be adequate anywhere, and give rise to conflicts in style, spelling and law.  "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"HazardJ"}}