{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/california-civic-data-coalition/django-calaccess-raw-data/issues/1163","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/california-civic-data-coalition/django-calaccess-raw-data/issues/1163/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/california-civic-data-coalition/django-calaccess-raw-data/issues/1163/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/california-civic-data-coalition/django-calaccess-raw-data/issues/1163/events","html_url":"https://github.com/california-civic-data-coalition/django-calaccess-raw-data/issues/1163","id":125528449,"number":1163,"title":"Backwards compatability for Django 1.8","user":{"login":"palewire","id":9993,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9993?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/palewire","html_url":"https://github.com/palewire","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/palewire/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/palewire/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/palewire/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/palewire/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/palewire/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/palewire/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/palewire/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/palewire/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/palewire/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-01-08T02:26:44Z","updated_at":"2016-01-08T02:26:44Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The more I think about it, the more I think we should try to use Django's own support rules [spelled out here](https://www.djangoproject.com/download/) in that green and red table. If we go by that, we should be supporting Django 1.9 and 1.8 right now."}}