{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zotonic/zotonic/issues/1256","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zotonic/zotonic","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zotonic/zotonic/issues/1256/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zotonic/zotonic/issues/1256/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zotonic/zotonic/issues/1256/events","html_url":"https://github.com/zotonic/zotonic/issues/1256","id":151597134,"number":1256,"title":"merge emqtt?","user":{"login":"arjan","id":24722,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/24722?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/arjan","html_url":"https://github.com/arjan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arjan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arjan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arjan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arjan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arjan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arjan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arjan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arjan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arjan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-04-28T09:57:35Z","updated_at":"2016-04-28T09:57:35Z","closed_at":null,"body":"It seems emqtt (https://github.com/emqtt/emqttd) has had quite some improvements and is under active development again.\r\nCurrently zotonic uses a fork of emqtt, mainly because the original repo was unmaintained. Now that it's active again, it might make sense to investigate whether we can depend on the new repo instead of maintaining our own fork."}}