{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/18F/doi-extractives-data/issues/1231","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/18F/doi-extractives-data/issues/1231/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/18F/doi-extractives-data/issues/1231/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/18F/doi-extractives-data/issues/1231/events","html_url":"https://github.com/18F/doi-extractives-data/issues/1231","id":129253460,"number":1231,"title":"Update language on Explore > Exports","user":{"login":"gemfarmer","id":4803473,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4803473?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer","html_url":"https://github.com/gemfarmer","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-01-27T20:05:42Z","updated_at":"2016-01-29T16:48:11Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The language on [Exports](https://useiti.doi.gov/explore/exports/) isn't quite correct. In the left column it states that:\r\n\r\n`Because the data only lists the top 25 exports for each state, some states show as ‘no data’ on our map because extractive industries don't rank among their 25 top exports.`\r\n\r\nIt is actually drawing from 3 commodities, but only for the top 25 states (by export). @mentastc, I'm pretty sure this is actually the reason why we didn't want to total $ or %. The total for dollars would have been a total of the exports from the top 25 states, but would likely be interpreted as being a total for the *entire* US.\r\n\r\nThe language in the exploration heading, should also be changed to reflect the nature of this data.\r\n`Exports from all commodities in the top 25 export states (2014)`? @coreycaitlin @meiqimichelle ideas for something better?\r\n\r\n![screen shot 2016-01-27 at 2 03 58 pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/4803473/12626549/d64078c0-c4fe-11e5-82b2-d75c736cbaae.png)"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/18F/doi-extractives-data/issues/comments/176856314","html_url":"https://github.com/18F/doi-extractives-data/issues/1231#issuecomment-176856314","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/18F/doi-extractives-data/issues/1231","id":176856314,"user":{"login":"gemfarmer","id":4803473,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4803473?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer","html_url":"https://github.com/gemfarmer","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gemfarmer/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-01-29T16:48:11Z","updated_at":"2016-01-29T16:48:11Z","body":"@coreycaitlin haha yes. yes we can pair on this – I think a short conversation would clarify things quite a bit."}}