{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jordansissel/fpm/issues/1149","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jordansissel/fpm","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jordansissel/fpm/issues/1149/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jordansissel/fpm/issues/1149/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jordansissel/fpm/issues/1149/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm/issues/1149","id":163667207,"number":1149,"title":"[Query] Can fpm support package formats that bundle dependencies? (AppImage, Flatpak, Guix, gx, Snappy)","user":{"login":"kwill","id":229415,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/229415?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kwill","html_url":"https://github.com/kwill","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kwill/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kwill/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kwill/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kwill/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kwill/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kwill/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kwill/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kwill/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kwill/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2016-07-04T12:30:45Z","updated_at":"2016-12-14T03:55:34Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Some new(ish) package formats bundle (most) dependencies in the package itself. (Their common goals seem to include multi-distro support and \"solving the dependency problem\".) Is this approach supportable?\n\nThese formats include:\n- AppImage http://appimage.org\n- Flatpak http://flatpak.org\n- Guix https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Packaging-Guidelines.html [1]\n- gx https://github.com/whyrusleeping/gx [2]\n- Snappy https://snapcraft.io\n\nIf this is possible, support to/from each format presumably warrants separate tickets? Which would be the best resource to point the maintainers of AppImage et al to, if they wanted to contribute to fpm themselves?\n\n[1] [2] Guix and gx have other implementation details that would require individual investigation.\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jordansissel/fpm/issues/comments/266936150","html_url":"https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm/issues/1149#issuecomment-266936150","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jordansissel/fpm/issues/1149","id":266936150,"user":{"login":"elopio","id":617831,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/617831?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/elopio","html_url":"https://github.com/elopio","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elopio/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elopio/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elopio/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elopio/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elopio/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elopio/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elopio/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elopio/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/elopio/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-12-14T03:55:34Z","updated_at":"2016-12-14T03:55:34Z","body":"@hatt I don't know much about fpm, but I initially imagined that it would generate a snapcraft.yaml, and then call snapcraft to generate the package. Why do you want to generate the package with ruby inside FPM?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"elopio"}}