{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/joblib/joblib/issues/411","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/joblib/joblib","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/joblib/joblib/issues/411/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/joblib/joblib/issues/411/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/joblib/joblib/issues/411/events","html_url":"https://github.com/joblib/joblib/issues/411","id":181337715,"number":411,"title":"Move to py.tests?","user":{"login":"podshumok","id":314085,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/314085?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/podshumok","html_url":"https://github.com/podshumok","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/podshumok/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/podshumok/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/podshumok/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/podshumok/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/podshumok/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/podshumok/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/podshumok/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/podshumok/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/podshumok/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":40,"created_at":"2016-10-06T06:55:27Z","updated_at":"2016-12-19T17:29:47Z","closed_at":null,"body":"nosetests is no longer maintained and contains deprecated code (inspect.getargspec). It might not keep working with future versions of python. Should we create a plan to move to py.tests?\n\nOn the other hand py.test is quite compatible with nose and offers nice way to write less code.\n\nSee also:\nhttps://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/7319\nhttps://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/7384\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/joblib/joblib/issues/comments/268025637","html_url":"https://github.com/joblib/joblib/issues/411#issuecomment-268025637","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/joblib/joblib/issues/411","id":268025637,"user":{"login":"karandesai-96","id":10494087,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10494087?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/karandesai-96","html_url":"https://github.com/karandesai-96","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karandesai-96/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karandesai-96/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karandesai-96/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karandesai-96/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karandesai-96/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karandesai-96/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karandesai-96/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karandesai-96/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/karandesai-96/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-12-19T17:29:47Z","updated_at":"2016-12-19T17:29:47Z","body":"@lesteve Nothing much. Simply tackling each module to parametrize the tests... I guess we'll be done by that. I won't be exercising parametrization unless it looks as clear as a `for` loop iterating test cases.."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"karandesai-96"}}