{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bvaughn/react-virtualized-select/issues/20","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bvaughn/react-virtualized-select","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bvaughn/react-virtualized-select/issues/20/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bvaughn/react-virtualized-select/issues/20/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bvaughn/react-virtualized-select/issues/20/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bvaughn/react-virtualized-select/issues/20","id":171715599,"number":20,"title":"Filtering Performance with Large Lists (2000+)","user":{"login":"turnerniles","id":8146241,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8146241?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles","html_url":"https://github.com/turnerniles","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-08-17T17:32:53Z","updated_at":"2016-08-17T18:06:54Z","closed_at":"2016-08-17T17:45:42Z","body":"After playing around with the virtualized select (without filtering) it works performantly even with 1 million records. However when filtering based on user input it comes to a crawl around 2000-3000 items. Would you have any suggestion as to how to make the filtering more performant?\r\n\r\nLooking at the react-select repo issues, a few people are having the same problem. \r\nhttps://github.com/JedWatson/react-select/issues/807\r\nhttps://github.com/JedWatson/react-select/issues/739\r\n\r\nBut I don't believe react-virtualized-select solves the issue."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bvaughn/react-virtualized-select/issues/comments/240496909","html_url":"https://github.com/bvaughn/react-virtualized-select/issues/20#issuecomment-240496909","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bvaughn/react-virtualized-select/issues/20","id":240496909,"user":{"login":"turnerniles","id":8146241,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8146241?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles","html_url":"https://github.com/turnerniles","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turnerniles/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-17T18:06:54Z","updated_at":"2016-08-17T18:06:54Z","body":"@bvaughn I agree with the above; however, react-select cannot performantly render 3000+ items without using react-virtualized-select. Would react-select want to implement the faster js search libs if they don't support large lists? React-select does allow advanced filtering options. Is it something that could be built in react-virtualized-select on top of react-select? "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"turnerniles"}}