{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/goldfirere/singletons/issues/149","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/goldfirere/singletons","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/goldfirere/singletons/issues/149/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/goldfirere/singletons/issues/149/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/goldfirere/singletons/issues/149/events","html_url":"https://github.com/goldfirere/singletons/issues/149","id":159938091,"number":149,"title":"Remove Proxy from promoted classes","user":{"login":"goldfirere","id":1958003,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1958003?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/goldfirere","html_url":"https://github.com/goldfirere","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goldfirere/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goldfirere/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goldfirere/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goldfirere/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goldfirere/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goldfirere/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goldfirere/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goldfirere/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/goldfirere/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/goldfirere/singletons/labels/Blocked%20upstream","name":"Blocked upstream","color":"006b75"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-06-13T12:24:43Z","updated_at":"2016-06-13T12:24:43Z","closed_at":null,"body":"In GHC8, there should be no reason to use `Proxy` in a promoted class. But efforts at removing this proxy have been stymied. I've not investigated fully, but here is what I know:\r\n\r\n- The problem seems unrelated to TH. When I copied spliced code back into the buffer, the error did not change.\r\n- There's a chance that the error is due to CUSKiness: there's a definition which looks CUSKy but I want non-CUSK inference.\r\n- Further probing led to goldfirere/ghc#69. So I gave up. But I doubt that's the real reason for the error.\r\n\r\nIn any case, I'm pretty sure this is blocked upstream."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"goldfirere"}}