{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rancher/longhorn/issues/128","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rancher/longhorn","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rancher/longhorn/issues/128/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rancher/longhorn/issues/128/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rancher/longhorn/issues/128/events","html_url":"https://github.com/rancher/longhorn/pull/128","id":158527756,"number":128,"title":"RW timout retry","user":{"login":"kp6","id":9426415,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9426415?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6","html_url":"https://github.com/kp6","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-06-04T22:43:55Z","updated_at":"2016-06-04T22:44:28Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rancher/longhorn/pulls/128","html_url":"https://github.com/rancher/longhorn/pull/128","diff_url":"https://github.com/rancher/longhorn/pull/128.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/rancher/longhorn/pull/128.patch"},"body":"Notes:\r\n- writes are retried\r\n- but direct block write I/O is supposed to be atomic on a block level. So concurrent 'same write' ops idempotence should still hold..."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rancher/longhorn/issues/comments/223782304","html_url":"https://github.com/rancher/longhorn/pull/128#issuecomment-223782304","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rancher/longhorn/issues/128","id":223782304,"user":{"login":"kp6","id":9426415,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9426415?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6","html_url":"https://github.com/kp6","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kp6/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-06-04T22:44:28Z","updated_at":"2016-06-04T22:44:28Z","body":"\r\n\r\nanother thought on coexistence of ping and r/w timeouts:\r\n\r\n-    should we disable the pings in the presence of I/O activity so that it activates only in the absence of I/O in say 2..15s period?\r\n\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"kp6"}}