{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/betaflight/betaflight/issues/1153","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/betaflight/betaflight","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/betaflight/betaflight/issues/1153/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/betaflight/betaflight/issues/1153/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/betaflight/betaflight/issues/1153/events","html_url":"https://github.com/betaflight/betaflight/issues/1153","id":176302216,"number":1153,"title":"Sparky 2.0 arming problems","user":{"login":"BayaroX","id":15889637,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/15889637?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/BayaroX","html_url":"https://github.com/BayaroX","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BayaroX/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BayaroX/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BayaroX/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BayaroX/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BayaroX/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BayaroX/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BayaroX/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BayaroX/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/BayaroX/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":8,"created_at":"2016-09-12T06:22:26Z","updated_at":"2016-10-29T11:24:34Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi!\r\n\r\nWe have 2 Sparky 2.0 _(in 2 complete technical identical quads - build with same parts)_.\r\n> ZMR250 Frame, Cobra 2204-2300kV, FVT LittleBee 30A BLHeli_S, Matek 5in1 PDB, minimOSD _(connected or not makes no difference)_, Runcam Swift 600TVL _(connected or not makes no difference)_, Diatone SP2 180 VTX _(connected or not makes no difference)_, Sparky 2.0, Spektrum Satellit, 3S LiPo battery\r\n\r\n**At one Sparky 2.0 (quad 1) it was/is never possible to arm the quad.**\r\n\r\n**At the other Sparky 2.0 (quad 2) it is possible to arm the quad with this method:**\r\n-- Connect quad with battery, turn on Spektrum transmitter, wait a few seconds, blue led is blinking, quad can not be armed, turn off Spektrum transmitter, turn on Spektrum transmitter, blue led will stop blinking/flashing after a few seconds and the quad can be armed.\r\n\r\n**This method won`t work on quad 2:**\r\n-- Connect quad with battery, turn on Spektrum transmitter, wait a few seconds, blue led is flashing, quad can not be armed, disconnect battery from quad, connect battery with quad, blue led is flashing, quad can not be armed.\r\n\r\n**Additional informations:**\r\n-- Spektrum satellit is connect to the 3-pin RCVR holes at Sparky 2.0 (UART 6, which is the RCVR \"port\" at Sparky 2.0, is in \"Ports\" set to \"Serial RX\" and in \"Configuration\" to \"Spektrum 2048\")\r\n-- All the time it`s possible to see stick-moves from Spektrum transmitter in \"Receiver-Tab\" in Betaflight-Configurator, so the bind between Spektrum transmitter and Spektrum satellit seems to be fine\r\n-- CPU is at only 5% (with baro and acc on)\r\n-- CPU is at only 1 or 2% (with baro and acc off)\r\n-- Looptimes both set to 8KHZ (this is the highest possible value - i would expect that there is a higher value possible?! Cause CPU is max. at 5%). I have also tried lower looptimes, but no changes.\r\n-- All tried with \"set sbus_inverter = OFF/ON\"\r\n-- All tried with BF 3.0.0 RC14 and BF 3.0.0 stable\r\n-- With Naze32 10DOF (instead off Sparky 2.0) arming works perfect\r\n\r\nAny ideas?\r\n\r\nThanks in advance and kind regards,\r\nChris"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/betaflight/betaflight/issues/comments/257086173","html_url":"https://github.com/betaflight/betaflight/issues/1153#issuecomment-257086173","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/betaflight/betaflight/issues/1153","id":257086173,"user":{"login":"davidh-","id":9096606,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9096606?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidh-","html_url":"https://github.com/davidh-","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidh-/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidh-/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidh-/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidh-/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidh-/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidh-/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidh-/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidh-/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davidh-/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-29T11:24:34Z","updated_at":"2016-10-29T11:24:34Z","body":"@MotoLab setting moron_threshold to 128 fixed it for me. Are there any negative implications by setting it to 128?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"davidh-"}}