{"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dankelley/oce/comments/17069994","html_url":"https://github.com/dankelley/oce/commit/02918cfe5cebf056bdbdb96ce81f0faade98cfc4#commitcomment-17069994","id":17069994,"user":{"login":"dankelley","id":99469,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/99469?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dankelley","html_url":"https://github.com/dankelley","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dankelley/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dankelley/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dankelley/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dankelley/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dankelley/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dankelley/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dankelley/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dankelley/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dankelley/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"position":null,"line":null,"path":"","commit_id":"02918cfe5cebf056bdbdb96ce81f0faade98cfc4","created_at":"2016-04-12T16:18:15Z","updated_at":"2016-04-12T16:18:15Z","body":"Thanks, I removed that line. PS. at one time in the past, I thought `missing` referred back to the function call. Later, I realized that if you assign to the item, then `missing` will return `FALSE`. So that was also at play in this spot of the code, and it's something to look out for, generally, when things seem odd.  I'm not clear that it would lead to many problems, but the point is that once something has been assigned, any further `missing` actions in that scope will always get skipped."}}