{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/servo/ipc-channel/issues/61","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/servo/ipc-channel","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/servo/ipc-channel/issues/61/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/servo/ipc-channel/issues/61/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/servo/ipc-channel/issues/61/events","html_url":"https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/61","id":145381741,"number":61,"title":"Linux: Fix receive for message sizes close to packet size","user":{"login":"antrik","id":19555,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/19555?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/antrik","html_url":"https://github.com/antrik","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/antrik/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/antrik/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/antrik/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/antrik/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/antrik/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/antrik/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/antrik/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/antrik/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/antrik/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2016-04-02T15:02:45Z","updated_at":"2016-04-06T17:52:38Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/servo/ipc-channel/pulls/61","html_url":"https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/61","diff_url":"https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/61.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/61.patch"},"body":"Fixes https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/10260\r\n\r\nThis supersedes https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/60 -- which is basically the same change; but now we have a test case, and an improved commit message. (Pointing out the bug fix; and also fixing a very confusing typo in the title...)\r\n\r\nThe extra commit does some refactoring necessary for the new test case."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/servo/ipc-channel/issues/comments/206486944","html_url":"https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/61#issuecomment-206486944","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/servo/ipc-channel/issues/61","id":206486944,"user":{"login":"bors-servo","id":4368172,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4368172?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bors-servo","html_url":"https://github.com/bors-servo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bors-servo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bors-servo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bors-servo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bors-servo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bors-servo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bors-servo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bors-servo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bors-servo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bors-servo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-04-06T17:52:38Z","updated_at":"2016-04-06T17:52:38Z","body":":umbrella: The latest upstream changes (presumably #62) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts."}}