{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/certtools/intelmq/issues/715","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/certtools/intelmq","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/certtools/intelmq/issues/715/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/certtools/intelmq/issues/715/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/certtools/intelmq/issues/715/events","html_url":"https://github.com/certtools/intelmq/issues/715","id":180004760,"number":715,"title":"\"Deactivated Switch\" for Collectors.","user":{"login":"dmth","id":4152441,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4152441?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmth","html_url":"https://github.com/dmth","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmth/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmth/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmth/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmth/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmth/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmth/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmth/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmth/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmth/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-09-29T09:58:50Z","updated_at":"2016-09-29T11:12:22Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Since Bots were split into different classes, it's possible to enhance certain types of bots. That is a very good development.\r\n\r\nI'd like to add a \"Deactivated Switch\" to the CollectorBot, in order to enable the deactivation of Collectors. When a bot is starting / restarted it checks if it was deactivated, and automatically stops if this is the case.\r\n\r\nThis is useful for a temporary deactivation of collectors , for instance when feeds are providing erroneous data. Restarting the whole bot-net would not start such bots, once a \"deactivated switch\" is in place.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/certtools/intelmq/issues/comments/250437528","html_url":"https://github.com/certtools/intelmq/issues/715#issuecomment-250437528","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/certtools/intelmq/issues/715","id":250437528,"user":{"login":"aaronkaplan","id":750019,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/750019?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/aaronkaplan","html_url":"https://github.com/aaronkaplan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aaronkaplan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aaronkaplan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aaronkaplan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aaronkaplan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aaronkaplan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aaronkaplan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aaronkaplan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aaronkaplan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aaronkaplan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-29T11:12:22Z","updated_at":"2016-09-29T11:12:22Z","body":"\n> On 29 Sep 2016, at 12:10, Dustin Demuth <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n> \n> But please let's call this flag \"enabled\" [Y/N]\n> That's possible. The default for enabled should be \"yes\", right?\ncorrect\n\n> Or should a bot be deactivated unless it's explicitly activated?\n> \n> Is there a guideline how to deal with such boolean Input (Y/N, 0/1, True/False [and string representations therof])? Because user-input might be manifold.\n> \n\nConcerning the syntax of boolean in the config files: in JSON of course it needs to be a boolean value . That is a clearly defined syntax for JSON.\nHowever, AFAIK the manager does not syntax check its input - in case that's what you meant (?)\n\nNot sure if I understood the question correctly.\n\n> —\n> You are receiving this because you commented.\n> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.\n> \n\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"aaronkaplan"}}