{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll/issues/4471","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll/issues/4471/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll/issues/4471/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll/issues/4471/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll/issues/4471","id":131566804,"number":4471,"title":"Hard wrap modification","user":{"login":"borisschapira","id":284742,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/284742?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/borisschapira","html_url":"https://github.com/borisschapira","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/borisschapira/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/borisschapira/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/borisschapira/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/borisschapira/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/borisschapira/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/borisschapira/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/borisschapira/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/borisschapira/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/borisschapira/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll/labels/discussion","name":"discussion","color":"006b75"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-02-05T06:20:43Z","updated_at":"2016-02-05T11:42:49Z","closed_at":null,"body":"There was a modificiation into the way kramdown interprets wraps between jekyll 3.0 and jekyll 3.1.\r\nWhat was written in Markdown as :\r\n\r\n```\r\n> First line.\r\n> Second line.\r\n``` \r\n\r\nWas, before, hard wrapped (`<br/>` where included, even if it's not Markdown standard, it's more consistent with GMF) :\r\n> First line.\r\n> Second line.\r\n\r\n\r\nNow appears like :\r\n> First line. Second line."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll/issues/comments/180313542","html_url":"https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll/issues/4471#issuecomment-180313542","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll/issues/4471","id":180313542,"user":{"login":"envygeeks","id":99763,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/99763?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/envygeeks","html_url":"https://github.com/envygeeks","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/envygeeks/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/envygeeks/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/envygeeks/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/envygeeks/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/envygeeks/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/envygeeks/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/envygeeks/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/envygeeks/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/envygeeks/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-05T11:42:49Z","updated_at":"2016-02-05T11:42:49Z","body":"It seems Github hardwraps comments (for very good reason, ticket comments should probably wrap for easier formatting so they can do less cleanup.) However if you look at:  https://gist.github.com/envygeeks/4755dec0a39ea2e6103b and https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll/blob/master/site/_docs/assets.md it doesn't hardwrap (and this is what we base our default on.)"}}