{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hercules-390/hyperion/issues/143","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hercules-390/hyperion","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hercules-390/hyperion/issues/143/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hercules-390/hyperion/issues/143/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hercules-390/hyperion/issues/143/events","html_url":"https://github.com/hercules-390/hyperion/issues/143","id":171210827,"number":143,"title":"MISSING: \"runtest\" regression test for STFL/STFLE instructions","user":{"login":"Fish-Git","id":1486786,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1486786?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git","html_url":"https://github.com/Fish-Git","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hercules-390/hyperion/labels/MISSING","name":"MISSING","color":"0066FF"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2016-08-15T16:47:58Z","updated_at":"2016-08-18T02:24:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Issue title says it all: we need a \"runtest\" test for the STFL and STFLE instructions to ensure our Facility List bits are getting set correctly depending on initial ARCHLVL setting as well as run-time architectural mode.\r\n\r\nI'd do it myself except I'm absolutely _swamped_ right now.\r\n\r\nIs there anyone else out there who could take care of this for us?\r\n\r\nThanks!"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hercules-390/hyperion/issues/comments/240606316","html_url":"https://github.com/hercules-390/hyperion/issues/143#issuecomment-240606316","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/hercules-390/hyperion/issues/143","id":240606316,"user":{"login":"Fish-Git","id":1486786,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1486786?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git","html_url":"https://github.com/Fish-Git","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Fish-Git/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-18T02:24:13Z","updated_at":"2016-08-18T02:24:13Z","body":"> This is rather ugly. Thoughts anyone?\r\n\r\nWe don't mention it anywhere in Hercules documentation (but we probably _should!_) but in my HercGUI Help file I have the following Note in the section describing the CPU Model sysetm configuration value:\r\n\r\n_**Note**:  Neither HercGUI nor the Hercules emulator itself makes any attempt to try and emulate all aspects and/or features of a given CPU model. The CPU model number is currently purely cosmetic only. It defines only what value the STIDP (Store CPU ID) instruction will store, and nothing more._\r\n\r\nI can't recall whether we've (as a group) have ever officially discussed it, but I rather suspect we do _not_ want to travel down the path of trying to actually accurately emulate each and every particular model's behavior. Attempting to do so would be pure madness IMHO.\r\n\r\nHowever, maybe we should, at the minimum, choose an official \"Hercules reference model\"? &lt;shrug&gt; Dunno.\r\n\r\nAs it stands I believe our code _attempt_ to behave identically to whatever IBM's latest and greatest most powerful z model happens to be (i.e. attempts as much as possible to have all the latest features (bells and whistles)).\r\n\r\nBottom line: I'm not quite sure _how_ best to handle our Facility List bits. I'm still sort of scratching my head over it, just like you John."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"Fish-Git"}}