{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/leereilly/swot/issues/1094","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/leereilly/swot","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/leereilly/swot/issues/1094/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/leereilly/swot/issues/1094/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/leereilly/swot/issues/1094/events","html_url":"https://github.com/leereilly/swot/issues/1094","id":141449855,"number":1094,"title":"Move from using file directories to hash or other data structure","user":{"login":"rachelmyers","id":209641,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/209641?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rachelmyers","html_url":"https://github.com/rachelmyers","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rachelmyers/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rachelmyers/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rachelmyers/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rachelmyers/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rachelmyers/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rachelmyers/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rachelmyers/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rachelmyers/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rachelmyers/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":true},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-03-17T01:31:25Z","updated_at":"2016-05-23T16:44:16Z","closed_at":"2016-05-23T16:44:16Z","body":"It's expensive to include this gem in a project because domains directory is 30M. Would a PR that converts the directories into a nested hash, and changes the library to navigate the hash rather than the files, be accepted?\r\n\r\nIf people have tried this before, were there stumbling blocks I should know about?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"rachelmyers"}}