{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/issues/1202","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/issues/1202/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/issues/1202/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/issues/1202/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/pull/1202","id":125826911,"number":1202,"title":"Capacity Increases FAQ: more prominently link to roadmap","user":{"login":"harding","id":61096,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/61096?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/harding","html_url":"https://github.com/harding","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/harding/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/harding/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/harding/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/harding/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/harding/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/harding/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/harding/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/harding/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/harding/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/labels/Core","name":"Core","color":"bfe5bf"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-01-10T15:42:44Z","updated_at":"2016-01-10T18:06:07Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/pulls/1202","html_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/pull/1202","diff_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/pull/1202.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/pull/1202.patch"},"body":"I'm told some people were confusing the FAQ itself for the roadmap; this should help remove the confusion.  This becomes the first question/answer in the document:\r\n\r\n![2016-01-10-104013_634x193_scrot](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/61096/12222316/bea71406-b786-11e5-8a25-8ef573aa87f7.png)\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/issues/comments/170375514","html_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/pull/1202#issuecomment-170375514","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/issues/1202","id":170375514,"user":{"login":"kanzure","id":101238,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/101238?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kanzure","html_url":"https://github.com/kanzure","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kanzure/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kanzure/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kanzure/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kanzure/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kanzure/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kanzure/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kanzure/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kanzure/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kanzure/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-01-10T18:06:07Z","updated_at":"2016-01-10T18:06:07Z","body":"ACK, because the FAQ previously linked to the roadmap, the FAQ was written regarding that roadmap, and I have noticed users confused about \"what roadmap\", even though the FAQ already linked to the roadmap in at least one other location.\r\n\r\nAt most I could support a NACK on mentioning the number of git commits. It's useful context, and I wish I had a better way to phrase that, but I don't. For this reason I am OK with leaving it in (or even removing it) at the moment.\r\n\r\n@aquentus, you have made a factually false statement (that \"there was previously only one team with a seemingly working Bitcoin implementation\"). This github issue thread is not a good place to try to rewrite history. Sorry.\r\n\r\nYour NACK sounds more like a NACK regarding hosting any content about Bitcoin Core at all. This pull request is about a particular change to some existing content about Bitcoin Core."}}