{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lgtmco/lgtm-docs/issues/7","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lgtmco/lgtm-docs","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lgtmco/lgtm-docs/issues/7/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lgtmco/lgtm-docs/issues/7/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/lgtmco/lgtm-docs/issues/7/events","html_url":"https://github.com/lgtmco/lgtm-docs/issues/7","id":160460312,"number":7,"title":"Self-hosted licencing fee is unclear","user":{"login":"wking","id":209920,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/209920?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/wking","html_url":"https://github.com/wking","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wking/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wking/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wking/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wking/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wking/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wking/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wking/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wking/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wking/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-06-15T16:02:44Z","updated_at":"2016-06-15T17:48:55Z","closed_at":"2016-06-15T17:48:55Z","body":"Notes about self-hosting eventually requiring a licensing fee landed in 63afbc69 (added details about enterprise options, 2015-12-08) and were updated in a391a45f (updated docs, 2016-01-19).  We're considering using this project in the Open Container Initiative (opencontainers/runc#916), but wanted clarity on how you see that sort of thing working before committing.  Do you plan to continue to maintain the project under the Apache 2.0 license?  If so, is the “licensing fee” going to be more like a “suggested donation”?  Or is the “licensing fee” actually more like a support contract (i.e. “you can self-host for free, but you can only email me for troubleshooting help if you have a support contract”)?  The “Technical support is only provided to paying account holders…” language from a391a45f suggests the support contract interpretation.  If that is accurate, adjusting the self-hosting phrasing to make it explicit would make me a lot more comfortable ;)."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"bradrydzewski"}}