{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VDBWRAIR/ngs_mapper/issues/196","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VDBWRAIR/ngs_mapper","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VDBWRAIR/ngs_mapper/issues/196/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VDBWRAIR/ngs_mapper/issues/196/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VDBWRAIR/ngs_mapper/issues/196/events","html_url":"https://github.com/VDBWRAIR/ngs_mapper/issues/196","id":141624086,"number":196,"title":"Feature request - standardized scale in a single run for QualDepth graphics?","user":{"login":"mmelendrez","id":2855130,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2855130?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mmelendrez","html_url":"https://github.com/mmelendrez","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mmelendrez/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mmelendrez/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mmelendrez/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mmelendrez/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mmelendrez/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mmelendrez/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mmelendrez/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mmelendrez/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mmelendrez/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2016-03-17T15:50:50Z","updated_at":"2016-03-17T16:46:47Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Low priority:\r\n\r\nWould it be possible to add an option for -same scale for graphical output? It's hard to do direct comparisons of samples within a run otherwise because the scales are different - see https://www.vdbpm.org/issues/10988 as an example. The scale could be set to the scale of the sample that had to largest scale. So for instance in Issue 10988 both samples would be on the 11070 scale of 0-20000 (or 22000). \r\n\r\nI ask this because when I compare both samples it looks like there is a primer issue in region 5300-6100 in sample 11070 that does not appear in 11079 but direct comparison is hard because scales are different. I think I'm right though because it looks like 11070 got about 1000 reads and 11079 got about 6000 in that region.\r\n\r\nMake sense? thoughts?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VDBWRAIR/ngs_mapper/issues/comments/197969547","html_url":"https://github.com/VDBWRAIR/ngs_mapper/issues/196#issuecomment-197969547","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/VDBWRAIR/ngs_mapper/issues/196","id":197969547,"user":{"login":"necrolyte2","id":378659,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/378659?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/necrolyte2","html_url":"https://github.com/necrolyte2","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/necrolyte2/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/necrolyte2/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/necrolyte2/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/necrolyte2/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/necrolyte2/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/necrolyte2/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/necrolyte2/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/necrolyte2/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/necrolyte2/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-17T16:46:47Z","updated_at":"2016-03-17T16:46:47Z","body":"haha, ya that is what I meant"}}