{"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jhellis3/Stockfish/comments/18657212","html_url":"https://github.com/jhellis3/Stockfish/commit/bbebf25dbe09ab734a342a76428f9461562f75ba#commitcomment-18657212","id":18657212,"user":{"login":"jhellis3","id":3711245,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3711245?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhellis3","html_url":"https://github.com/jhellis3","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhellis3/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhellis3/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhellis3/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhellis3/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhellis3/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhellis3/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhellis3/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhellis3/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhellis3/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"position":null,"line":null,"path":null,"commit_id":"bbebf25dbe09ab734a342a76428f9461562f75ba","created_at":"2016-08-16T15:04:21Z","updated_at":"2016-08-16T15:04:21Z","body":"@lucabrivio It is probably much closer than it first appears.  At 16 we would normally have 16/22 = 0.727273, while the patch gives ln(17)/4 = 0.708303, and values ramp up more quickly from 0.  The basic idea was just to give diminishing returns above 16 instead of a hard cap, but the shape of the curve is probably just wrong (scales up too quickly I imagine)."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jhellis3"}}