{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MagneticParticleImaging/MDF/issues/42","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MagneticParticleImaging/MDF","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MagneticParticleImaging/MDF/issues/42/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MagneticParticleImaging/MDF/issues/42/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MagneticParticleImaging/MDF/issues/42/events","html_url":"https://github.com/MagneticParticleImaging/MDF/issues/42","id":175450952,"number":42,"title":"Request of extending specific parameters for use with patches","user":{"login":"MandyA","id":9882336,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9882336?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/MandyA","html_url":"https://github.com/MandyA","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MandyA/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MandyA/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MandyA/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MandyA/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MandyA/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MandyA/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MandyA/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MandyA/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MandyA/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MagneticParticleImaging/MDF/labels/feature%20request","name":"feature request","color":"eb6420"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-09-07T09:08:36Z","updated_at":"2016-09-07T10:45:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"We are currently changing our whole structure to MDF (simulation, measurement data, ...) and like to store more data in one file. This is mainly a request for MPS data that should be stored in one file. Therefore, we like to request the possibility to extend some parameters by one dimension. A good possibility I see is to use patches. As for several other fields it could be decided if the dimensionality is dependent on the number of patches. The following parameters would be affected:\r\n\r\n- all parameters in group study or at least study/experiment, study/description, study/reference, study/simulation\r\n- all parameters in group tracer\r\n- parameter acquisition/time\r\n- parameter acquisition/drivefield/averages\r\n- parameter acquisition/drivefield/repetitionTime\r\n- all parameters in groupd reconstruction\r\n\r\nDo you have any comments, suggestions, ideas on that?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MagneticParticleImaging/MDF/issues/comments/245243423","html_url":"https://github.com/MagneticParticleImaging/MDF/issues/42#issuecomment-245243423","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MagneticParticleImaging/MDF/issues/42","id":245243423,"user":{"login":"tknopp","id":3109172,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3109172?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tknopp","html_url":"https://github.com/tknopp","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tknopp/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tknopp/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tknopp/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tknopp/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tknopp/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tknopp/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tknopp/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tknopp/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tknopp/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-07T10:45:13Z","updated_at":"2016-09-07T10:45:13Z","body":"Ok this is the hardest request ;-) \r\nI had already a short discussion with Anselm but will have to think a little bit more about this.\r\n\r\nJust a very short comment: The idea of the format in its current form was not to allow storing multiple \"measurements\" into one file. So if you have an imaging protocol where you make multiple sequential measurements you would usually end up with one file per measurement. This is also how Bruker currently handles it.\r\n\r\nUsing the patches could be a workaround for what you have in mind but I would like to understand a little bit more the advantages of for instance using different tracers and storing it into just one file."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"tknopp"}}