{"push_id":1326597395,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/nom","head":"1f29cb23bd6fd59dcb7ffd16a3a6f1d8f34fea0d","before":"83d733cbf89ecac12eb4245cd9ef53ee1eaae3c0","commits":[{"sha":"31eba778f3d109e23ea93b977c06db68f3f2686c","author":{"name":"usev6","email":"6de7d910583f949f6e31807d5b8e69b3011423c2@aglaz.de"},"message":"Report type name in type constraint error on JVM\n\nIf an instance object was passed where a type object was\nrequired, or vice versa, Rakudo on MoarVM already reported\nthe name of the required type (commit 9a1616ed63).\n\nNow Rakudo on JVM does the same. Fixes RT #126124 for rakudo-j.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rakudo/rakudo/commits/31eba778f3d109e23ea93b977c06db68f3f2686c"},{"sha":"1f29cb23bd6fd59dcb7ffd16a3a6f1d8f34fea0d","author":{"name":"lizmat","email":"b22eab0f8b90624f1d0707d98d92c955df1890b9@dijkmat.nl"},"message":"Merge pull request #891 from usev6/rt126124\n\nReport type name in type constraint error on JVM.\r\n\r\nEven though errors are reported, building with this works fine for me, so I'm merging.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rakudo/rakudo/commits/1f29cb23bd6fd59dcb7ffd16a3a6f1d8f34fea0d"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"lizmat"}}