{"push_id":1025232915,"size":8,"distinct_size":8,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"0dfa4a4f30fbfedd259eceae5a067f60904fae65","before":"0bbcfa5a6feb92cd781978d3757f251aaa8cf0bc","commits":[{"sha":"744e4dbceed5ad46e8f5b3e52b122961cee657e1","author":{"email":"ae86a985811ad650849e18e2730905d68b96b36d@google.com","name":"Eran Messeri"},"message":"Ticket 57: Redacted wildcards should not be allowed\n\nSome modifications to the redaction text as well as indication that redacted\nwildcards are not allowed.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/robstradling/certificate-transparency-rfcs/commits/744e4dbceed5ad46e8f5b3e52b122961cee657e1"},{"sha":"6645038cb5a8881fa72d96d4bac9b2596a432531","author":{"email":"ae86a985811ad650849e18e2730905d68b96b36d@google.com","name":"Eran Messeri"},"message":"Indicate logs SHOULD reuse SCTs.\n\nExplain that re-using SCTs is desirable to limit the log's ability of fingerprinting clients.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/robstradling/certificate-transparency-rfcs/commits/6645038cb5a8881fa72d96d4bac9b2596a432531"},{"sha":"0ced62b447d11a0d79cc8acd6e1beda8709a6858","author":{"email":"ae86a985811ad650849e18e2730905d68b96b36d@google.com","name":"Eran Messeri"},"message":"Fixing a few obsolete v1 references.\n\nIncludes changing the LogEntryType to TransItem and fixing indentation.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/robstradling/certificate-transparency-rfcs/commits/0ced62b447d11a0d79cc8acd6e1beda8709a6858"},{"sha":"61aa610262ff2ab151200fcf89e55034bc00bf0e","author":{"email":"ae86a985811ad650849e18e2730905d68b96b36d@google.com","name":"Eran Messeri"},"message":"Overly redacted certs: Remove requirement from CAs\n\nAlso point to PSL as an example list of domains for which redacted\nprecerts should not be issued.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/robstradling/certificate-transparency-rfcs/commits/61aa610262ff2ab151200fcf89e55034bc00bf0e"},{"sha":"8edc0ff0fd5df418063d8e810fbf3927e4e49cfd","author":{"email":"ae86a985811ad650849e18e2730905d68b96b36d@google.com","name":"Eran Messeri"},"message":"Adopted Rob's suggested text.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/robstradling/certificate-transparency-rfcs/commits/8edc0ff0fd5df418063d8e810fbf3927e4e49cfd"},{"sha":"cdc5585440a524a31520a89a932836a23e95deb4","author":{"email":"ae86a985811ad650849e18e2730905d68b96b36d@google.com","name":"Eran Messeri"},"message":"Adopting Rob's suggested wording.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/robstradling/certificate-transparency-rfcs/commits/cdc5585440a524a31520a89a932836a23e95deb4"},{"sha":"1049bc98995aaf10f7dff01bf6ba5728b49ce0aa","author":{"email":"ae86a985811ad650849e18e2730905d68b96b36d@google.com","name":"Eran Messeri"},"message":"Fixing two nits.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/robstradling/certificate-transparency-rfcs/commits/1049bc98995aaf10f7dff01bf6ba5728b49ce0aa"},{"sha":"0dfa4a4f30fbfedd259eceae5a067f60904fae65","author":{"email":"ae86a985811ad650849e18e2730905d68b96b36d@google.com","name":"Eran"},"message":"Ticket 145: Clarify how clients should treat SCTs with timestamp in the future.\n\nThe sentence being modified was brought as an example of an action prescribed\nwithout clear consequences of this action, so \"black box\" testing of conformance\nto this aspect cannot be validated.\n\nReplaced the text so it is in-line with other ways of treating SCTs.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/robstradling/certificate-transparency-rfcs/commits/0dfa4a4f30fbfedd259eceae5a067f60904fae65"}]}