{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/toml/issues/74","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/toml","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/toml/issues/74/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/toml/issues/74/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/toml/issues/74/events","html_url":"https://github.com/BurntSushi/toml/issues/74","id":58177383,"number":74,"title":"Version bump?","user":{"login":"tianon","id":161631,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/161631?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tianon","html_url":"https://github.com/tianon","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tianon/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tianon/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tianon/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tianon/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tianon/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tianon/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tianon/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tianon/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tianon/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-02-19T07:50:45Z","updated_at":"2016-03-28T21:12:00Z","closed_at":"2016-03-28T21:12:00Z","body":"Any way we could get a `v0.1.1` or `v0.2.0`, especially since some nice features like #61 have merged since the `v0.1.0` tag? :smile:"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/toml/issues/comments/202582539","html_url":"https://github.com/BurntSushi/toml/issues/74#issuecomment-202582539","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/toml/issues/74","id":202582539,"user":{"login":"cespare","id":318501,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/318501?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cespare","html_url":"https://github.com/cespare","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cespare/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cespare/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cespare/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cespare/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cespare/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cespare/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cespare/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cespare/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cespare/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-28T21:12:00Z","updated_at":"2016-03-28T21:12:00Z","body":"I feel that your packaging system should not depend on Go library authors tagging or versioning their repos, since that's not part of the typical Go toolchain and workflow. IMO, having end-user applications vendor their dependencies is the only sensible solution, and it's the one that's supported by the `go` tool itself. If you are trying to shoehorn Go applications into a packaging framework with a different opinion about how things should be done, you'll have to account for the fact that a Go package is just a VCS repo and nothing more. (And it sounds like that accounting has been done, judging by @tianon's comment about \"hacks\".)\r\n\r\nThat said, since there's already a version tag, I'm happy to add a new tag to indicate forward progress. I just added v0.2.0 at current master."}}