{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/333","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/333/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/333/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/333/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/333","id":138901633,"number":333,"title":"Support integer mulHigh ?","user":{"login":"flagxor","id":7519520,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7519520?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/flagxor","html_url":"https://github.com/flagxor","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flagxor/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flagxor/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flagxor/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flagxor/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flagxor/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flagxor/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flagxor/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flagxor/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/flagxor/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-03-07T06:45:08Z","updated_at":"2016-03-07T16:03:43Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Multiply returning the high 16-bits for int16x8 is supported by Intel (PMULHW).\r\nA potential SIMD.js customer interested in codecs came across the lack of this.\r\nWhat do folks think of adding it?\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/comments/193316048","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/333#issuecomment-193316048","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/ecmascript_simd/issues/333","id":193316048,"user":{"login":"sunfishcode","id":4503403,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4503403?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sunfishcode","html_url":"https://github.com/sunfishcode","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sunfishcode/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sunfishcode/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sunfishcode/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sunfishcode/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sunfishcode/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sunfishcode/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sunfishcode/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sunfishcode/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sunfishcode/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-07T16:03:43Z","updated_at":"2016-03-07T16:03:43Z","body":"My big-picture view is that the current iteration of SIMD.js is primarily about delivering basic functionality and establishing how SIMD integrates with JS in general, since that's a fairly complex undertaking in itself, and that there will be many iterations of the spec in the future where we can add all the other features we want.\r\n\r\nThat said, this would be a useful feature to add in such an iteration. What are the implementation prospects on NEON?"}}