{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eXistSolutions/LGPN-ling/issues/228","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eXistSolutions/LGPN-ling","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eXistSolutions/LGPN-ling/issues/228/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eXistSolutions/LGPN-ling/issues/228/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eXistSolutions/LGPN-ling/issues/228/events","html_url":"https://github.com/eXistSolutions/LGPN-ling/issues/228","id":147743584,"number":228,"title":"author field missing in table summary","user":{"login":"tuurma","id":449468,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/449468?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tuurma","html_url":"https://github.com/tuurma","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tuurma/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tuurma/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tuurma/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tuurma/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tuurma/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tuurma/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tuurma/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tuurma/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tuurma/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-04-12T12:58:44Z","updated_at":"2016-04-12T13:18:34Z","closed_at":"2016-04-12T13:18:34Z","body":"@hippodamie\r\n\r\n> We are oblige to put the author name of the ancient Source in the same box as the name of the book he has written, otherwise we do not see the author name in the visualisation window..\r\n> For example, for Babelyka, I had to put Iamb. (author), VP (reference) in the same box, and could not put Iamb. in the box Author.\r\n> \r\n> Why is it so ?\r\n> Could you improve it or do we have to input in the way I did ?\r\n\r\nI thought it was already fixed, but will check again and report back here."}}