{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43/events","html_url":"https://github.com/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43","id":131845272,"number":43,"title":"Consider GraphicsMagick instead of ImageMagick?","user":{"login":"mgcrea","id":108273,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/108273?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea","html_url":"https://github.com/mgcrea","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-02-06T11:11:09Z","updated_at":"2016-02-11T00:31:15Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I've used `graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat` instead of `imagemagick` in my images, as it seems to be the goto option these days. GraphicsMagick is a fork is concentrating on better performance and stability, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GraphicsMagick."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/comments/182656145","html_url":"https://github.com/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43#issuecomment-182656145","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43","id":182656145,"user":{"login":"yosifkit","id":896423,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/896423?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/yosifkit","html_url":"https://github.com/yosifkit","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yosifkit/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yosifkit/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yosifkit/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yosifkit/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yosifkit/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yosifkit/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yosifkit/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yosifkit/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yosifkit/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-11T00:31:15Z","updated_at":"2016-02-11T00:31:15Z","body":"From graphicsmagick.org, so it is probably biased:\r\n> Here are some reasons to prefer GraphicsMagick over ImageMagick:\r\n- GM is more efficient so it gets the job done faster using fewer resources.\r\n- GM is much smaller and lighter (3-5X smaller installation footprint).\r\n- GM is used to process billions of files at the world's largest photo sites (e.g. Flickr and Etsy).\r\n- GM does not conflict with other installed software.\r\n- GM suffers from fewer security issues and exploits.\r\n- GM valgrind's 100% clean (memcheck and helgrind).\r\n- GM comes with a comprehensive manual page.\r\n- GM provides API and ABI stability and managed releases that you can count on.\r\n- GM provides detailed yet comprehensible ChangeLog and NEWS files.\r\n- GM is available for free, and may be used to support both open and proprietary applications.\r\n- GM is distributed under an X11-style license (MIT License), approved by the Open Source Initiative, recommended for use by the OSSCC, and compatible with the GNU GPL.\r\n- GM source code is managed in Mercurial, a distributed source control management tool which supports management of local changes.\r\n- GM has 0.00 (zero) defects per 1000 lines of code (293,341 total lines included) according to Coverity analysis on May 25, 2015.\r\n- GM developers contribute to other free projects for the public good.\r\n"}}