{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/5954","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/travis-ci/travis-ci","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/5954/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/5954/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/5954/events","html_url":"https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/5954","id":151042390,"number":5954,"title":"Please add after_all_success or after_success_all","user":{"login":"sarbbottam","id":949380,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/949380?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarbbottam","html_url":"https://github.com/sarbbottam","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarbbottam/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarbbottam/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarbbottam/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarbbottam/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarbbottam/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarbbottam/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarbbottam/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarbbottam/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarbbottam/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-04-26T05:02:19Z","updated_at":"2016-04-26T05:02:19Z","closed_at":null,"body":"There have been many work arounds like, for example [travis-after-all](https://www.npmjs.com/package/travis-after-all), which times out; [condition-node-version](https://github.com/bahmutov/condition-node-version), which is good for only node build matrix.\r\n\r\nThere is no generic solution. I have no idea how complex or how simple the solution could be but I look forward to the resolution.\r\n\r\n---\r\n\r\nThere is no way to communicate or share thoughts in the [original issue](https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/929), as [it has been locked down over one and a half year](https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/929#issuecomment-60864849).\r\n\r\nIt would be great if you could share the current status on this it would be great.\r\n\r\nThanks!\r\n"}}