{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/back2dos/travix/issues/10","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/back2dos/travix","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/back2dos/travix/issues/10/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/back2dos/travix/issues/10/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/back2dos/travix/issues/10/events","html_url":"https://github.com/back2dos/travix/issues/10","id":153779212,"number":10,"title":"Distinct tests per target","user":{"login":"back2dos","id":509501,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/509501?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/back2dos","html_url":"https://github.com/back2dos","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/back2dos/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/back2dos/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/back2dos/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/back2dos/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/back2dos/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/back2dos/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/back2dos/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/back2dos/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/back2dos/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-05-09T13:43:35Z","updated_at":"2016-05-09T15:15:56Z","closed_at":null,"body":"To pick up what @fponticelli [said in another issue](https://github.com/back2dos/travix/issues/1#issuecomment-217263913):\r\n\r\n> Also it would be really cool to have tests that are distinct per target. That way you could decide to `allow_failures` per target and it would be easier to spot errors that are generated only on a specific target.\r\n\r\nI'm not sure where this is going. Somehow I think that (at least most of the time) it might be better to make the distinction in the tests and not the configuration. But that's a bit abstract. Could someone bring forward a couple of concrete use cases to discuss?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/back2dos/travix/issues/comments/217894322","html_url":"https://github.com/back2dos/travix/issues/10#issuecomment-217894322","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/back2dos/travix/issues/10","id":217894322,"user":{"login":"fponticelli","id":163915,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/163915?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/fponticelli","html_url":"https://github.com/fponticelli","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fponticelli/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fponticelli/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fponticelli/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fponticelli/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fponticelli/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fponticelli/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fponticelli/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fponticelli/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fponticelli/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-05-09T15:15:56Z","updated_at":"2016-05-09T15:15:56Z","body":"My case is mainly thx.core. It aims to be multi-target and incredibly (?) the most inconsistencies come from Java/C#, sometimes CPP and less frequently Python3. The same code is supposed to run consistently but it doesn't, the generators are simply too different to provide consistent results. So it has always been good for me to build against JS, commit my changes and see what platforms I should take care of."}}