{"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/roboterclubaachen/xpcc/comments/16865573","html_url":"https://github.com/roboterclubaachen/xpcc/commit/93b5c3bbe5d637d5be0f9013e2b136335bf892f7#commitcomment-16865573","id":16865573,"user":{"login":"salkinium","id":163066,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/163066?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/salkinium","html_url":"https://github.com/salkinium","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/salkinium/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/salkinium/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/salkinium/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/salkinium/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/salkinium/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/salkinium/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/salkinium/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/salkinium/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/salkinium/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"position":185,"line":75,"path":"README.md","commit_id":"93b5c3bbe5d637d5be0f9013e2b136335bf892f7","created_at":"2016-03-28T17:42:56Z","updated_at":"2016-03-28T17:42:56Z","body":"> If we only include the driver in devices that support it, we should get rid of the device-family=\"f1|f2|f4\" restriction in the driver.\r\n\r\n:+1: \r\n\r\n> what is the correct interpretation of the <driver> tag in a device file:\r\n\r\nFor `<driver type=\"uart\" name=\"stm32\" instance=\"1,2,3,4,5,6\"/>`:\r\n\r\n- `type=\"uart\"`: What? (Interface)\r\n- `name=\"stm32\"`: Where? (Implementation)\r\n- `instances=\"...\"`: How many?\r\n\r\nThis device implements interface `uart`, which is implemented in driver `uart/stm32` with *N* many instances."}}