{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moosefs/moosefs/issues/18","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moosefs/moosefs","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moosefs/moosefs/issues/18/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moosefs/moosefs/issues/18/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moosefs/moosefs/issues/18/events","html_url":"https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs/issues/18","id":171796882,"number":18,"title":"Can mfschunkserver and mfsmount support multiple ethernet ports？","user":{"login":"skyjally","id":9696323,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9696323?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/skyjally","html_url":"https://github.com/skyjally","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/skyjally/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/skyjally/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/skyjally/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/skyjally/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/skyjally/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/skyjally/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/skyjally/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/skyjally/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/skyjally/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-08-18T01:22:54Z","updated_at":"2016-09-06T20:29:24Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi，@acid-maker：\r\n       I have used moosefs for several weeks, in mfschunkserver and mfsmount machine, both of them have two ethernet ports. Could I use all ethernet ports to improve moosefs transfer efficiency?\r\n       Regards"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moosefs/moosefs/issues/comments/245080327","html_url":"https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs/issues/18#issuecomment-245080327","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/moosefs/moosefs/issues/18","id":245080327,"user":{"login":"oxide94","id":4892057,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4892057?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/oxide94","html_url":"https://github.com/oxide94","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oxide94/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oxide94/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oxide94/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oxide94/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oxide94/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oxide94/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oxide94/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oxide94/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oxide94/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-06T20:29:24Z","updated_at":"2016-09-06T20:29:24Z","body":"@skyjally: Link aggregation @oszafraniec mentioned is probably the solution you need. I'd also like to pay your attention to a feature which is built in MooseFS 3 - there's a possibility to separate \"data network\" (I/O network) from \"metadata network\".\r\n\r\nIt's available since MooseFS 3.0.74: `(master) added mapping chunkserver IP classes (allow to have separate network for I/O and separate for other activity)`.\r\n\r\nI'll do my best to describe it a bit tomorrow.\r\n\r\nPeter"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"oxide94"}}