{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nationalparkservice/places-data/issues/118","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nationalparkservice/places-data","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nationalparkservice/places-data/issues/118/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nationalparkservice/places-data/issues/118/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nationalparkservice/places-data/issues/118/events","html_url":"https://github.com/nationalparkservice/places-data/issues/118","id":103386050,"number":118,"title":"Investigate switching to management boundaries over legislative boundaries","user":{"login":"nateirwin","id":10443,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10443?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nateirwin","html_url":"https://github.com/nateirwin","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nateirwin/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nateirwin/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nateirwin/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nateirwin/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nateirwin/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nateirwin/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nateirwin/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nateirwin/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nateirwin/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nationalparkservice/places-data/labels/places-boundaries","name":"places-boundaries","color":"5319e7"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-08-26T23:22:16Z","updated_at":"2016-02-02T21:40:06Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This one is likely quite some time off, but IMR brought up that they are going to try to push a management boundary standard through the GIS program. This might be a good alternative for us to switch to - definitely after the initial Park Tiles 3 rollout is complete."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nationalparkservice/places-data/issues/comments/178840209","html_url":"https://github.com/nationalparkservice/places-data/issues/118#issuecomment-178840209","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nationalparkservice/places-data/issues/118","id":178840209,"user":{"login":"cwlawlis802","id":1238636,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1238636?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cwlawlis802","html_url":"https://github.com/cwlawlis802","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cwlawlis802/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cwlawlis802/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cwlawlis802/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cwlawlis802/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cwlawlis802/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cwlawlis802/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cwlawlis802/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cwlawlis802/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cwlawlis802/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-02T21:40:06Z","updated_at":"2016-02-02T21:40:06Z","body":"That is what Craig is drawing up for us. It won't be 100% park endorsed as \"management boundaries\" but very close to it. He's doing his best to conform the management boundaries to what we need for Park Tiles."}}