{"push_id":996098148,"size":1,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"edbb53d0598ac2a49a2ec9f94b7b8fc08b7f03f6","before":"630c845e7f0cf6514df17296d6d7502805f2e817","commits":[{"sha":"edbb53d0598ac2a49a2ec9f94b7b8fc08b7f03f6","author":{"email":"e8ccef0d579672eb34486e8afa814902e12059cf@gmail.com","name":"Scott Bronikowski"},"message":"26 Feb 16\n\n--Found bug in compute_and_save_asm.m where I forgot a dash in the\n  data-output-dirname.  Going to re-run all--tried the ASM build in an\n  interactive MATLAB window on save, and it only took ~15 minutes.  Modified\n  ralicra2016-detect-and-compute-{6,7,8} to only run the asm part.  Split is:\n  There are screens on:\n\t37395.save-3with1and2-6\t(02/26/2016 09:53:46 AM)\t(Detached)\n\t59974.akili-3with4-7\t(02/25/2016 10:28:06 PM)\t(Detached)\n\t54610.arivu-3with1and2-7\t(02/25/2016 10:09:43 PM)\t(Detached)\n\t53999.perisikan-3with1and2-8\t(02/25/2016 10:08:16 PM)\t(Detached)\n\t53580.aruco-3with4-6\t(02/25/2016 10:06:15 PM)\t(Detached)\n\t52628.save-3with4-8\t(02/25/2016 10:02:00 PM)\t(Detached)\n  6 Sockets in /var/run/screen/S-sbroniko.\n\n--Had error trying to start matlabpool on multiple machines at once--apparently\n  matlabpool accesses some file in my home dir, so all the machines were trying\n  to access it at the same time.  Just commented out the matlabpool open and\n  close lines in step_4_build_similarity_matrix.m.  Tried a quick run on save,\n  and it used all available cores.  Retrying the above.\n\n--ASM generation looks like it's working, but without matlabpool taking closer\n  to 2+ hours.  Not a showstopper, but will be a pain if I want to play around\n  with the m_factor (percent to compare) parameter.\n\n--Probably need to build a list/spreadsheet of what the found objects actually\n  are (and thus a correct labeling) for each of the 6 configurations\n  {3with1and2,3with4}x{6,7,8}.\n\n--After starting to build the ground truth above and looking at the plots with\n  Dan, figured out that all of the new methods yield too many false positives,\n  and labeling will most likely break because of these.  So instead going to go\n  back to the beginning and reimplement all old assumptions, but just penalize\n  with a 0 unary score (and not put into GM#1).\n\n--Making changes to the codetect-sort-templabel-ralicra2016 run stuff from 16\n  Feb.  Now have codetect-sort-templabel-iros2016 as the main call.  Changed\n  scott_proposals_similarity2.m to put filter (unary score = 0) for out of\n  bounds, w/in 5px of image edge, > world width thresh (2m)\n\n--Re-running (again) the job for iros (codetect-sort-templabel-asm-iros2016).\n  Should go automatically all the way through to the ASM, then can do labeling\n  on that.  Hopefully the plots and images will be identical to previous, so can\n  just use those.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/scottbronikowski/codetection/commits/edbb53d0598ac2a49a2ec9f94b7b8fc08b7f03f6"}]}