{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/omnia-md/conda-recipes/issues/568","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/omnia-md/conda-recipes","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/omnia-md/conda-recipes/issues/568/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/omnia-md/conda-recipes/issues/568/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/omnia-md/conda-recipes/issues/568/events","html_url":"https://github.com/omnia-md/conda-recipes/issues/568","id":169766679,"number":568,"title":"rdkit: Do we still need it in omnia?","user":{"login":"jchodera","id":3656088,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3656088?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera","html_url":"https://github.com/jchodera","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":13,"created_at":"2016-08-06T21:11:39Z","updated_at":"2016-09-05T00:15:14Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Since our [`omnia` version of `rdkit`](https://anaconda.org/omnia/rdkit/files) is out of date (2015.09.01) compared to the [official `rdkit` conda version](https://anaconda.org/rdkit/rdkit/files), should we drop it? Or update our own version?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/omnia-md/conda-recipes/issues/comments/244636840","html_url":"https://github.com/omnia-md/conda-recipes/issues/568#issuecomment-244636840","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/omnia-md/conda-recipes/issues/568","id":244636840,"user":{"login":"jchodera","id":3656088,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3656088?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera","html_url":"https://github.com/jchodera","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-05T00:15:14Z","updated_at":"2016-09-05T00:15:14Z","body":"Awesome! Thanks for the report!\r\n\r\nAny insight into how this might work for a package that depended on `openmm`? Is there some way to include the current `omnia` channel for pulling in dependencies? Would we just be migrating packages over to `conda-forge` instead of `omnia` if we started to move them there?\r\n\r\nLooking forward to giving this a try...\r\n\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jchodera"}}