{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Test-More/Test2-Suite/issues/73","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Test-More/Test2-Suite","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Test-More/Test2-Suite/issues/73/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Test-More/Test2-Suite/issues/73/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Test-More/Test2-Suite/issues/73/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Test-More/Test2-Suite/issues/73","id":175302157,"number":73,"title":"Create a check \"nonblank\"","user":{"login":"petdance","id":41100,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/41100?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance","html_url":"https://github.com/petdance","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Test-More/Test2-Suite/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":56,"created_at":"2016-09-06T17:17:36Z","updated_at":"2016-09-11T23:48:04Z","closed_at":null,"body":"In the old system, I have many tests that are of the form\r\n\r\n    is_nonblank( $foo->{name} );\r\n\r\nwhich is effectively\r\n\r\n    ok( !ref($foo->{name}) && length($foo->{name}) > 0 );\r\n\r\nAnd we should be able to do\r\n\r\n    is( $foo, hash { field name => nonblank } );"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Test-More/Test2-Suite/issues/comments/246213007","html_url":"https://github.com/Test-More/Test2-Suite/issues/73#issuecomment-246213007","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Test-More/Test2-Suite/issues/73","id":246213007,"user":{"login":"exodist","id":73914,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/73914?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/exodist","html_url":"https://github.com/exodist","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/exodist/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/exodist/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/exodist/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/exodist/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/exodist/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/exodist/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/exodist/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/exodist/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/exodist/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-11T23:48:04Z","updated_at":"2016-09-11T23:48:04Z","body":"I feel like this thread is getting crazy. @rjbs I don't think anyone is proposing what you are against, though the wording @petdance used does seem to imply that way.\n\nThe only thing being proposed is that plain refs without string overloading, ie 'hash(1244)' is almost never what you want. By that a string check on the left that only cares that it is given a string (but does not care what is in it) should not pass if it gets a ref that has no string overloading. in this case you can still do the uncommon case of actually wanting 'hash(1234)' by quoting thr thing on the left."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"exodist"}}