{"push_id":1227138396,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"c748ba6c121027d3be73c907dab604e72d82cb5b","before":"5a2406bf0acf8477c22c67c71247aeaa75a791ba","commits":[{"sha":"11f03cd8b5f996d27bf5b92209dd91f3f71ee6ea","author":{"name":"Joe Groff","email":"68122447f8f73fd0fe68c1577287346172ffeb70@apple.com"},"message":"Sema: Don't try bridged classes as default literal types.\n\nOne last bit of SE-0072. We shouldn't fall back to bridged classes in the absence of type context for literals anymore. By itself, this kind of hoses the use of literals with NS types, but I think we can get most of the QoI back with overlay changes I plan to propose following this.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gottesmm/swift/commits/11f03cd8b5f996d27bf5b92209dd91f3f71ee6ea"},{"sha":"c748ba6c121027d3be73c907dab604e72d82cb5b","author":{"name":"Joe Groff","email":"541c1504d562d72a1888cef14a75f8c40b631a03@gmail.com"},"message":"Merge pull request #3870 from jckarter/no-bridged-default-literal-types\n\nSema: Don't try bridged classes as default literal types.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/gottesmm/swift/commits/c748ba6c121027d3be73c907dab604e72d82cb5b"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"gottesmm"}}