{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/4897","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/4897/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/4897/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/4897/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/4897","id":108641245,"number":4897,"title":"Make camelus mention package owner","user":{"login":"whitequark","id":54771,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54771?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/whitequark","html_url":"https://github.com/whitequark","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whitequark/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whitequark/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whitequark/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whitequark/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whitequark/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whitequark/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whitequark/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whitequark/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whitequark/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2015-09-28T11:42:58Z","updated_at":"2016-03-28T02:27:59Z","closed_at":null,"body":"To avoid the sad situation with https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/pull/4896, I think @camelus should @-mention every GitHub username included in the `dev-repo` field of the packages that have been changed.\r\n\r\nAnd I also think it is reasonable that, unless the package was broken in an obvious way or there is no functional change, maintainers should wait a day or two before merging to give the package maintainer a chance to respond."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/comments/202197029","html_url":"https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/4897#issuecomment-202197029","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/4897","id":202197029,"user":{"login":"rgrinberg","id":139003,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/139003?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgrinberg","html_url":"https://github.com/rgrinberg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgrinberg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgrinberg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgrinberg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgrinberg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgrinberg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgrinberg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgrinberg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgrinberg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rgrinberg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-28T02:27:59Z","updated_at":"2016-03-28T02:27:59Z","body":"@samoht But we already have a maintainer email field in the opam file? Why can't we just extend it to cover github usernames (among other things).\r\n\r\nMy own 2 cents: I'm not a fan of scattering this information on the file system."}}