{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pi-hole/pi-hole/issues/660","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pi-hole/pi-hole","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pi-hole/pi-hole/issues/660/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pi-hole/pi-hole/issues/660/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pi-hole/pi-hole/issues/660/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/issues/660","id":174914026,"number":660,"title":"Web interface disabled after 2.9 update (RPI)","user":{"login":"Berrygoodly","id":21976090,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/21976090?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Berrygoodly","html_url":"https://github.com/Berrygoodly","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Berrygoodly/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Berrygoodly/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Berrygoodly/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Berrygoodly/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Berrygoodly/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Berrygoodly/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Berrygoodly/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Berrygoodly/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Berrygoodly/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":14,"created_at":"2016-09-03T19:46:57Z","updated_at":"2016-09-04T01:09:04Z","closed_at":null,"body":"##### Expected Behaviour\r\nAdmin web page should appear as usual\r\n\r\n##### Actual Behaviour:\r\nLighttpd fails to start due to running as \"lighttpd\" user instead of \"www-data\". Error is solved by manual configuration change but is apparently introduced (and reintroduced) by the Pi hole installer pulling from the RedHat / Centos branch instead of Debian. \r\n\r\n##### Steps to reproduce this issue:\r\nInstall PiHole 2.9 on a Raspian Raspberry Pi 3 that is already running 2.8\r\n\r\nAfter upgrade, web admin page will not load as the lighttpd server will fail to run. \r\n\r\nInstalling again, or installing as upgrade/new install makes no difference. \r\n\r\n<bountysource-plugin>\r\n---\r\nWant to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/37551147-web-interface-disabled-after-2-9-update-rpi?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F3011939&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F3011939&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).\r\n</bountysource-plugin>"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pi-hole/pi-hole/issues/comments/244578460","html_url":"https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/issues/660#issuecomment-244578460","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pi-hole/pi-hole/issues/660","id":244578460,"user":{"login":"bcambl","id":5565939,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5565939?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcambl","html_url":"https://github.com/bcambl","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcambl/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcambl/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcambl/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcambl/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcambl/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcambl/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcambl/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcambl/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bcambl/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-04T01:09:03Z","updated_at":"2016-09-04T01:09:03Z","body":"I was going to do a PR to flip the apt/rpm checks in the OS compatability section. I would bet the majority of users will be on apt based distros. If we flipped the check then we wouldn't need to worry about the 'rpm installed on debian' edge case. I doubt any actual rpm based distros would have apt installed. \r\nSimple PR if anyone wants to beat me to it!  "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"bcambl"}}