{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cloudRoutine/issueTestRepo/issues/177","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cloudRoutine/issueTestRepo","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cloudRoutine/issueTestRepo/issues/177/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cloudRoutine/issueTestRepo/issues/177/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cloudRoutine/issueTestRepo/issues/177/events","html_url":"https://github.com/cloudRoutine/issueTestRepo/issues/177","id":182449912,"number":177,"title":"Provided Record Types","user":{"login":"cloudRoutine","id":680051,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/680051?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cloudRoutine","html_url":"https://github.com/cloudRoutine","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cloudRoutine/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cloudRoutine/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cloudRoutine/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cloudRoutine/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cloudRoutine/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cloudRoutine/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cloudRoutine/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cloudRoutine/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cloudRoutine/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cloudRoutine/issueTestRepo/labels/declined","name":"declined","color":"171819"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-10-12T06:59:39Z","updated_at":"2016-10-12T10:11:33Z","closed_at":"2016-10-12T10:11:33Z","body":"# Idea 5664634: Provided Record Types #\n\n**Status : declined**  \n**Submitted by Anonymous on 3/21/2014 12:00:00 AM**  \n**1 votes**\n\nThe included type providers should have the option of emitting F# record types rather than class types.\r\nFor example, when reading and writing SQL data, your F# code has to either deal with classes, which don't have the nice benefits of F# records (immutability, copy/update syntax, code that is easier to reason about, fewer bugs, etc.), or you have to map your classes to corresponding F# records, do your processing, and then convert back to classes.\r\nHaving the option to provide F# record types would really bring the power of the language closer to the data.\r\n(see http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studio/suggestions/5576101-the-included-type-providers-should-have-the-option, moved from there to here per Visual Studio Team)\n\n\n\n## Response \n** by fslang-admin on 3/27/2014 12:00:00 AM **\n\nThis is covered by existing suggestion [/archive/suggestion-5663267-allow-to-generate-dus-and-records-in-type-provider](/archive/suggestion-5663267-allow-to-generate-dus-and-records-in-type-provider.md)\r\nDeclining to allow votes to be recycled\n[Archived Uservoice Comments](../tree/master/archive/suggestion-5664634-provided-record-types.md#comments)\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"cloudRoutine"}}