{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/codingwell/scala-guice/issues/55","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/codingwell/scala-guice","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/codingwell/scala-guice/issues/55/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/codingwell/scala-guice/issues/55/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/codingwell/scala-guice/issues/55/events","html_url":"https://github.com/codingwell/scala-guice/issues/55","id":157094479,"number":55,"title":"2.12-ification","user":{"login":"mosesn","id":156562,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/156562?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mosesn","html_url":"https://github.com/mosesn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mosesn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mosesn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mosesn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mosesn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mosesn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mosesn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mosesn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mosesn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mosesn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2016-05-26T22:38:24Z","updated_at":"2016-07-31T18:31:17Z","closed_at":null,"body":"We should start publishing against 2.12.0-M4 if possible, since it looks like 2.12.0 final is around the corner."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/codingwell/scala-guice/issues/comments/236448251","html_url":"https://github.com/codingwell/scala-guice/issues/55#issuecomment-236448251","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/codingwell/scala-guice/issues/55","id":236448251,"user":{"login":"tsuckow","id":262439,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/262439?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tsuckow","html_url":"https://github.com/tsuckow","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tsuckow/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tsuckow/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tsuckow/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tsuckow/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tsuckow/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tsuckow/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tsuckow/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tsuckow/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tsuckow/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-31T18:31:17Z","updated_at":"2016-07-31T18:31:17Z","body":"If you could test on a version you do use 2.10 or 2.11 that would still be awesome. I made a few minor tweaks for 2.12. It passes all the tests but that isn't conclusive.\r\n\r\nThose tweaks were the change I made for error messages. I am not sure it actually worked correctly in 4.0.1 and before, If you made a binding have a runtime problem, it should include the line of the binding in your code. Things like duplicate bindings I think would work for the test. There may be some spots where we could extend our tests to verify more of the possible runtime errors.\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"tsuckow"}}