{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/issues/841","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/issues/841/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/issues/841/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/issues/841/events","html_url":"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/issues/841","id":159689279,"number":841,"title":"Allow setting of multiple non-conflicting policies of same priority on queues/exchanges","user":{"login":"Ayanda-D","id":12154951,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12154951?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ayanda-D","html_url":"https://github.com/Ayanda-D","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ayanda-D/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ayanda-D/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ayanda-D/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ayanda-D/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ayanda-D/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ayanda-D/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ayanda-D/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ayanda-D/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Ayanda-D/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/labels/effort-medium","name":"effort-medium","color":"5080b8"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"009800"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/labels/no-decision","name":"no-decision","color":"e6e6e6"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":{"login":"michaelklishin","id":1090,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1090?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin","html_url":"https://github.com/michaelklishin","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"assignees":[{"login":"michaelklishin","id":1090,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1090?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin","html_url":"https://github.com/michaelklishin","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false}],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-06-10T18:01:25Z","updated_at":"2016-09-06T10:55:47Z","closed_at":"2016-09-06T10:55:47Z","body":"Unless this is by design, I think when, for example, the following non-conflicting policies are defined, declaring queues should result in all of these being applied;\r\n\r\n`rabbitmqctl set_policy ha-2-policy \".*\" '{\"ha-mode\":\"exactly\",\"ha-params\":2,\"ha-sync-mode\":\"automatic\"}' --apply-to queues --priority 0`\r\n\r\n`rabbitmqctl set_policy lazy-policy \".*\" '{\"queue-mode\":\"lazy\"}' --apply-to queues --priority 0`\r\n\r\n`rabbitmqctl set_policy qml-policy  \".*\" '{\"queue-master-locator\":\"random\"}' --apply-to queues --priority 0`\r\n\r\nand only when policies are of the same **type** and **priority** should they be applied non-deterministically. Currently, in such a case, only a single policy is applied non-deterministically, regardless of there not being any possible conflicts amongst defined policies. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/issues/comments/244916614","html_url":"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/issues/841#issuecomment-244916614","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/issues/841","id":244916614,"user":{"login":"michaelklishin","id":1090,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1090?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin","html_url":"https://github.com/michaelklishin","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/michaelklishin/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-06T10:55:46Z","updated_at":"2016-09-06T10:55:46Z","body":"Merging policies will be a significant breaking change. I am currently not convinced than doing anything beyond #930 is worth it. I suggest that we close it and wait for feedback from those who needed #930 the most."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"michaelklishin"}}