{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/beltoforion/muparserx/issues/75","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/beltoforion/muparserx","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/beltoforion/muparserx/issues/75/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/beltoforion/muparserx/issues/75/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/beltoforion/muparserx/issues/75/events","html_url":"https://github.com/beltoforion/muparserx/issues/75","id":172033650,"number":75,"title":"Big numbers support?","user":{"login":"arivera12","id":5600102,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5600102?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/arivera12","html_url":"https://github.com/arivera12","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arivera12/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arivera12/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arivera12/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arivera12/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arivera12/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arivera12/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arivera12/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arivera12/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arivera12/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/beltoforion/muparserx/labels/Wont%20fix","name":"Wont fix","color":"fbca04"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-08-19T00:58:53Z","updated_at":"2016-08-22T00:06:29Z","closed_at":"2016-08-21T19:33:31Z","body":"I am using this lib [http://www.hvks.com](http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html) which supports big numbers with exact precision is there anyway to implements this lib over MuParserX? All the parsers that I found over the internet are using primitives datatypes and this is a big limitation when using any of this parser to do scientific emulations, test and calculations."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/beltoforion/muparserx/issues/comments/241290986","html_url":"https://github.com/beltoforion/muparserx/issues/75#issuecomment-241290986","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/beltoforion/muparserx/issues/75","id":241290986,"user":{"login":"beltoforion","id":2202567,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2202567?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/beltoforion","html_url":"https://github.com/beltoforion","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/beltoforion/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/beltoforion/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/beltoforion/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/beltoforion/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/beltoforion/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/beltoforion/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/beltoforion/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/beltoforion/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/beltoforion/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-22T00:06:29Z","updated_at":"2016-08-22T00:06:29Z","body":"You can have a look at atmsp. It does work with arbitrary precision numbers. (https://sourceforge.net/projects/atmsp/)\r\n\r\nIf you like to create something new anyway feel free to submit your parser to the math parser benchmark project (https://github.com/ArashPartow/math-parser-benchmark-project)\r\n\r\nKind Regards,\r\nIngo"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"beltoforion"}}