{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/specfem3d/issues/781","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/specfem3d","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/specfem3d/issues/781/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/specfem3d/issues/781/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/specfem3d/issues/781/events","html_url":"https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem3d/issues/781","id":164881397,"number":781,"title":"the receiver locating process is not always accurate when SU_FORMAT and topography are both on","user":{"login":"komatits","id":5817129,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5817129?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/komatits","html_url":"https://github.com/komatits","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/komatits/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/komatits/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/komatits/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/komatits/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/komatits/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/komatits/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/komatits/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/komatits/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/komatits/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-07-11T16:39:46Z","updated_at":"2016-07-11T16:39:46Z","closed_at":null,"body":"From Chang-Hua Zhang @specfem3d-zhang-ksu:\r\n\r\nI have found that the SU_FORMAT receiver locating method is not accurate for some receivers if receivers are located on a topography surface. I have not figured out why."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"komatits"}}