{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/aspect/issues/1074","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/aspect","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/aspect/issues/1074/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/aspect/issues/1074/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/aspect/issues/1074/events","html_url":"https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/pull/1074","id":163318019,"number":1074,"title":"Adjust adiabatic conditions to allow for backward advection","user":{"login":"jaustermann","id":7633875,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7633875?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaustermann","html_url":"https://github.com/jaustermann","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaustermann/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaustermann/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaustermann/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaustermann/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaustermann/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaustermann/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaustermann/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaustermann/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaustermann/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-07-01T04:36:50Z","updated_at":"2016-07-03T19:22:09Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/aspect/pulls/1074","html_url":"https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/pull/1074","diff_url":"https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/pull/1074.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/pull/1074.patch"},"body":"This change serves to allow inputting negative gravity for backward advection. I tested this change with the convection-box and the harmonic perturbation spherical slice and it produced the expected results (in the instantaneous case the velocity field is exactly opposite; in the time dependent case dense features rise for negative gravity). I can imagine that there are cases that I didn't account for and which will break the code ... the tester will tell!"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/aspect/issues/comments/230170411","html_url":"https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/pull/1074#issuecomment-230170411","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/geodynamics/aspect/issues/1074","id":230170411,"user":{"login":"tjhei","id":1531285,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1531285?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjhei","html_url":"https://github.com/tjhei","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjhei/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjhei/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjhei/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjhei/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjhei/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjhei/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjhei/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjhei/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjhei/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-03T19:22:09Z","updated_at":"2016-07-03T19:22:09Z","body":"> Should I look more into the burstedde test or is it okay if I apply the test diff patch and push it?\r\n\r\nThat is a special case because it is not a realistic gravity but something for a manufactured solution. Of course it should be set up in a way that the adiabatic conditions don't play a role. :-("}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"tjhei"}}