{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cta-observatory/pyhessio/issues/13","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cta-observatory/pyhessio","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cta-observatory/pyhessio/issues/13/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cta-observatory/pyhessio/issues/13/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cta-observatory/pyhessio/issues/13/events","html_url":"https://github.com/cta-observatory/pyhessio/issues/13","id":141640866,"number":13,"title":"Number of photoelectrons at each pixel","user":{"login":"watsonjj","id":17825673,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/17825673?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj","html_url":"https://github.com/watsonjj","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":9,"created_at":"2016-03-17T16:49:56Z","updated_at":"2016-03-25T12:12:49Z","closed_at":"2016-03-22T10:42:29Z","body":"Extract MCEvent.mc_pe_list[tel].pe_count[pix] into a mc-event object."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cta-observatory/pyhessio/issues/comments/201255890","html_url":"https://github.com/cta-observatory/pyhessio/issues/13#issuecomment-201255890","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cta-observatory/pyhessio/issues/13","id":201255890,"user":{"login":"watsonjj","id":17825673,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/17825673?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj","html_url":"https://github.com/watsonjj","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/watsonjj/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-25T12:12:49Z","updated_at":"2016-03-25T12:12:49Z","body":"Hi Karl, no it is different. It is what you should get if your charge extraction and calibration was perfect. I believe it is the true number of photoelectrons after the photocathode for that event in the simulation. "}}