{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bartdag/py4j/issues/159","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bartdag/py4j","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bartdag/py4j/issues/159/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bartdag/py4j/issues/159/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bartdag/py4j/issues/159/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bartdag/py4j/issues/159","id":66683923,"number":159,"title":"Use binary protocol for better performance","user":{"login":"davies","id":40902,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/40902?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/davies","html_url":"https://github.com/davies","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davies/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davies/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davies/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davies/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davies/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davies/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davies/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davies/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/davies/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":14,"created_at":"2015-04-06T19:22:21Z","updated_at":"2016-05-02T13:14:19Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Currently, the text protocol is very slow for large objects, we can have optional binary protocol for better performance. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bartdag/py4j/issues/comments/216231252","html_url":"https://github.com/bartdag/py4j/issues/159#issuecomment-216231252","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bartdag/py4j/issues/159","id":216231252,"user":{"login":"kaytwo","id":587187,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/587187?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kaytwo","html_url":"https://github.com/kaytwo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kaytwo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kaytwo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kaytwo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kaytwo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kaytwo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kaytwo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kaytwo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kaytwo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kaytwo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-05-02T13:14:19Z","updated_at":"2016-05-02T13:14:19Z","body":"#201 is the likely culprit for this performance degradation, or at least a large chunk of it. @davies, can you see whether py4j built from master improves the performance you were seeing?"}}