{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ponylang/rfcs/issues/4","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ponylang/rfcs","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ponylang/rfcs/issues/4/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ponylang/rfcs/issues/4/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ponylang/rfcs/issues/4/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ponylang/rfcs/pull/4","id":157558902,"number":4,"title":"Sugar for method chaining","user":{"login":"malthe","id":26405,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/26405?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/malthe","html_url":"https://github.com/malthe","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malthe/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malthe/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malthe/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malthe/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malthe/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malthe/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malthe/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malthe/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/malthe/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":41,"created_at":"2016-05-30T21:36:14Z","updated_at":"2016-10-26T21:45:04Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ponylang/rfcs/pulls/4","html_url":"https://github.com/ponylang/rfcs/pull/4","diff_url":"https://github.com/ponylang/rfcs/pull/4.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/ponylang/rfcs/pull/4.patch"},"body":"Lots of APIs support method chaining, but in Pony (and most languages) this needs explicit support in the class implementation. This is a proposal to introduce a syntax sugar for invoking a method with no return value and have the object returned."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ponylang/rfcs/issues/comments/256486609","html_url":"https://github.com/ponylang/rfcs/pull/4#issuecomment-256486609","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ponylang/rfcs/issues/4","id":256486609,"user":{"login":"Praetonus","id":5193706,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5193706?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Praetonus","html_url":"https://github.com/Praetonus","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Praetonus/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Praetonus/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Praetonus/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Praetonus/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Praetonus/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Praetonus/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Praetonus/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Praetonus/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Praetonus/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-26T21:45:04Z","updated_at":"2016-10-26T21:45:04Z","body":"> require that the method has a return value of `None`\r\n\r\nI don't see any compelling reason to do that. What kind of bugs do you have in mind?\r\n\r\n> changing the semantics of behaviors such that they don't return themselves\r\n\r\nI'd second that, but I think it's outside of the scope of this RFC."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"Praetonus"}}