{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clld/concepticon-data/issues/146","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clld/concepticon-data","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clld/concepticon-data/issues/146/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clld/concepticon-data/issues/146/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clld/concepticon-data/issues/146/events","html_url":"https://github.com/clld/concepticon-data/issues/146","id":157919399,"number":146,"title":"Should we expand our Concepticon by adding Concept Sets for morphological categories?","user":{"login":"LinguList","id":2916210,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2916210?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/LinguList","html_url":"https://github.com/LinguList","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LinguList/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LinguList/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LinguList/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LinguList/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LinguList/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LinguList/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LinguList/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LinguList/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LinguList/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clld/concepticon-data/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clld/concepticon-data/labels/representation","name":"representation","color":"d93f0b"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-06-01T14:21:57Z","updated_at":"2016-06-01T14:32:37Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@BettinaKlimek approached me and mentioned she could offer many (250+) definitions and identifiers for morphological categories (categories which are expressed morphologically), along with relations (like \"Plural\", \"Dual\", etc.).\r\n\r\nThe individual usefulness of having some concept sets in this way is clear, but since morphological categories are on the borderline between abstract grammatical categories and some lexemes in specific languages (think of some of our NAN entries, which are grammatical stuff), adding morphological categories would be a question of the general direction: We could offer the concepticon also as a solution to handle grammatical categories in general (I know that people are discussing that it would be useful for them as well to have something similar to our concepticon for their typological data), we could just say we restrict it only to lexemes, or we could say we restrict it to meanings expressed on words (morphology + proper meanings).\r\n\r\nThat there is a desideratum in having @BettinaKlimek 's data in some Concepticon-like form (or in the Concepticon itself) is out of question I guess."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clld/concepticon-data/issues/comments/223011317","html_url":"https://github.com/clld/concepticon-data/issues/146#issuecomment-223011317","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clld/concepticon-data/issues/146","id":223011317,"user":{"login":"cysouw","id":1079786,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1079786?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cysouw","html_url":"https://github.com/cysouw","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cysouw/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cysouw/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cysouw/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cysouw/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cysouw/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cysouw/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cysouw/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cysouw/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cysouw/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-06-01T14:32:37Z","updated_at":"2016-06-01T14:32:37Z","body":"well, if we start with grammatical concepts, then something like GOLD is the place to start (though even this project is highly problematic). It gives full IDs and nice definitions, at least, e.g. http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AbessiveCase\n\nHowever, I would try to stay in the “lexical” domain for the concepticon. The division between lexicon and grammar is moot of course, but the problems within the grammatical domain multiply rapidly."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"cysouw"}}