{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CredentialTransparencyInitiative/vocabularies/issues/69","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CredentialTransparencyInitiative/vocabularies","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CredentialTransparencyInitiative/vocabularies/issues/69/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CredentialTransparencyInitiative/vocabularies/issues/69/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/CredentialTransparencyInitiative/vocabularies/issues/69/events","html_url":"https://github.com/CredentialTransparencyInitiative/vocabularies/issues/69","id":178367825,"number":69,"title":"Cost Profile: aggregateCost vs costType of Aggregated Costs","user":{"login":"siuc-nate","id":21346519,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/21346519?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/siuc-nate","html_url":"https://github.com/siuc-nate","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/siuc-nate/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/siuc-nate/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/siuc-nate/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/siuc-nate/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/siuc-nate/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/siuc-nate/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/siuc-nate/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/siuc-nate/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/siuc-nate/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-09-21T14:43:22Z","updated_at":"2016-09-28T12:36:21Z","closed_at":"2016-09-28T12:36:21Z","body":"Currently Cost Profile has an \"aggregateCost\" property. Would it not be better to have a costType enumeration value of \"aggregatedCosts\"?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"stuartasutton"}}