{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43/events","html_url":"https://github.com/docker-library/buildpack-deps/issues/43","id":131845272,"number":43,"title":"Consider GraphicsMagick instead of ImageMagick?","user":{"login":"mgcrea","id":108273,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/108273?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea","html_url":"https://github.com/mgcrea","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mgcrea/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-02-06T11:11:09Z","updated_at":"2016-02-06T11:11:09Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I've used `graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat` instead of `imagemagick` in my images, as it seems to be the goto option these days. GraphicsMagick is a fork is concentrating on better performance and stability, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GraphicsMagick."}}