{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/ReScience-submission/issues/16","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/ReScience-submission","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/ReScience-submission/issues/16/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/ReScience-submission/issues/16/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/ReScience-submission/issues/16/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ReScience/ReScience-submission/issues/16","id":149280272,"number":16,"title":"Re-implementation of open source methods in another language","user":{"login":"arokem","id":118582,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/118582?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/arokem","html_url":"https://github.com/arokem","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arokem/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arokem/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arokem/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arokem/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arokem/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arokem/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arokem/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arokem/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arokem/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":9,"created_at":"2016-04-18T21:41:36Z","updated_at":"2016-04-20T16:04:22Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Dear Rescience editors. In the course of our work, we have created a Python implementation of a method that was previously available as open-source R code. Is this implementation within the scope of Rescience? Thanks! cc:@kpolimis, @bhazelton"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/ReScience-submission/issues/comments/212491219","html_url":"https://github.com/ReScience/ReScience-submission/issues/16#issuecomment-212491219","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/ReScience-submission/issues/16","id":212491219,"user":{"login":"FedericoV","id":630134,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/630134?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/FedericoV","html_url":"https://github.com/FedericoV","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FedericoV/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FedericoV/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FedericoV/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FedericoV/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FedericoV/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FedericoV/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FedericoV/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FedericoV/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/FedericoV/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-04-20T16:04:22Z","updated_at":"2016-04-20T16:04:22Z","body":"I am not a lawyer, but I believe that if you look at GPL code while you\nimplement the Python code, it counts as derivative.\n\nOn Wed, 20 Apr 2016 at 18:02 Nicolas P. Rougier <notifications@github.com>\nwrote:\n\n> Replication is not a derivative work for me.\n>\n> —\n> You are receiving this because you commented.\n>\n>\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n> <https://github.com/ReScience/ReScience-submission/issues/16#issuecomment-212490668>\n>\n"}}