{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KSP-RO/TestFlight/issues/122","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KSP-RO/TestFlight","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KSP-RO/TestFlight/issues/122/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KSP-RO/TestFlight/issues/122/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KSP-RO/TestFlight/issues/122/events","html_url":"https://github.com/KSP-RO/TestFlight/issues/122","id":139121292,"number":122,"title":"core > disable failure > multiple of the failure module","user":{"login":"anxcon","id":10319883,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10319883?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon","html_url":"https://github.com/anxcon","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-03-07T23:05:07Z","updated_at":"2016-03-08T01:26:08Z","closed_at":null,"body":"it disables a failure by failure name, this instead should be some ID for the module, to not disable other potential failures of the same name on the part"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KSP-RO/TestFlight/issues/comments/193544473","html_url":"https://github.com/KSP-RO/TestFlight/issues/122#issuecomment-193544473","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KSP-RO/TestFlight/issues/122","id":193544473,"user":{"login":"anxcon","id":10319883,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10319883?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon","html_url":"https://github.com/anxcon","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/anxcon/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-08T01:26:08Z","updated_at":"2016-03-08T01:26:08Z","body":"some parts have multiple ModuleGimbal for example for engines with multiple bells, in such cases you would only want to break 1 gimbal not all, so multiple modules 1 per gimbal transform\r\n\r\nor as IRC had earlier, a part with 4x ModuleScienceExperiment - so 4 failures, each only enabled when its MSE module is operating\r\n\r\nthe main use to this, is to prevent an issue with an idea i had, during failure module load, if the required modules arent around etc, disable failure, so core doesnt try to trigger it"}}