{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jchadwick/EssentialTypeScriptBook/issues/6","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jchadwick/EssentialTypeScriptBook","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jchadwick/EssentialTypeScriptBook/issues/6/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jchadwick/EssentialTypeScriptBook/issues/6/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jchadwick/EssentialTypeScriptBook/issues/6/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jchadwick/EssentialTypeScriptBook/issues/6","id":159833969,"number":6,"title":"tip worth mentioning getters / setters","user":{"login":"robin-raymond","id":2962646,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2962646?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/robin-raymond","html_url":"https://github.com/robin-raymond","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/robin-raymond/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/robin-raymond/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/robin-raymond/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/robin-raymond/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/robin-raymond/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/robin-raymond/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/robin-raymond/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/robin-raymond/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/robin-raymond/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-06-12T15:52:33Z","updated_at":"2016-06-12T15:52:33Z","closed_at":null,"body":"https://github.com/jchadwick/EssentialTypeScriptBook/blob/master/manuscript/05.Classes.md\r\n\r\n> At this point I want to point out that, even though I've been calling them \"getter and setter properties\" like they have to go together, this code is actually perfectly legitimate -- you don't need to define a getter AND a setter for a property - you can implement either one or both of them, depending on what you're trying to accomplish.\r\n\r\nI believe getters and setters in C# do not allow a setter exclusively without first defining a getter. I think that is worth mentioning here as a note that it is allowed in TS (assuming it is...);\r\n\r\nAlso when I was searching the legality I read some stuff about odd property inheritance not being o\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"robin-raymond"}}