{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/turbopape/scheje/issues/5","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/turbopape/scheje","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/turbopape/scheje/issues/5/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/turbopape/scheje/issues/5/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/turbopape/scheje/issues/5/events","html_url":"https://github.com/turbopape/scheje/issues/5","id":142086099,"number":5,"title":"Implement Continuations","user":{"login":"turbopape","id":2779167,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2779167?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/turbopape","html_url":"https://github.com/turbopape","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turbopape/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turbopape/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turbopape/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turbopape/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turbopape/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turbopape/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turbopape/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turbopape/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/turbopape/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-03-19T17:52:55Z","updated_at":"2016-03-19T17:52:55Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Maybe the most important thing missing so Scheje is considered as a proper Scheme.\r\n\r\nWe might be able to achieve this if we rework the approach: not relying on a one-to-one Clojure structures translation, but parsing code, and using Clojure as an implementation language.\r\nVersion 0.3.XX ??"}}