{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-private-fields/issues/14","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-private-fields","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-private-fields/issues/14/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-private-fields/issues/14/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-private-fields/issues/14/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/proposal-private-fields/issues/14","id":114516425,"number":14,"title":"Why not use the \"private\" keyword, like Java or C#?","user":{"login":"melanke","id":1337983,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1337983?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/melanke","html_url":"https://github.com/melanke","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melanke/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melanke/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melanke/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melanke/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melanke/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melanke/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melanke/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melanke/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/melanke/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":193,"created_at":"2015-11-02T03:14:48Z","updated_at":"2016-08-31T15:31:16Z","closed_at":null,"body":""},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-private-fields/issues/comments/243802625","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/proposal-private-fields/issues/14#issuecomment-243802625","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-private-fields/issues/14","id":243802625,"user":{"login":"littledan","id":189835,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/189835?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan","html_url":"https://github.com/littledan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/littledan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-31T15:31:16Z","updated_at":"2016-08-31T15:31:16Z","body":"@wycats has given strong arguments for \"this-less\" accessor syntax in the past in committee--maybe he can represent that point of view here. The short of it is, if we give more friendly syntax for private state, then it will encourage people to use it, which could be a good thing if we think private state is a good thing (I do!). Otherwise, private state risks being uglier than ordinary properties and not used very much."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"littledan"}}