{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/profi200/Project_CTR/issues/26","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/profi200/Project_CTR","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/profi200/Project_CTR/issues/26/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/profi200/Project_CTR/issues/26/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/profi200/Project_CTR/issues/26/events","html_url":"https://github.com/profi200/Project_CTR/issues/26","id":133635597,"number":26,"title":"SRL command is broken (part 2) ...","user":{"login":"ApacheThunder","id":11767416,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11767416?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ApacheThunder","html_url":"https://github.com/ApacheThunder","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ApacheThunder/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ApacheThunder/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ApacheThunder/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ApacheThunder/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ApacheThunder/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ApacheThunder/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ApacheThunder/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ApacheThunder/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ApacheThunder/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":11,"created_at":"2016-02-15T06:42:51Z","updated_at":"2016-02-19T02:28:37Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This seems to be an issue since build 0.13 at the least (have not tested older builds). A recent commit finally fixed the issue with it wanting an RSF to build SRL CIAs. This issue is unrelated that issue.\r\n\r\nThe good ol invalid SRL error returns:\r\n\r\n\"[CIA ERROR] Invalid TWL SRL File\"\r\n\r\nIt does this with all SRLs I've tried to give it. Even retail game SRLs."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/profi200/Project_CTR/issues/comments/186019692","html_url":"https://github.com/profi200/Project_CTR/issues/26#issuecomment-186019692","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/profi200/Project_CTR/issues/26","id":186019692,"user":{"login":"jakcron","id":9269962,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9269962?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakcron","html_url":"https://github.com/jakcron","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakcron/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakcron/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakcron/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakcron/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakcron/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakcron/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakcron/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakcron/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jakcron/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-19T02:28:37Z","updated_at":"2016-02-19T02:28:37Z","body":"Ah, if it's hardcoded into twlfirm that would explain why the rsa modulus\nin the itcm is unused.\n\nOn Friday, 19 February 2016, Steven Smith <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n\n> FWIW, dev units definitely at least use their own RSA signing data for TWL\n> applications, verified through TWL_FIRM disassembly. (the code for it is\n> still there, but only used when UNITINFO is set to 1, for dev)\n>\n> —\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n> <https://github.com/profi200/Project_CTR/issues/26#issuecomment-185946325>\n> .\n>\n"}}