{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dfm/peerless/issues/7","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dfm/peerless","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dfm/peerless/issues/7/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dfm/peerless/issues/7/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dfm/peerless/issues/7/events","html_url":"https://github.com/dfm/peerless/issues/7","id":165148567,"number":7,"title":"simulated observed planet population is low","user":{"login":"timothydmorton","id":1895387,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1895387?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/timothydmorton","html_url":"https://github.com/timothydmorton","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timothydmorton/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timothydmorton/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timothydmorton/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timothydmorton/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timothydmorton/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timothydmorton/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timothydmorton/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timothydmorton/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timothydmorton/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":17,"created_at":"2016-07-12T18:33:11Z","updated_at":"2016-07-14T18:54:36Z","closed_at":"2016-07-14T18:54:36Z","body":"So I'm trying to simulate the observed population of planets according to your inferred occurrence rate, and I'm coming up short.  Just wanted to report, since in order for me to trust my simulated population of binaries I should be able to generate ~30 detected planets given the occurrence given in the paper.  With an input population taken as in Table 5, the following is the number of detections I generate over 100 trials, both with a cut of SNR > 15 and without.\r\n\r\n![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1895387/16778626/a468cc82-4823-11e6-8c42-b5a8cf639a25.png)\r\n\r\nThis is a substantial factor smaller than I'd need it to be for comfort.  I'll be investigating my simulations for problems, but just wanted to let you know.  I've pushed my updated [predictions notebook](https://github.com/dfm/peerless/blob/master/prediction/prediction.ipynb).\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"timothydmorton"}}