{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/innoq/SCS/issues/17","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/innoq/SCS","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/innoq/SCS/issues/17/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/innoq/SCS/issues/17/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/innoq/SCS/issues/17/events","html_url":"https://github.com/innoq/SCS/issues/17","id":150854920,"number":17,"title":"\"SCS vs. Microservices\" should not mix microservices with SCSs","user":{"login":"magro","id":64285,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/64285?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/magro","html_url":"https://github.com/magro","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magro/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magro/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magro/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magro/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magro/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magro/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magro/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magro/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/magro/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-04-25T13:17:13Z","updated_at":"2016-04-25T13:17:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The page [SCS vs. Microservices](http://scs-architecture.org/vs-ms.html) says \"Of course it is possible to split an SCS even further so it consists of microservices\". Because it's often said that microservices have their own database in order to be decoupled from other services (see e.g. [Pattern: Microservices Architecture](http://microservices.io/patterns/microservices.html)) I'd try to avoid the usage of the term \"microservices\" and rather prefer \"subsystems\" or \"processes\". This is just to start the discussion about terminology, which was also already questioned on the discussions page."}}