{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftrotter/OSE/issues/2","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftrotter/OSE","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftrotter/OSE/issues/2/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftrotter/OSE/issues/2/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftrotter/OSE/issues/2/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ftrotter/OSE/issues/2","id":17317011,"number":2,"title":"Do we need a new name?","user":{"login":"ftrotter","id":83133,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/83133?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftrotter","html_url":"https://github.com/ftrotter","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftrotter/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftrotter/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftrotter/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftrotter/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftrotter/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftrotter/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftrotter/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftrotter/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ftrotter/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2013-07-28T20:46:04Z","updated_at":"2016-09-13T20:34:31Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Monty has an identical concept called \"Business Source\".\r\n\r\nMy name is good because its clear how it works, and references Open Source\r\n\r\nHis name is good because it emphasises the whole reason that the license exists which is to make viable businesses.\r\n\r\nI think a name change is in order that does both. Of course we get a fun acroymn, if we merge the names this way:\r\n\r\nBusiness\r\nOpen \r\nSource\r\nSomeday \r\n\r\nIf someone else has a name that they would be willing to contribute (entirely) to this project.. please list it below... otherwise we will go with BOSS.\r\n\r\n-FT\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftrotter/OSE/issues/comments/246814859","html_url":"https://github.com/ftrotter/OSE/issues/2#issuecomment-246814859","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ftrotter/OSE/issues/2","id":246814859,"user":{"login":"indolering","id":44454,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/44454?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/indolering","html_url":"https://github.com/indolering","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/indolering/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/indolering/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/indolering/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/indolering/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/indolering/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/indolering/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/indolering/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/indolering/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/indolering/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-13T20:34:31Z","updated_at":"2016-09-13T20:34:31Z","body":"I think \"eventually\" and \"someday\" is really poor framing.  Furthermore, what if you are going from a strong copyleft to a weak copy left license?  Say AGPLv3 to Apache or from a Creative Commons non-commercial ([BY-NC-SA](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode)) to [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode) (public domain)?\r\n\r\nI think framing it as an evolution, metamorphosis, or incubation would be much better.  Besides, Open Source Evolution wouldn't require changing your acronym!"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"indolering"}}