{"push_id":1267359761,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"2fbe7b1a87b7ffbde7cccd3ade5b93697ddb0391","before":"16ac28d61bdba7392f5ba73a6a37b9475553c7a9","commits":[{"sha":"d9a8533bcc5e838f6c1e0558b37ab46fe303b47c","author":{"name":"Mark D. Butala","email":"b49ebecf111773bdd1fd6da607ec0febb66ff129@illinois.edu"},"message":"Added an exception for a feature that is currently broken.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/butala/pyrsss/commits/d9a8533bcc5e838f6c1e0558b37ab46fe303b47c"},{"sha":"2fbe7b1a87b7ffbde7cccd3ade5b93697ddb0391","author":{"name":"Mark D. Butala","email":"b49ebecf111773bdd1fd6da607ec0febb66ff129@illinois.edu"},"message":"Complete retooling of all line-of-sight integration code.\n\nFunctionality / compatibility has been maintained (mostly, the only user\nsignificant facing change is that inputs are now PyPositions whereas\nbefore they were xyz ECEF [m]). The changes were made to generalize the\nconcept of slant integration and enable the use of this common machinery\nfor other uses.\n\nWe've also switched from fixed_quad to quad. Prior, fixed_quad seemed to\nprovide a more robust approach, but this was a mirage --- with\nfixed_quad, we were getting lucky and avoiding NaN regions that were\nresulting in the interpolated grids. Some tuning may be required to get\na good accuracy / performance trade-off when using quad.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/butala/pyrsss/commits/2fbe7b1a87b7ffbde7cccd3ade5b93697ddb0391"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"butala"}}