{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/msgpack/msgpack-cli/issues/194","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/msgpack/msgpack-cli","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/msgpack/msgpack-cli/issues/194/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/msgpack/msgpack-cli/issues/194/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/msgpack/msgpack-cli/issues/194/events","html_url":"https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-cli/issues/194","id":185617728,"number":194,"title":"Custom objects creation","user":{"login":"kovman","id":1448879,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1448879?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman","html_url":"https://github.com/kovman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-10-27T09:30:25Z","updated_at":"2016-11-02T10:08:25Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi,\n\nI have read, that private constructors are not available because of speed (reflection etc.). In my case, I have private constructors and factory, that can create any available object. Is there any way, how can I use my factory to create new object and work around missing default public constructor (or any public constructor at all)?\n\nthanks\nLubomir\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/msgpack/msgpack-cli/issues/comments/257822670","html_url":"https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-cli/issues/194#issuecomment-257822670","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/msgpack/msgpack-cli/issues/194","id":257822670,"user":{"login":"kovman","id":1448879,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1448879?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman","html_url":"https://github.com/kovman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-11-02T10:08:25Z","updated_at":"2016-11-02T10:08:25Z","body":"Hi,\r\n\r\nsorry for delay, I got stuck with some other issues...\r\n\r\nAnyway. I'm trying to use [DataContract] attributes with MsgPack serialization as implementing IPackable and IUnpackable would be implementation over hundreds (not kidding) of existing objects. We have project based over CSLA framework and I'm not able (I'm, source codes are available, but I don't want) to implement it over all framework.\r\n\r\nSerialization with such classes is driven by framework and it's created by framework and access rights to business object are check immediately (even after deserialization).\r\n\r\nthanks\r\nLubomir"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"kovman"}}