{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/blitzcode/lru-bounded-map/issues/1","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/blitzcode/lru-bounded-map","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/blitzcode/lru-bounded-map/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/blitzcode/lru-bounded-map/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/blitzcode/lru-bounded-map/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/blitzcode/lru-bounded-map/issues/1","id":166809762,"number":1,"title":"Did you try psqueues?","user":{"login":"qrilka","id":70110,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/70110?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/qrilka","html_url":"https://github.com/qrilka","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qrilka/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qrilka/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qrilka/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qrilka/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qrilka/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qrilka/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qrilka/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qrilka/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/qrilka/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-07-21T12:44:02Z","updated_at":"2016-07-22T09:13:32Z","closed_at":null,"body":"It appears to be more performant than `lrucache` - I hope I could get some time creating a PR with psqueues-based cache in it, but probably you have done it already?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/blitzcode/lru-bounded-map/issues/comments/234494938","html_url":"https://github.com/blitzcode/lru-bounded-map/issues/1#issuecomment-234494938","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/blitzcode/lru-bounded-map/issues/1","id":234494938,"user":{"login":"blitzcode","id":2641674,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2641674?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/blitzcode","html_url":"https://github.com/blitzcode","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blitzcode/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blitzcode/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blitzcode/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blitzcode/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blitzcode/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blitzcode/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blitzcode/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blitzcode/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/blitzcode/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-22T09:13:31Z","updated_at":"2016-07-22T09:13:31Z","body":"`lrucache` uses pretty much the most naive implementation of this container without doing something silly, it's to be expected that `psqueues` are faster. I did not try `psqueues` myself. I vaguely (I might be wrong here) remember some interaction with the author of `psqueues` a while ago, I don't think it's actually faster than the fastest Trie implemented here. I personally also stopped looking into better solutions - for my use case the best solution I have here made it drop from the profile, no more improvement was needed."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"blitzcode"}}