{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Knagis/CommonMark.NET/issues/76","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Knagis/CommonMark.NET","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Knagis/CommonMark.NET/issues/76/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Knagis/CommonMark.NET/issues/76/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Knagis/CommonMark.NET/issues/76/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Knagis/CommonMark.NET/issues/76","id":131289459,"number":76,"title":"Add auto Github-style ID generation for headers","user":{"login":"jez9999","id":793830,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/793830?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999","html_url":"https://github.com/jez9999","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":18,"created_at":"2016-02-04T09:30:13Z","updated_at":"2016-02-06T13:56:22Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I've read issue #44 and the [discussion on CommonMark](http://talk.commonmark.org/t/feature-request-automatically-generated-ids-for-headers/115) about it.  In summary: they haven't decided what to do yet and there are numerous suggestions.\r\n\r\nIn the meantime, Github has been auto-generating IDs for their headers so that they can be linked to from a TOC for a long time now.  This isn't in the CommonMark standard, so I propose that we implement this as a CommonMarkAdditionalFeature.\r\n\r\n@Knagis Would it be OK as an additional feature called, say, GithubStyleHeaderIds?  If I implemented this would the pull request be accepted?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Knagis/CommonMark.NET/issues/comments/180768129","html_url":"https://github.com/Knagis/CommonMark.NET/issues/76#issuecomment-180768129","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Knagis/CommonMark.NET/issues/76","id":180768129,"user":{"login":"jez9999","id":793830,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/793830?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999","html_url":"https://github.com/jez9999","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jez9999/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-06T13:56:22Z","updated_at":"2016-02-06T13:56:22Z","body":"@Knagis Why is there an `HtmlFormatter` and an `HtmlFormatterSlim`? As far as I can tell, `HtmlFormatter` isn't being used for anything."}}