{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls/issues/49","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls/issues/49/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls/issues/49/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls/issues/49/events","html_url":"https://github.com/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls/issues/49","id":166312537,"number":49,"title":"Clarifying \"reliable transports\"","user":{"login":"bsilverajan","id":4979435,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4979435?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bsilverajan","html_url":"https://github.com/bsilverajan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bsilverajan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bsilverajan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bsilverajan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bsilverajan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bsilverajan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bsilverajan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bsilverajan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bsilverajan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bsilverajan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls/labels/editorial","name":"editorial","color":"0e8a16"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-07-19T11:52:38Z","updated_at":"2016-07-19T12:09:49Z","closed_at":null,"body":"\r\nReplacing \"CoAP over TCP, TLS and Websockets\" with \"CoAP over reliable transports\" is a good idea to reduce repetition. I feel it might be a good idea to clarify when we refer to reliable transports, that we actually refer to stream-based reliable transports. \r\n\r\nDatagram-based  reliable transports (eg DCCP, QUIC, etc) exist, which render the Message Framing layer in Figure 1 unnecessary. I'm not advocating that we run CoAP over QUIC, DCCP etc but perhaps clarification would be wise."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls/issues/comments/233612878","html_url":"https://github.com/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls/issues/49#issuecomment-233612878","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls/issues/49","id":233612878,"user":{"login":"brianraymor","id":3644743,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3644743?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianraymor","html_url":"https://github.com/brianraymor","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianraymor/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianraymor/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianraymor/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianraymor/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianraymor/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianraymor/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianraymor/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianraymor/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianraymor/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-19T12:09:49Z","updated_at":"2016-07-19T12:09:49Z","body":"See also #7 "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"brianraymor"}}