{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jspm/jspm-cli/issues/1836","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jspm/jspm-cli","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jspm/jspm-cli/issues/1836/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jspm/jspm-cli/issues/1836/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jspm/jspm-cli/issues/1836/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jspm/jspm-cli/issues/1836","id":156246527,"number":1836,"title":"JSPM link doesn't install nested linked dependencies (0.17.14 Beta)","user":{"login":"fusionstrings","id":450624,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/450624?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings","html_url":"https://github.com/fusionstrings","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-05-23T10:16:12Z","updated_at":"2016-05-23T12:15:26Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi,\r\nAbility to link with local folders is a very useful feature. I am using it for couple of modules and it's working fine unless one of the linked package also uses another local folder as linked dependency.\r\n\r\n##Example\r\n- Package *A* depends on local linked package *B* (**This works**)\r\n- Created another package *C*, add it as dependency on package \"B\". (**Package B works**)\r\n- Trying to relink *B* in *A* using documented method/s results in following error.\r\n\r\n```sh\r\n    jspm link ./../module-b local:module-b@0.0.1\r\n        Updating registry cache...\r\n        Processing linked package local:module-b@0.0.1\r\n\r\n    err  Package local:module-c can only be linked and not installed.\r\n\r\n    err  Error looking up local:module-c.\r\n```\r\n Using `jspm link ./../module-b`also results in same error."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jspm/jspm-cli/issues/comments/220963777","html_url":"https://github.com/jspm/jspm-cli/issues/1836#issuecomment-220963777","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jspm/jspm-cli/issues/1836","id":220963777,"user":{"login":"fusionstrings","id":450624,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/450624?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings","html_url":"https://github.com/fusionstrings","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/fusionstrings/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-05-23T12:15:26Z","updated_at":"2016-05-23T12:15:26Z","body":"Alright, but how is it different than making C direct dependency in A? \r\nNot complaining but just trying to understand, doesn't it defeat the purpose of encapsulated dependencies?\r\n\r\nOne needs to know full dependency tree to achieve it."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"fusionstrings"}}