{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/coala/coala-bears/issues/847","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/coala/coala-bears","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/coala/coala-bears/issues/847/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/coala/coala-bears/issues/847/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/coala/coala-bears/issues/847/events","html_url":"https://github.com/coala/coala-bears/issues/847","id":180006621,"number":847,"title":"SpellCheckBear: Add options","user":{"login":"sils1297","id":5716520,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5716520?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sils1297","html_url":"https://github.com/sils1297","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sils1297/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sils1297/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sils1297/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sils1297/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sils1297/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sils1297/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sils1297/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sils1297/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sils1297/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/coala/coala-bears/labels/area/lintbears","name":"area/lintbears","color":"fbca04"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/coala/coala-bears/labels/difficulty/low","name":"difficulty/low","color":"207de5"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-09-29T10:07:13Z","updated_at":"2016-09-29T10:07:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"> ideally, the bear would support\r\n> \r\n> -  a \"known good words\" textfile (that's the thing that I think scspell already supports)\r\n> -  regex for exclusion (although it may be worked around by adding bear-ignore comments, but that's going to be a lot of work). A regex would be nicer, that means we can exclude sphinx-sequences including code-snippets (because they are marked with .. code:: as well), others can exclude other non-natural language parts.\r\n> -  thinking aloud, an 'inclusion' regex might be nice as well; that way you could spell-check comments in an otherwise code file. But hey that might be wishful thinking ;-)\r\n\r\nFrom https://github.com/testthedocs/ttd.training-docs-basics/issues/3#issuecomment-250417333\r\n\r\n@Asnelchristian do you have time to look into this?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"sils1297"}}