{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90/events","html_url":"https://github.com/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90","id":134726609,"number":90,"title":"Add \"Partner Pool\" system","user":{"login":"brianjrobertson","id":12117751,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12117751?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson","html_url":"https://github.com/brianjrobertson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/labels/help%20wanted","name":"help wanted","color":"159818"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":10,"created_at":"2016-02-18T23:15:08Z","updated_at":"2016-03-16T17:32:44Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I've been working on Issue #77 and #78, and also looking for approaches to reinforce Holacracy's partner vs. employee paradigm, and resist (or at least help highlight) victim meaning-making patterns and projections on the company and other partners.\r\n\r\nWell, I've now got a very rough draft of a multi-faceted new system.  It needs more vetting, perhaps some more work, and likely trying it as a constitutional amendment within HolacracyOne for awhile.  But first, I'm posting it here for feedback. I'll attach the draft text below, and here's a [video walkthrough explaining the system](https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BymXxFXb0ha5cUZJUlpvSVExUHc/view?usp=sharing)."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/comments/197445624","html_url":"https://github.com/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90#issuecomment-197445624","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/90","id":197445624,"user":{"login":"brianjrobertson","id":12117751,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12117751?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson","html_url":"https://github.com/brianjrobertson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/brianjrobertson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-16T17:32:44Z","updated_at":"2016-03-16T17:32:44Z","body":"@martinroell and @gudjon:  While I appreciate that this text _in its current form_ is more complex than we want in the core constitution, I also feel strongly that this general approach or something a lot like it is needed in the core constitution.\r\n\r\nIt's not just an app, because it’s defining how you adopt people-related apps - i.e. which circle can adopt them and who gets to be included in that membership.  There's also a default treatment for those various functions (hiring, firing, comp changes, etc.) until you adopt an app.  Those defaults can be changed of course with an app, but the part that's more core than app is locating where those changes can be made, and what roles & representatives get to be included in the decision-making.\r\n\r\nAnd, I can tell you from lots of first-hand experience now: many Holacracy adoptions are significantly impaired by not having better defaults here, and by not having an encoded pathway for a partnership-related rep to be able to drive those changes to those defaults.  There is a **_lot_** of tension that these changes will resolve.\r\n\r\nSo, my current focus is on finding ways to simplify and streamline this as much as possible to mitigate the complexity factor.  And some of that will happen naturally as other new features get implemented - e.g. once we clarify how multi-filled roles make decisions, much of the special-case complexity in this text around that will vanish into that generic approach; and, once we clarify how circles without lead links generically work, some of the special-case text in here covering that will vanish.  But still, that's just a start - I agree that further simplification here will be very useful."}}