{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOCI/soci/issues/499","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOCI/soci","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOCI/soci/issues/499/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOCI/soci/issues/499/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOCI/soci/issues/499/events","html_url":"https://github.com/SOCI/soci/issues/499","id":174130438,"number":499,"title":"Blob offset not uniform between backends","user":{"login":"msobczak","id":11654989,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11654989?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/msobczak","html_url":"https://github.com/msobczak","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/msobczak/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/msobczak/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/msobczak/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/msobczak/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/msobczak/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/msobczak/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/msobczak/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/msobczak/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/msobczak/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-08-30T21:27:42Z","updated_at":"2016-09-01T12:35:51Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi,\r\nThe read/write operations for BLOB objects expect the \"offset\" parameter, which is not handled uniformly across backends.\r\nIn particular, Oracle expects 1 to denote the first byte of the BLOB object, wherease PostgreSQL expects 0 as the beginning index. This is reflected in the existing unit test cases.\r\nThis makes it more difficult to write backend-agnostic applications.\r\n\r\nIs this considered to be a problem?\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOCI/soci/issues/comments/244065142","html_url":"https://github.com/SOCI/soci/issues/499#issuecomment-244065142","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SOCI/soci/issues/499","id":244065142,"user":{"login":"mloskot","id":80741,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/80741?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mloskot","html_url":"https://github.com/mloskot","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mloskot/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mloskot/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mloskot/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mloskot/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mloskot/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mloskot/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mloskot/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mloskot/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mloskot/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-01T12:35:51Z","updated_at":"2016-09-01T12:35:51Z","body":"AFAICT, those involved, developers and users, have accepted SOCI 4 may break compatibility in many places. That is one of the reasons SOCI 4 (current `master`) has been running for long time now without packaged release."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"mloskot"}}