{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KiCad/kicad-library/issues/742","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KiCad/kicad-library","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KiCad/kicad-library/issues/742/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KiCad/kicad-library/issues/742/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KiCad/kicad-library/issues/742/events","html_url":"https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-library/pull/742","id":181841049,"number":742,"title":"added several (many!!!) missing devices","user":{"login":"jkriege2","id":11967523,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11967523?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2","html_url":"https://github.com/jkriege2","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":95,"created_at":"2016-10-08T18:23:33Z","updated_at":"2016-10-31T20:47:45Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KiCad/kicad-library/pulls/742","html_url":"https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-library/pull/742","diff_url":"https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-library/pull/742.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-library/pull/742.patch"},"body":"Dear all, I added all devices that I could think of and that were still missing in KiCAD + I reworked some of the existing devices:\n\n![add_missing](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/11967523/19259800/10c3ec56-8f85-11e6-8dc4-6e172cbbd48e.png)\n\nWhat do you think? Is anything missing? Do you like the style? Shoot at it ;-)\n\nBest & have a nice weekend,\nJAN\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KiCad/kicad-library/issues/comments/257416041","html_url":"https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-library/pull/742#issuecomment-257416041","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/KiCad/kicad-library/issues/742","id":257416041,"user":{"login":"jkriege2","id":11967523,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11967523?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2","html_url":"https://github.com/jkriege2","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkriege2/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-31T20:47:45Z","updated_at":"2016-10-31T20:47:45Z","body":"@CarlPoirier @diggit \r\n\r\nAbout the R_NET-naming ... I'm not yet sure, what a really good solution would look like, but what about this as a proposal:\r\n- `R_NETX_PAR_YYY` -> `R_Pack_xX_YYY` or `R_Array_xX_YYY`\r\n- `R_NETX_DIV_SIP` -> `R_Network_Dividers_xX_SIP`\r\n- `R_NETX` -> `R_Network_Star_xX_SIP`\r\n- move all resistor networks (maybe except the simple volatge divider) into a separate library `resistor_networks.lib`, so they don't clutter `device.lib` (same as already done for `switches.lib` and `mechanical_devices.lib` Then we only have the basic devices in `devices.lib` and the derived ... more specialized stuff in separate libs.\r\n\r\nComments: \r\n1. This will make the topology more clear from the names. \r\n2. I would really like to keep the `_SIP`, `_DIP` and even add it to all networks. The reason is IMHO simple: the pin-numbering is what makes the devices different. This is especially obvious for the parallel resistors (SIP: 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, ... DIP: 1-N, 2-(N-1), 3-(N-2), ...). And as far as I've seen , most commercially aravailable R arrays are either in a package with one line of input-pins (i.e. single in-line package = SIP) or with two parallel lines (Dual in-line Package =DIP, if we also understand SO/SOIC and other SMD packages with two parallel columns of pins, not just THT). THT and SMD-variants of DIPs have usually the same pinout. Taking the SOlution of KLC 4.4 would leave us with the problem of which package is the \"original\" package and which one is the modification ... and how to describe a complete reordering except with saying: OK, this is for devices in a DIP-package, not a SIP ... (or vice-versa)\r\n3. Having all the R_Networks in a separate lib would also make it easier to add more variants (there are variants where the common-pin of the R_NETX is in the center, there are R-2R and ladder-networks ... that are all not yet covered by the proposed symbols ...\r\n\r\nWhat do you think? ... I'm also open to other proposals for a naming scheme ...\r\n\r\nBest,\r\nJAN"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jkriege2"}}