{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mlr-org/mlr/issues/1195","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mlr-org/mlr","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mlr-org/mlr/issues/1195/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mlr-org/mlr/issues/1195/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mlr-org/mlr/issues/1195/events","html_url":"https://github.com/mlr-org/mlr/issues/1195","id":173275462,"number":1195,"title":"Measures that fail on single/all identical samples","user":{"login":"catastrophic-failure","id":18633953,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/18633953?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure","html_url":"https://github.com/catastrophic-failure","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2016-08-25T18:24:04Z","updated_at":"2016-09-02T13:20:28Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Per #1172 now measures that don't work on  single/all identical samples may include a warning. I'm willing to add the warnings and the tests if there's a consensus on which measures should have them.\r\n\r\nFor starters, `expvar` fails just like `rrse`.\r\n\r\n----\r\n\r\nThere might be overlap with #1154, so an unified approach needs to be defined."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mlr-org/mlr/issues/comments/244372651","html_url":"https://github.com/mlr-org/mlr/issues/1195#issuecomment-244372651","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mlr-org/mlr/issues/1195","id":244372651,"user":{"login":"catastrophic-failure","id":18633953,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/18633953?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure","html_url":"https://github.com/catastrophic-failure","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/catastrophic-failure/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-02T13:20:28Z","updated_at":"2016-09-02T13:20:28Z","body":"There's a possible issue we should solve. I'm adding warnings to the `measureX` functions, but I think it should be better located at the `x` objects. The reason is simple: if, for any reason, we add a measure that uses the same `measureX` the warning won't make sense to the user. What do you think?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"catastrophic-failure"}}