{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/mda.lakes/issues/87","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/mda.lakes","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/mda.lakes/issues/87/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/mda.lakes/issues/87/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/mda.lakes/issues/87/events","html_url":"https://github.com/USGS-R/mda.lakes/issues/87","id":142115800,"number":87,"title":"2016-03-19 Cal/Bias Results update","user":{"login":"lawinslow","id":347600,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/347600?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/lawinslow","html_url":"https://github.com/lawinslow","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lawinslow/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lawinslow/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lawinslow/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lawinslow/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lawinslow/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lawinslow/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lawinslow/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lawinslow/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lawinslow/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2016-03-20T00:47:22Z","updated_at":"2016-03-20T02:33:19Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Ok, this isn't apples to apples with our old model runs. The lakes are different (MI and MN added). I also don't have *all* the data in here yet. \r\n\r\n@jread-usgs you won't be stoked about this though. \r\n\r\nModel | Bias | RMSE\r\n---|---|---\r\nNLDAS | 1.83 | 4.03\r\n\r\nNot sure what's going on. ACCESS running right now and digging in a bit into what's going on with NLDAS. I still need to make sure I'm overlapping with all our Wisco lakes, plus the new ones. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/mda.lakes/issues/comments/198834056","html_url":"https://github.com/USGS-R/mda.lakes/issues/87#issuecomment-198834056","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-R/mda.lakes/issues/87","id":198834056,"user":{"login":"jread-usgs","id":2349007,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2349007?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs","html_url":"https://github.com/jread-usgs","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jread-usgs/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-20T02:33:19Z","updated_at":"2016-03-20T02:33:19Z","body":"But those would pull bias negative, right?"}}