{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/quintel/etmodel/issues/2095","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/quintel/etmodel","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/quintel/etmodel/issues/2095/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/quintel/etmodel/issues/2095/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/quintel/etmodel/issues/2095/events","html_url":"https://github.com/quintel/etmodel/issues/2095","id":149479977,"number":2095,"title":"Counter-intuitive profitability calculation results: are these correct?","user":{"login":"AlexanderWirtz","id":308563,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/308563?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexanderWirtz","html_url":"https://github.com/AlexanderWirtz","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexanderWirtz/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexanderWirtz/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexanderWirtz/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexanderWirtz/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexanderWirtz/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexanderWirtz/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexanderWirtz/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexanderWirtz/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/AlexanderWirtz/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":{"login":"jorisberkhout","id":4669028,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4669028?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jorisberkhout","html_url":"https://github.com/jorisberkhout","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jorisberkhout/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jorisberkhout/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jorisberkhout/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jorisberkhout/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jorisberkhout/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jorisberkhout/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jorisberkhout/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jorisberkhout/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jorisberkhout/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-04-19T14:36:52Z","updated_at":"2016-04-20T08:05:57Z","closed_at":"2016-04-20T08:05:57Z","body":"I am puzzled as to how come the profitability results are so different in the SER 2023 scenario after the update.\r\n\r\n1. I was playing around with this and noticed the following: if I rest coal and gas proces to `present` values, all plants become unprofitable. \r\n![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/308563/14642679/b3c398ac-064b-11e6-8e87-a96b24f07fce.png)\r\n\r\n2. This is odd as coal and nuclear are still running full throttle. I suppose the price setting plants do not set the electricity price high enough? Let's play around with some of these: let's remove the most unprofitable ones. These are the `Gas plant for district heat` and the `Gas conventional` plants:\r\n\r\nRemoving the `Gas conventional plants` which have no FLH:\r\n![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/308563/14642848/5c473d1c-064c-11e6-9459-d67d363eeb1b.png)\r\n\r\nStrangely enough the nuclear and coal plants now make money, even though they still do the same FLH and the price setting plants are the same (`Gas conventional` had zero FLH).\r\n\r\nLet's remove the `Gas plants for district heat` too as they almost have no FLH and are heavily loss making:\r\n \r\n![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/308563/14642914/a7fe47dc-064c-11e6-8366-5679971bd1d8.png)\r\n\r\nWho still gets these results? Suddenly CCGT plants are the most profitable, even though they are now the price setting plants more often and power prices must needs be **lower** on average, meaning everyone makes less money @ the same FLH. Scusa, ma io non ci capisco un cavolo.\r\n\r\nWhat am I missing @jorisberkhout?\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nNotifying @ChaelKruip and @RobTerwel "}}