{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TomasMikula/RichTextFX/issues/342","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TomasMikula/RichTextFX","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TomasMikula/RichTextFX/issues/342/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TomasMikula/RichTextFX/issues/342/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TomasMikula/RichTextFX/issues/342/events","html_url":"https://github.com/TomasMikula/RichTextFX/issues/342","id":166067832,"number":342,"title":"StyledTextArea no longer extends Control","user":{"login":"effad","id":4497475,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4497475?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad","html_url":"https://github.com/effad","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2016-07-18T10:55:13Z","updated_at":"2016-07-19T07:03:16Z","closed_at":"2016-07-19T07:03:16Z","body":"StyledTextArea used to derive from javafx.scene.control.Control. In 0.7-M1 it no longer does, thus making it uncombinable with ControlsFX Validation which requires a Control to be passed.\r\n\r\nSince StyledTextArea has all the characteristics of a Control it should derive from javafx.scene.control.Control."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TomasMikula/RichTextFX/issues/comments/233548663","html_url":"https://github.com/TomasMikula/RichTextFX/issues/342#issuecomment-233548663","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TomasMikula/RichTextFX/issues/342","id":233548663,"user":{"login":"effad","id":4497475,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4497475?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad","html_url":"https://github.com/effad","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/effad/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-19T07:03:16Z","updated_at":"2016-07-19T07:03:16Z","body":"Thanks for the hints. It is clear now that this is not a mere oversight but a planned and reasonable design decision.\r\n\r\nAs to ControlsFX Validation requiring Control: From a quick glance it looks as if it should also work on any Node and it should just be a matter of adapting a lot of code to do so.\r\n\r\nConsidering the fact that the current validation stuff from ControlsFX should be improved / replaced anyway (https://bitbucket.org/controlsfx/controlsfx/issues/372/more-flexibility-in-validationsupport) this seems to be the correct end to change."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"effad"}}