{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/difi/oxalis/issues/255","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/difi/oxalis","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/difi/oxalis/issues/255/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/difi/oxalis/issues/255/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/difi/oxalis/issues/255/events","html_url":"https://github.com/difi/oxalis/issues/255","id":160608511,"number":255,"title":"Support for 'private' operationalmode?","user":{"login":"tjeb","id":1710740,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1710740?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjeb","html_url":"https://github.com/tjeb","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjeb/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjeb/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjeb/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjeb/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjeb/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjeb/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjeb/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjeb/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tjeb/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2016-06-16T08:45:50Z","updated_at":"2016-11-14T13:57:28Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi,\n\nwe have a few parties developing systems to work with or using Oxalis, and some of them do not have PEPPOL (test) certificates yet, or may not have them at all (since they will not be running the access points themselves as a third party). In order to improve the interoperability testing in an early phase it would be very nice to be able to test with a local PKI in a group that has short lines and quick communication.\n\nI have a patch in my fork that adds a third operational mode 'PRIVATE'; this enables a configuration option oxalis.truststore where a local truststore can be set apart from the existing production and test truststores. It can be found in https://github.com/tjeb/oxalis/tree/private_truststore\n\nWould you consider that a useful addition in the mainline? If so, I can make a pull request; the current branch is based on tag oxalis-3.2.0 which is what we are running, but I could clean it up and base it on master as well. Related to that, are there any new releases planned for 3?\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/difi/oxalis/issues/comments/260340913","html_url":"https://github.com/difi/oxalis/issues/255#issuecomment-260340913","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/difi/oxalis/issues/255","id":260340913,"user":{"login":"rikribbers","id":3034846,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3034846?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rikribbers","html_url":"https://github.com/rikribbers","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rikribbers/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rikribbers/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rikribbers/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rikribbers/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rikribbers/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rikribbers/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rikribbers/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rikribbers/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rikribbers/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-11-14T13:57:28Z","updated_at":"2016-11-14T13:57:28Z","body":"In other words. You want us to provide a pull-request on the 4.0 branch code base? "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"rikribbers"}}