{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ua-eas/kfs/issues/152","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ua-eas/kfs","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ua-eas/kfs/issues/152/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ua-eas/kfs/issues/152/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ua-eas/kfs/issues/152/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ua-eas/kfs/pull/152","id":169015056,"number":152,"title":"UAF-2935 - Adding corrected XML per WorkflowData.xsd specified in Rice.","user":{"login":"sskinner","id":3514837,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3514837?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner","html_url":"https://github.com/sskinner","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-08-02T23:45:08Z","updated_at":"2016-08-03T18:59:01Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ua-eas/kfs/pulls/152","html_url":"https://github.com/ua-eas/kfs/pull/152","diff_url":"https://github.com/ua-eas/kfs/pull/152.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/ua-eas/kfs/pull/152.patch"},"body":"Replaced invalid elements with those specified in the Rice schemata at:\r\n* RICE/impl/src/main/resources/schema/WorkflowData.xsd\r\n* RICE/impl/src/main/resources/schema/RuleAttribute.xsd\r\nMisty has tested these specific changes in the TST environment, which means all files in the workflow directory have now been ingested successfully after this most recent data refresh."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ua-eas/kfs/issues/comments/237336818","html_url":"https://github.com/ua-eas/kfs/pull/152#issuecomment-237336818","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ua-eas/kfs/issues/152","id":237336818,"user":{"login":"sskinner","id":3514837,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3514837?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner","html_url":"https://github.com/sskinner","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sskinner/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-08-03T18:59:01Z","updated_at":"2016-08-03T18:59:01Z","body":"Ok, looking at it again, I see several forms located under DocumentType.xsd, including the form I use above, *and* the form that the old version has. The odd thing is that if we use the old way, that the DB will be hit, and that the old values in the XML are not currently in the related table.\r\n\r\nOh wait... I think it is now conclusive -- I just looked these up in the KFS3 DB, and the values are present there (they aren't in 6, it didn't occur to me till now to compare the two). So there it is, that's how this must have been able to load before. It's just odd, since even the file you make mention of above, has the same new elements I changed to in this PR (to be fair, it contains both the old and new). Also, this new form also seems to work fine, as Misty's testing passed all of the PO tests. I'm wondering if there aren't just two ways to do the same thing, or if the testing procedure is missing the case to flex this functionality."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"sskinner"}}