{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timmolter/XChange/issues/1129","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timmolter/XChange/issues/1129/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timmolter/XChange/issues/1129/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timmolter/XChange/issues/1129/events","html_url":"https://github.com/timmolter/XChange/issues/1129","id":121488025,"number":1129,"title":"Come up with solution to multiple-orderbook situations","user":{"login":"baffo32","id":240981,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/240981?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/baffo32","html_url":"https://github.com/baffo32","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/baffo32/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/baffo32/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/baffo32/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/baffo32/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/baffo32/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/baffo32/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/baffo32/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/baffo32/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/baffo32/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-12-10T13:44:58Z","updated_at":"2016-01-14T14:44:33Z","closed_at":"2016-01-14T14:44:33Z","body":"Some exchanges do not have one single orderbook but rather offer a few different ones for the same currencypairs, differing perhaps on the party which is offering the service or the source of the currency.  Currently these exchanges cannot be accessed in a generic way because there is no unified interface for this situation.  I believe examples include ripple and cryptofacilities.\r\n\r\nOne solution I imagine could be subclassing or extending the Currency class to add one additional field.  Then the existing interfaces could be used."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timmolter/XChange/issues/comments/171661172","html_url":"https://github.com/timmolter/XChange/issues/1129#issuecomment-171661172","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/timmolter/XChange/issues/1129","id":171661172,"user":{"login":"jheusser","id":1693496,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1693496?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jheusser","html_url":"https://github.com/jheusser","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jheusser/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jheusser/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jheusser/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jheusser/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jheusser/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jheusser/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jheusser/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jheusser/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jheusser/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-01-14T14:44:33Z","updated_at":"2016-01-14T14:44:33Z","body":"That's probably best done outside of XChange."}}