{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grandstaish/paperparcel/issues/9","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grandstaish/paperparcel","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grandstaish/paperparcel/issues/9/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grandstaish/paperparcel/issues/9/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grandstaish/paperparcel/issues/9/events","html_url":"https://github.com/grandstaish/paperparcel/issues/9","id":134185026,"number":9,"title":"Add support for having no null checks for container items","user":{"login":"grandstaish","id":2288921,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2288921?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish","html_url":"https://github.com/grandstaish","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grandstaish/paperparcel/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-02-17T05:40:25Z","updated_at":"2016-03-23T05:22:00Z","closed_at":"2016-03-23T05:22:00Z","body":"Although kotlin's compiler knows that `List<Value>` can't contain contain null values but `List<Value?>` can, the compiled class file loses this information. For that reason, PaperParcel will _always_ do a null-check on every item within a container (e.g. list, map, array, etc). It would be nice to be able to opt-in to say \"none of these items can ever be null\" and hence remove the extraneous checking. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grandstaish/paperparcel/issues/comments/200186050","html_url":"https://github.com/grandstaish/paperparcel/issues/9#issuecomment-200186050","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/grandstaish/paperparcel/issues/9","id":200186050,"user":{"login":"grandstaish","id":2288921,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2288921?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish","html_url":"https://github.com/grandstaish","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/grandstaish/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-23T05:22:00Z","updated_at":"2016-03-23T05:22:00Z","body":"The API required for this would be too ugly, for very little benefit. Closing. "}}