{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/librenms/librenms/issues/3222","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/librenms/librenms","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/librenms/librenms/issues/3222/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/librenms/librenms/issues/3222/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/librenms/librenms/issues/3222/events","html_url":"https://github.com/librenms/librenms/issues/3222","id":140298994,"number":3222,"title":"Issue with Calix E7 Interface Polling/Graphing","user":{"login":"thecityofguanyu","id":10196496,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10196496?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu","html_url":"https://github.com/thecityofguanyu","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2016-03-11T21:40:40Z","updated_at":"2016-04-05T22:08:39Z","closed_at":"2016-04-05T15:49:27Z","body":"Daily update enabled, current verison: <code>2e802d8</code>\r\n\r\nAs of now I have three Calix E7 systems added as nodes. None of the are accurately graphing the traffic that is passing across the interfaces.\r\n\r\nYou'll see below that the realtime graph is displaying very incorrect thoughput values when compared to the actual admitted traffic on a GPON port:\r\n![realtime]\r\n(http://i.imgur.com/LkoaDrA.png)\r\n\r\nThe highlighted row in the image below shows the values in the librenms database for ifInOctets/ifOutOctets on one particular GPON port:\r\n![port-db]\r\n(http://i.imgur.com/0QXc402.png)\r\n\r\nYet the graph for that port looks as follows:\r\n![port-graph]\r\n(http://i.imgur.com/AdvlsTm.png)\r\n\r\nMaybe I'm mistaken here, but shouldn't it be taking the ifHCInOctets & ifHCOutOctets? As opposed to just ifInOctets/ifOutOctets. I'm probably wrong there, as I can't find high capacity counter info anywhere in the database for our other equipment (Brocade, Juniper, Cisco) and they all graph correctly.\r\n\r\nIf it helps, we were able to get this to successfully graph on our old Cacti deployment with the values configured below; however, we're trying to move away from Cacti over to LibreNMS.\r\n![cacti1]\r\n(http://i.imgur.com/bIPLh2y.png)\r\n\r\nAny ideas here?\r\n\r\n@murrant tagging you because we discussed it briefly on IRC and I think you added the E7-CALIX MIB.\r\n\r\n**EDIT**:\r\n\r\nRegarding \r\n>Maybe I'm mistaken here, but shouldn't it be taking the ifHCInOctets & ifHCOutOctets?\r\n\r\nSeems to be a pretty significant difference between\r\n```\r\nsnmpwalk -v2c -c public -M +mibs -m +all 10.1.10.27 ifHCOutOctets.30101\r\nIF-MIB::ifHCOutOctets.30101 = Counter64: 10142998413825\r\n```\r\nAnd\r\n```\r\nsnmpwalk -v2c -c public -M +mibs -m +all 10.1.10.27 ifOutOctets.30101\r\nIF-MIB::ifOutOctets.30101 = Counter32: 2581954566\r\n```\r\nThe value of ifHCOutOctets appears to match the DB table image in the original post very closely while ifOutOctets does not, so I would wager that it is correctly polling 64-bit counters and adding that data to the database.\r\n\r\nWhy it is not graphing properly is still beyond me."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/librenms/librenms/issues/comments/206003900","html_url":"https://github.com/librenms/librenms/issues/3222#issuecomment-206003900","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/librenms/librenms/issues/3222","id":206003900,"user":{"login":"thecityofguanyu","id":10196496,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10196496?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu","html_url":"https://github.com/thecityofguanyu","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thecityofguanyu/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-04-05T22:08:39Z","updated_at":"2016-04-05T22:08:39Z","body":"@murrant Issue reported in \"earlier\" 2.3 release, resolved in 2.3.50.\r\n\r\n>System\r\n? Resolved: When performing an SNMPwalk on an E7-2 GPON system, a low-sw-alarm may occur.\r\n(EX-18139, EX-17546, 17513)"}}