{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39/events","html_url":"https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39","id":165717663,"number":39,"title":"Research/academic quality of submission","user":{"login":"pjotrp","id":13551,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13551?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp","html_url":"https://github.com/pjotrp","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":12,"created_at":"2016-07-15T06:03:02Z","updated_at":"2016-07-21T01:23:38Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I was just looking a newly submitted paper and wondered whether it actually addresses a research question, i.e., its academic value. I think we should add a standard reviewer question that says something about that. It is a box that needs to be ticked if we want to be taken seriously as a scientific journal. We don't want JOSS to end up as a basket for software projects that have no academic value."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/comments/234131488","html_url":"https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39#issuecomment-234131488","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/39","id":234131488,"user":{"login":"pjotrp","id":13551,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13551?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp","html_url":"https://github.com/pjotrp","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pjotrp/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-21T01:23:38Z","updated_at":"2016-07-21T01:23:38Z","body":"Thanks for the clarification! If you have not done so, could you add that to your paper or README?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"pjotrp"}}