{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Blu3wolf/Treefarm-Lite/issues/26","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Blu3wolf/Treefarm-Lite","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Blu3wolf/Treefarm-Lite/issues/26/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Blu3wolf/Treefarm-Lite/issues/26/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Blu3wolf/Treefarm-Lite/issues/26/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Blu3wolf/Treefarm-Lite/issues/26","id":152025273,"number":26,"title":"treefarms updating on mod 60 of event.tick","user":{"login":"Blu3wolf","id":12153041,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12153041?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Blu3wolf","html_url":"https://github.com/Blu3wolf","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Blu3wolf/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Blu3wolf/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Blu3wolf/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Blu3wolf/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Blu3wolf/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Blu3wolf/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Blu3wolf/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Blu3wolf/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Blu3wolf/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Blu3wolf/Treefarm-Lite/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"},{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Blu3wolf/Treefarm-Lite/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-04-30T11:18:05Z","updated_at":"2016-04-30T11:18:05Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@Peppe-KSP\r\n\r\nIs there much reason to move treefarms to update on mod 60 of the tick instead of the tick number? Just on its own that would prevent 'lost' treefarms like #25, but other than improving performance of a loop in a loop that searched for 'lost' treefarms, I cant see much use to it. And seeing as it would prevent them, such a function would not serve much purpose. \r\n\r\nThoughts? Im just debating whether or not to delete dd216bf, or maybe to develop it further. "}}