{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar/issues/1","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar/issues/1","id":181354574,"number":1,"title":"Re-simulation of CIFAR 100 results with different pre-processing using wrn","user":{"login":"revilokeb","id":10588773,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10588773?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb","html_url":"https://github.com/revilokeb","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-10-06T08:37:51Z","updated_at":"2016-10-06T22:04:33Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@ibmua I have run a few simulations based on the code and the model https://github.com/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar/blob/master/models/wide-res-restructured-pooled-actually.lua which seems to be your best performing based on your comments in https://github.com/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar/blob/master/notebooks/visualize.ipynb\r\n\r\nDepending on the choice of preprocessing I am obtaining the following errors:\r\n\r\n- CIFAR 100 whitened (https://yadi.sk/d/em4b0FMgrnqxy): ~20.2%\r\n- CIFAR 100 combined (https://github.com/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar/blob/master/datasets/cifar100_combined.t7.tar.gz): ~18.6%\r\n- CIFAR 100 std_mean using your little script on CIFAR 100 combined: ~18.8%\r\n\r\nI have run simulation for each for around 250 epochs, the above numbers are \"eye-balling averages\" of the last ~30 epochs.\r\n\r\nHave you run simulations on mean / std adjusted dataset and have your results been even better?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar/issues/comments/252101896","html_url":"https://github.com/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar/issues/1#issuecomment-252101896","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmua/Breaking-Cifar/issues/1","id":252101896,"user":{"login":"revilokeb","id":10588773,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10588773?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb","html_url":"https://github.com/revilokeb","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/revilokeb/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-06T22:04:33Z","updated_at":"2016-10-06T22:04:33Z","body":"Ok thanks for the info! I will update if I am finding anything interesting."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"revilokeb"}}