{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/227","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/227/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/227/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/227/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/227","id":133326328,"number":227,"title":"globally sequential id #","user":{"login":"highflyer77","id":10690656,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10690656?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77","html_url":"https://github.com/highflyer77","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-02-12T19:42:23Z","updated_at":"2016-02-12T23:14:30Z","closed_at":null,"body":"This would open up all kinds of possibilities of being able to reference a message by id #. \r\n\r\nIt was discussed yesterday by: sagerdearia that: \r\n\r\n>  \\<sagerdearia>  Hi all. I have been noticing that LinkedIn has been gradually becoming similar to\r\n>                 Facebook, including ability to like posts, and I thought I'd suggest that IRC v3 \r\n>                 protocol should incorporate the ability to like privmsgs sent to channels and \r\n>                 users\r\n\r\n* **a globally sequential id # , could make this a possibility.**\r\n\r\nAnd just now a message by: @dequis on issue #226 \r\n\r\n> I'd rather leave that up to the implementation. It just needs to be unique-ish. It could be a reference to a globally sequential id in a server side log database, for example\r\n\r\n* **a globally sequential id # , could make this a possibility.**    \r\n  \r\n\r\nFinally I'd like to say that I can think of many uses for this and doing this could be useful for a lot of different kinds of implementations to make them a reality."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/comments/183522673","html_url":"https://github.com/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/227#issuecomment-183522673","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/227","id":183522673,"user":{"login":"highflyer77","id":10690656,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10690656?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77","html_url":"https://github.com/highflyer77","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/highflyer77/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-12T23:14:30Z","updated_at":"2016-02-12T23:14:30Z","body":"I also thought that this could be useful for \"multi-line\" #208 because if BATCH was used to implement it, the current specs. for BATCH doesn't specify any specific ordering (please correct me if I'm wrong).  \r\nAnd  \r\nThis could also be used to simplify things on the client side for things like: \"bookmarking\" of logged messages of interest or code examples, or making a link for linking to a previous message id., etc.\r\n"}}