{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/square/retrofit/issues/626","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/square/retrofit","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/square/retrofit/issues/626/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/square/retrofit/issues/626/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/square/retrofit/issues/626/events","html_url":"https://github.com/square/retrofit/issues/626","id":45071958,"number":626,"title":"Expose RequestAction for pluggable parameters handlers.","user":{"login":"JakeWharton","id":66577,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/66577?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeWharton","html_url":"https://github.com/JakeWharton","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeWharton/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeWharton/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeWharton/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeWharton/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeWharton/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeWharton/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeWharton/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeWharton/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/JakeWharton/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":273286533,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/square/retrofit/labels/Feature","name":"Feature","color":"009800","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":10,"created_at":"2014-10-07T06:05:41Z","updated_at":"2016-11-07T11:34:40Z","closed_at":null,"body":"There's a lot of types people want to use for a lot of things. Having a mechanism to support custom parameter type handling would provide an extension point (albeit an advanced one) to prevent the further need to one-off these in the future. Bonus points if we can somehow figure out how to build the first-party behavior using this mechanism.\n#613.\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/square/retrofit/issues/comments/258813180","html_url":"https://github.com/square/retrofit/issues/626#issuecomment-258813180","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/square/retrofit/issues/626","id":258813180,"user":{"login":"matiwinnetou","id":335933,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/335933?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/matiwinnetou","html_url":"https://github.com/matiwinnetou","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/matiwinnetou/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/matiwinnetou/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/matiwinnetou/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/matiwinnetou/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/matiwinnetou/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/matiwinnetou/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/matiwinnetou/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/matiwinnetou/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/matiwinnetou/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-11-07T11:34:40Z","updated_at":"2016-11-07T11:34:40Z","body":"Could somebody look if @iwo branch could be incorporated? This is the only thing blocking us to move to Retrofit 2.x"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"matiwinnetou"}}