{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sorgerlab/indra/issues/51","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sorgerlab/indra","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sorgerlab/indra/issues/51/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sorgerlab/indra/issues/51/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sorgerlab/indra/issues/51/events","html_url":"https://github.com/sorgerlab/indra/issues/51","id":144673921,"number":51,"title":"Policies in make_model instead of PysbAssembler constructor?","user":{"login":"bgyori","id":5939016,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5939016?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgyori","html_url":"https://github.com/bgyori","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgyori/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgyori/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgyori/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgyori/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgyori/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgyori/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgyori/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgyori/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bgyori/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sorgerlab/indra/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2016-03-30T18:02:33Z","updated_at":"2016-03-30T18:20:00Z","closed_at":null,"body":"At some point policies became an argument in the constructor of the PysbAssembler. Wouldn't it make sense to put that back as an argument of make_model? The assembler collects statements and we would want to be able to generate multiple models from the same statements using the assembler by applying different policies. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sorgerlab/indra/issues/comments/203563870","html_url":"https://github.com/sorgerlab/indra/issues/51#issuecomment-203563870","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/sorgerlab/indra/issues/51","id":203563870,"user":{"login":"johnbachman","id":432756,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/432756?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/johnbachman","html_url":"https://github.com/johnbachman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johnbachman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johnbachman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johnbachman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johnbachman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johnbachman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johnbachman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johnbachman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johnbachman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/johnbachman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-30T18:20:00Z","updated_at":"2016-03-30T18:20:00Z","body":"Although one could also argue that the only job of the assembler, as a\nclass, is to retain a set of policies...similar to how the Preassembler's\njob is mainly to hold on to the enitity and modification hierarchies.\n\nOn Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Benjamin M. Gyori <notifications@github.com\n> wrote:\n\n> At some point policies became an argument in the constructor of the\n> PysbAssembler. Wouldn't it make sense to put that back as an argument of\n> make_model? The assembler collects statements and we would want to be able\n> to generate multiple models from the same statements using the assembler by\n> applying different policies.\n>\n> —\n> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n> <https://github.com/sorgerlab/indra/issues/51>\n>\n"}}